Cited by 80Physical Activity and HealthHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesUrban Transport and Accessibility

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Impact of Dog Walking on Leisure-Time Physical Activity: Results From a Population-Based Survey of Michigan Adults

Reeves, Mathew J., Rafferty, Ann P., Miller, Corinne E., Lyon-Callo, Sarah K.·2011·Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Abstract

Background: The extent to which dog walking promotes leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) remains unresolved. We describe the characteristics of people who walk their dog, and assess the impact on LTPA. Methods: Information on dog ownership, dog walking patterns, total walking activity and LTPA were assessed in the 2005 Michigan Behavioral Risk Factor Survey. Multiple logistic regression was used to generate adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for the effect of dog walking on total walking and LTPA. Results: Of 5902 respondents 41% owned a dog, and of these, 61% walked their dog for at least 10 minutes at a time. However, only 27% walked their dog at least 150 minutes per week. Dog walking was associated with a significant increase in walking activity and LTPA. Compared with non-dog owners, the odds of obtaining at least 150 minutes per week of total walking were 34% higher for dog walkers (AOR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.59), and the odds of doing any LTPA were 69% higher (AOR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.33 to 2.15). Conclusions: Dog walking was associated with more walking and LTPA, however a substantial proportion of dog owners do not walk their dog. The promotion of dog walking could help increase LTPA.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jpah.8.3.436

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an investigation of 5902 individuals in the US, there was a positive relationship between dog walking and amount of total walking time; dog owners were more likely to walk at least 150 minutes a week (O.R. 1.69; 95% CI 1.13-1.59) and were more likely to involve themselves in any physical activity during leisure time (O.R. 1.69; 95% CI 1.33-2.15).

    “An investigation of 5902 individuals in the US noted a positive relationship between dog walking and amount of total walking time [41]. Dog owners were more likely to walk at least 150 minutes a week (O.R. 1.69; 95% CI 1.13–1.59) and were more likely to involve themselves in any physical activity during leisure time (O.R. 1.69; 95% CI 1.33–2.15).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Reeves, M. J., Rafferty, A. P., Miller, C. E., & Lyon-Callo, S. K.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (US)
Venue
Journal of Physical Activity and Health
Published
2011-03
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
436-444
ISSN
  • 1543-3080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-5474
OpenAlex
W2101387741
Cited by
80
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Physical Activity and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
dog walking, leisure-time physical activity, dog ownership, walking activity, physical activity promotion, adults, Michigan
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Animals, Dogs, Female, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Michigan, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Walking, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Young Adult, Pets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review