Cited by 30Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Increase in Daily Steps After an Exercise Specialist Led Lifestyle Intervention for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes In Primary Care: A Controlled Implementation Trial

Johnson, Steven T., Mundt, Clark, Qiu, Weiyu, Soprovich, Allison, Wozniak, Lisa, Plotnikoff, Ronald C., Johnson, Jeffrey A.·2015·Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of an exercise specialist led lifestyle program for adults with type 2 diabetes in primary care. METHODS: Eligible participants from 4 primary care networks in Alberta, Canada were assigned to either a lifestyle program or a control group. The program targeted increased daily walking through individualized daily pedometer step goals for the first 3 months and brisk walking speed, along with substitution of low-relative to high-glycemic index foods over the next 3 months. The outcomes were daily steps, diet, and clinical markers, and were compared using random effects models. RESULTS: 198 participants were enrolled (102 in the intervention and 96 in the control). For all participants, (51% were women), mean age 59.5 (SD 8.3) years, A1c 6.8% (SD 1.1), BMI 33.6 kg/m(2) (SD 6.5), systolic BP 125.6 mmHg (SD 16.2), glycemic index 51.7 (4.6), daily steps 5879 (SD 3130). Daily steps increased for the intervention compared with the control at 3-months (1292 [SD 2698] vs. 418 [SD 2458] and 6-months (1481 [SD 2631] vs. 336 [SD 2712]; adjusted P = .002). No significant differences were observed for diet or clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A 6-month lifestyle program delivered in primary care by an exercise specialist can be effective for increasing daily walking among adults with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. This short-term increase in daily steps requires longer follow-up to estimate the potential impact on health outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jpah.2014-0200

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, S. T., Mundt, C., Qiu, W., Soprovich, A., Wozniak, L., Plotnikoff, R. C., & Johnson, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Athabasca University (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Venue
Journal of Physical Activity and Health
Published
2015-11
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
1492-1499
ISSN
  • 1543-3080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-5474
OpenAlex
W2001438078
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Physical Activity and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, lifestyle intervention, daily step count, walking, brisk walking, glycemic index, diet, exercise specialists, primary care, physical activity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alberta, Blood Pressure, Canada, Combined Modality Therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Diabetic, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Exercise, Walking, Actigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review