Cited by 44Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingExercise and Physiological Responses

Nutritional Strategies to Improve Post-exercise Recovery and Subsequent Exercise Performance: A Narrative Review

Open access
Naderi, Alireza, Rothschild, Jeffrey A., Santos, Heitor O., Hamidvand, Amin, Koozehchian, Majid S., Ghazzagh, Abdolrahman, Berjisian, Erfan, Podlogar, Tim·2025·Sports Medicine

Abstract

Post-exercise recovery strategies influence the body’s ability to restore physiological homeostasis, replenish energy stores, repair muscle damage, and promote desired adaptations, which improve exercise performance. This narrative review examines the impact of nutritional strategies commonly used for enhancing recovery and subsequent exercise performance, particularly when athletes face short recovery periods. Carbohydrate ingestion is essential for glycogen replenishment, especially within the initial hours post-exercise, with its impact dependent on the types, timing, and amount. Protein is essential for accelerating muscle recovery and achieving a positive nitrogen balance, depending on the type and dosage. The co-ingestion of carbohydrates with proteins or fats is explored for its role in maximizing glycogen resynthesis and muscle repair, with evidence supporting the addition of protein to suboptimal carbohydrate intake for enhanced recovery. Moreover, this review addresses the potential benefits of creatine and caffeine co-ingestion for accelerating glycogen synthesis and improving subsequent performance. Hydration strategies, including the use of milk-based beverages and electrolyte solutions, are also discussed, emphasizing their importance in maintaining fluid balance and optimizing recovery. This review also highlights the emerging role of micronutrients such as omega-3 fatty acids, antioxidants, and sodium bicarbonate in reducing muscle damage and improving acid–base balance. Evidence supports the tailored use of these nutritional strategies, particularly for athletes managing tight competition/training schedules. Future research should focus on refining individualized approaches for recovery and investigating the impact of novel supplements on subsequent performance.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This narrative review synthesizes nutritional strategies for post-exercise recovery and subsequent exercise performance, defined as performance within ~2–24 h after a prior exhaustive bout. Carbohydrate and protein are central, with conditional evidence for creatine, caffeine, sodium bicarbonate, hydration, fats, and micronutrients.

Key findings

  • Carbohydrate ingestion of 1–1.2 g·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ during the initial 4 h post-exercise is recommended, with glucose/glucose-derived sources and optional fructose co-ingestion; glucose–fructose improved subsequent endurance capacity by ~33% and ~27% in two studies versus glucose alone, but other performance studies found no benefit. Complete muscle glycogen replenishment typically takes 24–36 h with 7–12 g·kg⁻¹ carbohydrate per day; high-GI carbohydrate increased 24-h glycogen (~106 vs 72 mmol·kg⁻¹ wet weight) but performance effects were inconsistent.
  • Protein at 20–40 g post-exercise maximizes muscle protein synthesis for 3–4 h; endurance athletes are advised ~1.2–1.8 g·kg⁻¹·day⁻¹ and power athletes 1.7–2.2 g·kg⁻¹·day⁻¹. Carbohydrate–protein co-ingestion has small positive performance effects (~0.6–1.6%), with examples of ~14 min and ~8.5 min longer subsequent exercise capacity, especially when added to suboptimal carbohydrate.
  • Creatine plus carbohydrate may enhance glycogen storage (e.g., 82% greater resynthesis within 24 h; 18% increase after 5 days of 20 g·day⁻¹ loading; 53% with moderate carbohydrate), but effects on subsequent performance remain debated. Caffeine–carbohydrate co-ingestion shows mixed glycogen and performance results; sodium bicarbonate after exercise may restore acid–base balance and improve subsequent performance with 30–90 min recovery, though 35 min may be inadequate.
  • Rehydration should replace 125–150% of body mass lost; milk-based beverages, oral rehydration solutions, and water with solid meals can support recovery, while water alone has low beverage hydration index. Dietary fats have limited evidence and no clear effect on subsequent performance; micronutrients reduce exercise-induced muscle damage but not consistently performance, with >1000 mg polyphenols/day for at least 3 days recommended.

