Cited by 31Sport Psychology and PerformanceSports and Physical Education ResearchMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Children’s Motor Skill Learning is Influenced by Their Conceptions of Ability

Drews, Ricardo, Chiviacowsky, Suzete, Wulf, Gabriele·2013·Journal of Motor Learning and Development

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of different ability conceptions on motor skills learning in 6-, 10-, and 14-year-old children. In each age group, different groups were given either inherent-ability or acquirable-skill instructions before they began practicing a throwing task. Participants were blindfolded and were asked to throw beanbags at a target placed on the floor at a distance of 3 m. All participants performed 40 practice trials and received feedback about the accuracy of their throws after each trial. One day after practice, retention and transfer (greater target distance) tests without instructions or feedback were conducted to assess learning effects. Older participants generally had higher accuracy scores than younger participants. Importantly, instructions emphasizing the learnability of the skill resulted in greater throwing accuracy on the retention test than did those implying an underlying inherent ability. On the transfer test, the same effect was seen for the 14-year-olds, but not for the younger age groups, suggesting that adolescents may be more vulnerable to the threat of their inherent ability being exposed. The present findings demonstrate the importance of ability conceptions for motor learning in children and adolescents. They also add to the mounting evidence of motivational influences on motor skill learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jmld.1.2.38

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 6-, 10-, and 14-year-old children, instructions suggesting inherent ability before practice led to less effective learning of a throwing task than instructions framing performance as a function of practice.

    “Children of all age groups showed less effective learning of a throwing task when the instructions given before the practice phase suggested that performance was a reflection of an inherent ability rather a function of practice.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 31

Authors
Drews, R., Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G.
Venue
Journal of Motor Learning and Development
Published
2013-06
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
38-44
ISSN
  • 2325-3193 (ISSN-L)
  • 2325-3215
OpenAlex
W2141715773
Cited by
31
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Motor Learning and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
motor skill learning, children, adolescents, throwing accuracy, skill retention, transfer of learning, age differences, motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review