Cited by 46Exercise and Physiological ResponsesCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentPhysical Activity and Health

Recent physical activity in relation to DNA damage and repair using the comet assay

Open access
Cash, Stephanie Whisnant, Beresford, Shirley A.A., Vaughan, Thomas L., Heagerty, Patrick J., Bernstein, Leslie, White, Emily, Neuhouser, Marian L.·2014·Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited evidence suggests that very high-intensity exercise is positively associated with DNA damage but moderate exercise may be associated with DNA repair. METHODS: Participants were 220 healthy, Washington State 50- to 76-year-olds in the validity/biomarker substudy of the VITamins And Lifestyle (VITAL) cohort, who provided blood samples and completed questionnaires assessing recent physical activity and demographic and health factors. Measures included nested activity subsets: total activity, moderate- plus high-intensity activity, and high-intensity activity. DNA damage (n = 122) and repair (n = 99) were measured using the comet assay. Multivariate linear regression was used to estimate regression coefficients and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for relationships between MET-hours per week of activity and each DNA outcome (damage, and 15- and 60-minute repair capacities). RESULTS: DNA damage was not associated with any measure of activity. However, 60-minute DNA repair was positively associated with both total activity (β = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.0057-0.412; P = .044) and high-intensity activity (β = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.20-0.60; P = .036), adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and current multivitamin use. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to assess broad ranges of activity intensity levels related to DNA damage and repair. Physical activity was unrelated to DNA damage but was associated with increased repair.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jpah.2012-0278

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans, a cross-sectional study of approximately 100 healthy women and men aged 50-72 yr did not show an association between self-reported physical activity and DNA damage measured via comet assay.

    “In humans, a cross-sectional study of approximately 100 healthy women and men aged 50–72 yr did not show an association between self-reported physical activity and DNA damage (measured via comet assay), but reported a positive association between both physical activity and high-intensity physical activity (metabolic equivalent task (MET) values ≥6) and DNA repair in lymphocytes (15).”
  • In that study, both physical activity and high-intensity physical activity (MET values ≥6) were positively associated with DNA repair in lymphocytes.

    “In humans, a cross-sectional study of approximately 100 healthy women and men aged 50–72 yr did not show an association between self-reported physical activity and DNA damage (measured via comet assay), but reported a positive association between both physical activity and high-intensity physical activity (metabolic equivalent task (MET) values ≥6) and DNA repair in lymphocytes (15).”
  • The combination of moderate- and high-intensity activity (MET values ≥4) was associated with a trend for 25% higher DNA repair.

    “The combination of moderate- and high-intensity activity (activities with MET values ≥4) also was associated with a trend for 25% higher DNA repair.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [4]McTiernan A Kooperberg C White E Recreational physical activity and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative Cohort Study JAMA 9 10 2003 290 10 1331 1336 12966124
  2. [7]Monninkhof EM Elias SG Vlems FA Physical activity and breast cancer: a systematic review Epidemiology 1 2007 18 1 137 157 17130685
  3. [37]Olive PL Banath JP Durand RE Heterogeneity in radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in tumor and normal cells measured using the “comet” assay Radiat Res 4 1990 122 1 86 94 2320728
  4. [42]Garaj-Vrhovac V Zeljezic D Evaluation of DNA damage in workers occupationally exposed to pesticides using single-cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) assay. Pesticide genotoxicity revealed by comet assay Mutat Res 9 20 2000 469 2 279 285 10984689
  5. [47]Tomasello B Malfa G Galvano F Renis M DNA damage in normal-weight obese syndrome measured by Comet assay Mediterranean Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism 2011 4 2 99 104

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cash, S. W., Beresford, S. A. A., Vaughan, T. L., Heagerty, P. J., Bernstein, L., White, E., & Neuhouser, M. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Physical Activity and Health
Published
2014-05
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
770-776
ISSN
  • 1543-3080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-5474
OpenAlex
W2135798904
Cited by
46
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Physical Activity and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Washington State University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R03CA105336, R01CA074846, K05CA136967, R25CA092408, K05CA154337, R01 CA 74846, K05CA124911)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
physical activity, DNA damage, DNA repair, high-intensity exercise, moderate-intensity exercise, exercise intensity, DNA repair capacity, older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Washington, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Comet Assay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review