Methods

  • Narrative review with literature searched in PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar using keyword and Boolean combinations covering carbohydrate, protein, fat, creatine, sodium bicarbonate, caffeine, micronutrients, and fluids/electrolytes.
  • Evidence was classified as grade I (strong), grade II (moderate), or grade III (limited) based on consistency and volume of controlled trials.
  • The review synthesized findings on recovery and subsequent exercise performance occurring within ~2–24 h of prior exhaustive exercise; no systematic meta-analysis or formal risk-of-bias assessment is reported.

Limitations

  • Stated by the authors: much of the literature is based on male athletes, creating potential sex bias; exercise protocols vary and may not reflect real-world conditions; responses to creatine and caffeine co-ingestion are highly individualized; personalization literature is lacking; supplement interactions may not be additive; more research is needed in real-world sports, team sports, ultra-endurance events, and resistance-training athletes training twice daily.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not systematically quantify study quality or pool effect sizes; many cited studies use different doses, timing, glycogen-depletion protocols, and performance tests, and several conclusions rely on markers of muscle damage or glycogen rather than subsequent performance.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40279-025-02213-6

Cites

216 of 216 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

43 of 83 cited sources checked · 10 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    There is currently no evidence to recommend consuming more than 1.2 g·kg−1⋅h−1 of carbohydrates, regardless of type.

    “There is currently no evidence to recommend consuming more than 1.2 g·kg−1⋅h−1 of carbohydrates, regardless of type [22, 25].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] Trommelen J, et al. Fructose coingestion does not accelerate postexercise muscle glycogen repletion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(5):907–12. source
    • cites [25] Fuchs CJ, et al. Sucrose ingestion after exhaustive exercise accelerates liver, but not muscle glycogen repletion compared with glucose ingestion in trained athletes. J Appl Physiol. 2016;120(11):1328–34. source

      The NEW & NOTEWORTHY passage explicitly recommends sucrose at 1.5 g·kg−1·h−1 over glucose when rapid recovery of endogenous carbohydrate stores is the goal. Although the DISCUSSION says 1.2 g·kg−1·h−1 maximizes postexercise muscle glycogen synthesis, the paper reports faster liver glycogen repletion with sucrose at 1.5 g·kg−1·h−1. The claim's blanket statement, regardless of carbohydrate type, conflicts with that recommendation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Replenishing glycogen stores through immediate post-exercise carbohydrate intake is crucial for recovery, especially when athletes need to be fully prepared for another training session or competition within 24 h.

    “Replenishing glycogen stores through immediate post-exercise carbohydrate intake is crucial for recovery, especially when athletes need to be fully prepared for another training session or competition within 24 h [7–9].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [7] Bonilla DA, et al. The 4R’s framework of nutritional strategies for post-exercise recovery: a review with emphasis on new generation of carbohydrates. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(1):103. source
    • cites [8] Fuchs CJ, Gonzalez JT, van Loon LJC. Fructose co-ingestion to increase carbohydrate availability in athletes. J Physiol. 2019;597(14):3549–60. source
    • cites [9] Ivy JL. Regulation of muscle glycogen repletion, muscle protein synthesis and repair following exercise. J Sports Sci Med. 2004;3(3):131–8.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    Complete replenishment of muscle glycogen stores typically unfolds over a 24-36 h period post-exercise, provided that 7-12 g·kg−1 carbohydrate are consumed per day.

    “Complete replenishment of muscle glycogen stores typically unfolds over a 24–36 h period post-exercise, provided that 7–12 g·kg−1 carbohydrate are consumed per day [15–18].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [15] Burke LM, et al. Carbohydrates for training and competition. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(Suppl 1):S17-27. source

      In “Acute strategies to promote high carbohydrate availability for exercise” (page unavailable), the paper says glycogen stores can normalize within 24 hours with reduced training and adequate fuel, and that high glycogen concentrations can be achieved with 24–36 hours of high carbohydrate intake and rest. Table II gives 7–12 g/kg per 24 hours for general fuelling, but does not establish that this entire intake range typically produces complete post-exercise replenishment in 24–36 hours. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [16] Gonzalez JT, Betts JA. Dietary sugars, exercise and hepatic carbohydrate metabolism. Proc Nutr Soc. 2019;78(2):246–56. source

