The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimate of the Optimum Cutoff Frequency for the Butterworth Low-Pass Digital Filter
Abstract
The purposes of this study were (a) to develop a procedure for objectively determining the optimum cutoff frequency for the Butterworth low-pass digital filler, and (b) to evaluate the cutoff frequencies derived from the residual analysis. A set of knee flexion-extension angle data in normal gait was used as the standard data set. The standard data were sampled at different sampling frequencies. Random errors with different magnitudes were added to the standard data to create different sets of raw data with a given sampling frequency. Each raw data set was filtered through a Butterworth low-pass digital filter at different cutoff frequencies. The cutoff frequency corresponding to the minimum error in the second time derivatives for a given set of raw data was considered as the optimum for that set of raw data. A procedure for estimating the optimum cutoff frequency from the sampling frequency and estimated relative mean error in the raw data set was developed. The estimated optimum cutoff frequency significantly correlated to the true optimum cutoff frequency with a correlation determinant value of 0.96. This procedure was applied to estimate the optimum cutoff frequency for another set of kinematic data. The calculated accelerations of the filtered data essentially matched the measured acceleration curve. There is no correlation between the cutoff frequency derived from the residual analysis and the true optimum cutoff frequency. The cutoff frequencies derived from the residual analysis were significantly lower than the optimum, especially when the sampling frequency is high.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Normative data of knee joint motion and ground reaction forces in adult level walking
Chao, E. Y., Laughman, R. K., Schneider, E., & Stauffer, R. N. (1983) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(83)90129-x · Cited by 366
DATA SMOOTHING AND DIFFERENTIATION PROCEDURES IN BIOMECHANICS
Wood, G. A. (1982) · Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews · doi:10.1249/00003677-198201000-00010 · Cited by 172
Cited by
The Role of Rate of Force Development on Vertical Jump Performance
McLellan, C. P., Lovell, D. I., & Gass, G. C. (2011) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181be305c · Cited by 342
Lephart, S. M., Abt, J. P., Ferris, C. M., Sell, T. C., Nagai, T., Myers, J. B., & Irrgang, J. J. (2005) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2005.019083 · Cited by 264
Influence of Averaging Method on Muscle Deoxygenation Interpretation during Repeated-Sprint Exercise
Rodriguez, R. F., Townsend, N. E., Aughey, R. J., & Billaut, F. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.13238 · Cited by 47
Zhao, S., Lindinger, S., Ohtonen, O., & Linnamo, V. (2023) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2023.948919 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, B., Gabriel, D., Noble, L., & An, K.-N.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 318-329
- ISSN
- 1065-8483 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2688
- OpenAlex
- W2171718210
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimate of the Optimum Cutoff Frequency for the Butterworth Low-Pass Digital Filter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1123/jab.15.3.318
- The paper
- Yu, B., Gabriel, D., Noble, L., & An, K.-N. (1999). Estimate of the Optimum Cutoff Frequency for the Butterworth Low-Pass Digital Filter. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.15.3.318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.