      The Exercise performance section says muscle glycogen may take 20–24 h to fully recover after exhaustive exercise with high carbohydrate intake, or up to 46 h on a moderate-carbohydrate diet (page unavailable in our copy). It does not give the claimed 24–36 h range or specify 7–12 g/kg of carbohydrate per day; its intake recommendation is 1–1.2 g/kg per hour during the first 4 h of recovery. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [17] Murray B, Rosenbloom C. Fundamentals of glycogen metabolism for coaches and athletes. Nutr Rev. 2018;76(4):243–59. source

      The Time Course of Glycogen Replenishment section says adequate carbohydrate can restore muscle glycogen within 24 hours, and Other Nutrient Interventions specifies at least 24 hours of rest with 10 g/kg/day for full restoration. The paper does not give 24–36 hours as the typical period or 7–12 g/kg/day as the requisite intake; Glycogen Resynthesis After Exercise also says sufficient total energy is needed. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [18] Podlogar T, Wallis GA. New horizons in carbohydrate research and application for endurance athletes. Sports Med. 2022;52(Suppl 1):5–23. source

      The Post-Competition section says full muscle-glycogen repletion is believed to require 24–36 hours. It recommends an initial hourly carbohydrate intake when rapid repletion is needed, followed by a diet that may provide up to 12 g/kg daily; it does not give a 7–12 g/kg daily range or say that this range ensures complete repletion. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Delaying post-exercise carbohydrate ingestion by 2 h may impair exercise performance the following day.

    “and may impair exercise performance the following day [14]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] Díaz-Lara J, et al. Delaying post-exercise carbohydrate intake impairs next-day exercise capacity but not muscle glycogen or molecular responses. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2024;240(10): e14215. source

      The Discussion reports reduced next-day high-intensity exercise capacity after delaying post-exercise carbohydrate intake. It specifies a 3-hour delay, not the 2-hour delay in the attributed claim; no page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Liver glycogen resynthesis proceeds at a slower pace during the initial post-exercise hours, achieving saturation only after 11-25 h, contingent upon adherence to a high-carbohydrate diet.

    “Liver glycogen resynthesis proceeds at a slower pace during the initial post-exercise hours, achieving saturation only after 11–25 h, contingent upon adherence to a high-carbohydrate diet [16].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Gonzalez JT, Betts JA. Dietary sugars, exercise and hepatic carbohydrate metabolism. Proc Nutr Soc. 2019;78(2):246–56. source

      The Exercise performance section reports that liver glycogen resynthesis is about 30–50% slower in the first 2 hours than at 3–5 hours post-exercise. It estimates 11 hours with glucose–fructose mixtures and about 25 hours with glucose alone, but those times are extrapolations under high carbohydrate ingestion, not observed saturation times or a general requirement for a high-carbohydrate diet. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
  • May combine two claims. 13
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Athletes engaged in power-based sports are advised to ingest 1.7-2.2 g·kg-1 protein.

    “while those engaged in power-based sports are advised to ingest 1.7–2.2 g·kg–1 [73]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [73] Chapman S, et al. Does protein supplementation support adaptations to arduous concurrent exercise training? A systematic review and meta-analysis with military based applications. Nutrients. 2021;13(5):1416. source

      The Discussion (§4.1; page not provided) calls 1.7–2.2 g·kg−1·day−1 a current recommendation in the context of arduous concurrent training. It does not identify that range as advice specifically for athletes in power-based sports; §4.2 also discusses the range for periods of intense or high-volume endurance training. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A pre-sleep protein dose of ≥40 g has been recommended to sustain MPS rates and minimize overnight muscle protein breakdown.

    “a pre-sleep protein dose of ≥ 40 g has been recommended to sustain MPS rates and minimize overnight muscle protein breakdown [75, 76]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [75] Res PT, et al. Protein ingestion before sleep improves postexercise overnight recovery. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(8):1560–9. source
    • cites [76] Trommelen J, et al. Presleep dietary protein-derived amino acids are incorporated in myofibrillar protein during postexercise overnight recovery. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2018;314(5):E457-e467. source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that 40 g of casein before sleep increased overnight muscle protein synthesis in previous work, while 30 g did not increase myofibrillar protein synthesis in this study. It calls for research to identify the maximal effective dose; it does not recommend a ≥40 g threshold or show that this dose minimizes overnight muscle protein breakdown. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Co-ingestion of glucose and fructose-based carbohydrates during the post-exercise recovery phase is likely more beneficial than other carbohydrate sources, given its superior efficacy in faster gastrointestinal absorption and glycogen stores and its association with reduced gastrointestinal discomfort when an optimal carbohydrate dosage of 1-1.2 g·kg−1⋅h−1 is consumed.

    “it is inferred that the co-ingestion of glucose and fructose-based carbohydrates during the post-exercise recovery phase is likely more beneficial than other carbohydrate sources, given its superior efficacy in faster gastrointestinal absorption and glycogen stores and its association with reduced gastrointestinal discomfort when an optimal carbohydrate dosage of 1–1.2 g·kg−1⋅h−1 is consumed [18]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] Podlogar T, Wallis GA. New horizons in carbohydrate research and application for endurance athletes. Sports Med. 2022;52(Suppl 1):5–23. source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Endurance athletes are recommended to consume ~1.2-1.8 g·kg-1 of high-quality protein.

    “Endurance athletes are recommended to consume ~ 1.2–1.8 g·kg–1 of high-quality protein [69–72]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [69] Tarnopolsky M. Protein requirements for endurance athletes. Nutrition. 2004;20(7–8):662–8. source
    • cites [70] Kato H, et al. Protein requirements are elevated in endurance athletes after exercise as determined by the indicator amino acid oxidation method. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6): e0157406. source

      The Discussion reports earlier recommendations of 1.2–1.4 g/kg/day for endurance athletes and this study’s recommended intake of 1.83 g/kg/day, supporting the approximate endpoints. It does not recommend a single 1.2–1.8 g/kg/day range of high-quality protein; the 1.83 estimate comes from a specific controlled-training and post-exercise setting. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [71] Bandegan A, et al. Indicator amino acid oxidation protein requirement estimate in endurance-trained men 24 h postexercise exceeds both the EAR and current athlete guidelines. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2019;316(5):E741-e748. source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) reports recommendations of 1.2–1.6 g·kg⁻¹·day⁻¹ for endurance-trained individuals. The Discussion (page unavailable) describes 1.8 g·kg⁻¹·day⁻¹ as typical intake, not a recommendation; the cited passages also do not specify high-quality protein. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [72] Wooding DJ, et al. Increased protein requirements in female athletes after variable-intensity exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(11):2297–304. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Current research suggests that glucose and glucose-derived carbohydrates, with or without the addition of fructose, are the most effective sources for replenishing post-exercise muscle glycogen within a recovery window ≤ 8 h, and that addition of monosaccharide galactose results in inferior replenishment rates.

    “current research suggests that glucose and glucose-derived carbohydrates, with or without the addition of fructose, are the most effective sources for replenishing post-exercise muscle glycogen within a recovery window ≤ 8 h, and that addition of monosaccharide galactose results in inferior replenishment rates [24]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] Podlogar T, et al. Postexercise muscle glycogen synthesis with glucose, galactose, and combined galactose-glucose ingestion. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2023;325(6):E672–81. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The optimal dose of protein for post-exercise recovery is 20-40 g of high-quality protein consumed after exercise, which maximizes MPS rates for several hours (3-4 h), with the exact dose dependent on muscle mass involved during exercise.

    “research suggesting that 20–40 g of high-quality protein consumed after exercise maximizes MPS rates for several hours (i.e., 3–4 h), the exact dose dependent on muscle mass involved during exercise [56–58]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [56] Churchward-Venne TA, Burd NA, Phillips SM. Nutritional regulation of muscle protein synthesis with resistance exercise: strategies to enhance anabolism. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2012;9(1):40. source

      The Conclusions (page unavailable) recommend about 20–25 g of rapidly absorbed protein to maximize post-exercise MPS in young healthy individuals. The ‘Leucine as a nutrient signal’ section (page unavailable) reports that 40 g did not increase MPS beyond 20 g in young men; it does not establish a 20–40 g optimal range or make the dose dependent on muscle mass exercised. The ‘window of anabolic potential’ section says the amino-acid-mediated increase lasts a few hours at most, but does not establish the stated 3–4-hour duration. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [57] Macnaughton LS, et al. The response of muscle protein synthesis following whole-body resistance exercise is greater following 40 g than 20 g of ingested whey protein. Physiol Rep. 2016;4(15):e12893. source

      The Introduction recommends about 20–25 g after leg-only resistance exercise, while the Discussion reports that 40 g produced greater MPS than 20 g after whole-body exercise in young resistance-trained men. The Discussion suggests that the amount of muscle activated may affect the effective dose, but explicitly says the study cannot determine the dose that maximizes MPS. It measured recovery over five hours, not a specified 3–4-hour period. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [58] Moore DR, et al. Ingested protein dose response of muscle and albumin protein synthesis after resistance exercise in young men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(1):161–8. source

      The Abstract and Discussion report that 20 g of high-quality protein maximized muscle protein synthesis after leg-based resistance exercise in six young men; the study measured synthesis over four hours. They do not establish that the optimal dose varies with the muscle mass exercised, and the Results found no greater response to 40 g than to 20 g. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Co-ingestion of glucose with fructose is preferred owing to reduced gastrointestinal complaints and the beneficial effect on liver glycogen replenishment.

    “Nevertheless, co-ingestion of glucose with fructose is preferred owing to reduced gastrointestinal complaints and the beneficial effect on liver glycogen replenishment, as discussed below [18, 22, 26]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [18] Podlogar T, Wallis GA. New horizons in carbohydrate research and application for endurance athletes. Sports Med. 2022;52(Suppl 1):5–23. source
    • cites [22] Trommelen J, et al. Fructose coingestion does not accelerate postexercise muscle glycogen repletion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(5):907–12. source
    • cites [26] Gonzalez JT, et al. Liver glycogen metabolism during and after prolonged endurance-type exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2016;311(3):E543–53. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Liver glycogen resynthesis is inherently slower than that of muscle, possibly owing to its higher rate of glycogen turnover and/or distinct glycogen synthesis pathways that are contingent on hormonal fluctuations.

    “Moreover, liver glycogen resynthesis is inherently slower than that of muscle, possibly owing to its higher rate of glycogen turnover and/or distinct glycogen synthesis pathways that are contingent on hormonal fluctuations (notably insulin, glucagon, and epinephrine) [45, 47].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [45] Gonzalez JT, Wallis GA. Carb-conscious: the role of carbohydrate intake in recovery from exercise. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2021;24(4):364–71. source

      In “Understanding liver glycogen metabolism cannot be simply extrapolated from evidence collection on muscle glycogen metabolism” (page not provided), the paper describes different post-exercise repletion patterns: liver repletion is slower in the first two hours than in hours 2–5, while muscle repletion is fastest early. It also describes substantial liver glycogen turnover and hormonal regulation, but does not establish that liver resynthesis is inherently slower than muscle resynthesis, that liver turnover is higher than muscle turnover, or that distinct synthesis pathways explain the difference. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [47] Gonzalez JT, et al. Glucose plus fructose ingestion for post-exercise recovery-greater than the sum of its parts? Nutrients. 2017;9(4):344. source

      Section 3.2 suggests that liver glycogen stores may take longer than muscle stores to recover after exercise, but it does not say liver resynthesis is inherently slower. It attributes the possible difference to post-exercise handling of glucose, not higher glycogen turnover. Sections 5.2 and 2 describe distinct liver synthesis pathways and insulin regulation, but do not establish the claimed explanation involving fluctuations in insulin, glucagon, and epinephrine. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Co-ingestion of carbohydrates and protein during post-exercise may confer additional benefits, including positive nitrogen balance leading to increased whole-body muscle protein synthesis, increased protein content related to mitochondrial biogenesis, reduced muscle damage markers, and accelerated post-exercise rehydration.

    “it may confer additional benefits, including positive nitrogen balance leading to increased whole-body muscle protein synthesis [93], increased protein content related to mitochondrial biogenesis [94], reduced muscle damage markers [95], and accelerated post-exercise rehydration [96]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [93] Churchward-Venne TA, et al. Dose-response effects of dietary protein on muscle protein synthesis during recovery from endurance exercise in young men: a double-blind randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;112(2):303–17. source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that whole-body net protein balance was negative with carbohydrate alone but positive after protein co-ingestion. The Results also report higher myofibrillar protein synthesis with 30 or 45 g of protein. The paper does not establish that positive whole-body balance leads to increased muscle protein synthesis; its Discussion cautions that whole-body protein metabolism is not necessarily reflective of the skeletal-muscle response. The other benefits in the sentence have separate citations and are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [94] Hansen M, et al. Supplement with whey protein hydrolysate in contrast to carbohydrate supports mitochondrial adaptations in trained runners. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2020;17(1):46. source
    • cites [95] Huang WC, et al. Whey protein improves marathon-induced injury and exercise performance in elite track runners. Int J Med Sci. 2017;14(7):648–54. source

      The Discussions report lower CK, LDH and AST after the marathon in athletes given whey protein than in the placebo group, supporting the cited point about reduced muscle-damage markers. However, the Methods (Experimental design) describe whey protein versus maltodextrin, not carbohydrate–protein co-ingestion, so the study does not establish that benefit for the combination. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Milk-based beverages have led to greater exercise capacity in subsequent exercise performance compared with both noncaloric and energy-matched beverages, likely due to simultaneously increasing glycogen resynthesis and stimulating muscle protein synthesis.

    “Milk-based beverages have also led to greater exercise capacity in subsequent exercise performance when compared with both noncaloric and energy-matched beverages, likely due to simultaneously increasing glycogen resynthesis and stimulating muscle protein synthesis [114].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [114] Russo I, et al. Systematic literature review: the effect of dairy milk on markers of recovery optimisation in response to endurance exercise. Int J sports Sci. 2019:69–85. source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Administering NaHCO3 within approximately <30 min following exercise can restore extracellular acid-base balance during a 75-90 min recovery period between two bouts of exercise and may improve subsequent exercise performance.

    “research has shown that administering NaHCO3 within approximately < 30 min following exercise can restore extracellular acid–base balance during a 75–90 min recovery period between two bouts of exercise and may improve subsequent exercise performance [129, 130]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [129] Gough LA, et al. Ingestion of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) following a fatiguing bout of exercise accelerates postexercise acid-base balance recovery and improves subsequent high-intensity cycling time to exhaustion. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2017;27(5):429–38. source
    • cites [130] Gough LA, et al. Post-exercise supplementation of sodium bicarbonate improves acid base balance recovery and subsequent high-intensity boxing specific performance. Front Nutr. 2019;6:155. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Exercising in a dehydrated state negatively affects both performance and health.

    “Exercising in a dehydrated state is well-established to negatively affect both performance and health [97, 98].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [97] Lorenzo I, Serra-Prat M, Yébenes JC. The role of water homeostasis in muscle function and frailty: a review. Nutrients. 2019;11(8):1857. source

      Section 7 (Dehydration in the Elderly; page unavailable) links dehydration with reduced muscle strength and adverse health outcomes in older adults. Section 10 (Water’s Role in Metabolic Muscle Function; page unavailable) says water loss can affect muscle function. Neither establishes that exercising while dehydrated negatively affects both performance and health, particularly as a well-established general finding. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [98] Maughan RJ, Shirreffs SM. Dehydration and rehydration in competative sport. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(Suppl 3):40–7. source

      The Summary (page not supplied) says dehydration can impair performance and pose a health risk, especially during or after exercise in warm climates. It qualifies this finding: dehydration must be sufficiently severe, and low levels are well tolerated in cool environments. The citing sentence omits those limits. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Protein ingestion after exercise promotes muscle protein synthesis, reduces muscle protein breakdown, and facilitates muscle repair and adaptation following exercise-induced damage.

    “Protein ingestion after exercise is considered one of the pillars of recovery owing to its role in promoting muscle protein synthesis (MPS), reducing muscle protein breakdown, and facilitating muscle repair and adaptation following exercise-induced damage [51–54].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [51] Moore DR, et al. Beyond muscle hypertrophy: why dietary protein is important for endurance athletes. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2014;39(9):987–97. source
    • cites [52] Doering TM, et al. Postexercise dietary protein strategies to maximize skeletal muscle repair and remodeling in masters endurance athletes: a review. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2016;26(2):168–78. source
    • cites [53] Pasiakos SM, Lieberman HR, McLellan TM. Effects of protein supplements on muscle damage, soreness and recovery of muscle function and physical performance: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2014;44(5):655–70. source
    • cites [54] Tipton KD, Wolfe RR. Protein and amino acids for athletes. J Sports Sci. 2004;22(1):65–79. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Effective post-exercise recovery is critical for restoring physiological homeostasis, repairing muscle damage, replenishing energy stores, and facilitating adaptations that enhance athletic performance.

    “Effective post-exercise recovery is critical for restoring physiological homeostasis, repairing muscle damage, replenishing energy stores, and facilitating adaptations that enhance athletic performance [1].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Kenttä G, Hassmén P. Overtraining and recovery. A conceptual model. Sports Med. 1998;26(1):1–16. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Although high-GI carbohydrate ingestion leads to higher glycogen content after 24 h of recovery, during very short recovery periods the total carbohydrate dose appears more important than the GI.

    “although high-GI carbohydrate ingestion leads to higher glycogen content after 24 h of recovery [27], during very short recovery periods the total carbohydrate dose appears more important than the GI”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Burke LM, Collier GR, Hargreaves M. Muscle glycogen storage after prolonged exercise: effect of the glycemic index of carbohydrate feedings. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993;75(2):1019–23. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mixed results suggest that the type of exercise, its intensity and duration, the specific carbohydrate dosages used, and the glycogen depletion protocols might play critical roles in determining the efficacy of carbohydrate supplementation.

    “These mixed results suggest that the type of exercise, its intensity and duration, the specific carbohydrate dosages used, and the glycogen depletion protocols might play critical roles in determining the efficacy of carbohydrate supplementation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
16 of 16
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The findings from controlled laboratory studies of recovery nutrition are applicable to athletes in real-world competition and training settings with short recovery periods.

    “Evidence supports the tailored use of these nutritional strategies, particularly for athletes managing tight competition/training schedules.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Performance improvements measured in laboratory time trials or capacity tests translate into competitive performance outcomes.

    “However, even a 1% improvement can be critical in elite sports, potentially making the difference between finishing fourth and securing a podium position in Olympic competitions [88].”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The cited studies' participants and protocols are sufficiently comparable to synthesize into general recommendations for athletes.

    “These discrepancies may be attributed to interindividual variations in training status and genetic factors, as well as differences in recovery durations, glycogen depletion protocols, performance tests, amounts and types of protein ingested, and methods of nutrient provision during recovery.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Post-exercise fluid replacement ranges differ

    Major

    The hydration section recommends replacing 125-150% of body mass lost during exercise, while Table 1 advises replacing 150-200% of lost sweat. Although the ranges meet at 150%, they give different recommended amounts above and below that point.

  • Strength-athlete protein recommendation differs from the main text

    Minor

    Table 2 recommends 1.2-1.8 g·kg-1 daily for strength/power athletes, whereas the protein section recommends 1.7-2.2 g·kg-1 for athletes in power-based sports. The table substitutes the endurance-athlete range for the higher power-sport range stated in the text.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 218 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jeukendrup AE, Gleeson M. Sport nutrition. 4th ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2025.
  2. Gough LA, et al. Post-exercise supplementation of sodium bicarbonate improves acid base balance recovery and subsequent high-intensity boxing specific performance. Front Nutr. 2019;6:155. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naderi, A., Rothschild, J. A., Santos, H. O., Hamidvand, A., Koozehchian, M. S., Ghazzagh, A., Berjisian, E., & Podlogar, T.
Affiliations
  • Islamic Azad University Boroujerd Branch (IR)
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
  • Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
  • Jacksonville State University (US)
  • Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Naderi, Alireza
  • Podlogar, Tim
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2025-04-12
Volume
55
Issue
7
Pages
1559-1577
ISSN
  • 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-2035
OpenAlex
W4409384105
Cited by
43
References
218
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 8
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
post-exercise recovery, exercise performance, carbohydrate intake, glycogen resynthesis, protein intake, muscle damage, creatine, caffeine
MeSH terms
Post-Exercise Recovery, Antioxidants, Caffeine, Creatine, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Proteins, Glycogen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review