The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-Education of Muscle Strength Is Greater with Stimulated than Voluntary Contractions
Abstract
Cross-education enhances the performance of muscles not directly involved in the chronic conditioning of the muscles in a remote limb. Substantial cross-education occurs after training with eccentric contractions or with contractions evoked by electromyostimulation (EMS). Since during EMS and eccentric contractions, skin and muscle afferents are activated that have excitatory effects on contralateral homologous muscles, it was hypothesized that exercise training with stimulated vs. voluntary eccentric contractions would lead to greater cross-education. Thirty-two women were randomly assigned to a voluntary (Vol), an EMS, or a remote EMS (rEMS) exercise group and performed 840 voluntary or stimulated eccentric contractions over 6 weeks. All subjects, including nonexercising controls (Con), were tested pre- and posttraining for maximal voluntary and stimulated isometric and eccentric quadriceps strength. Ipsilateral voluntary and stimulated forces increased in all groups. Changes in EMG activity paralleled those in voluntary force in each limb. No changes occurred in grip strength. The greater contra- and ipsilateral strength gains after EMS training were most likely related to an additive effect of EMS and muscle lengthening.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Positive adaptations to weight-lifting training in the elderly
Brown, A. B., McCartney, N., & Sale, D. G. (1990) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1990.69.5.1725 · Cited by 360
Cited by
Folland, J. P., & Williams, A. G. (2007) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200737020-00004 · Cited by 1,347
Contralateral effects of unilateral strength training: evidence and possible mechanisms
Carroll, T. J., Herbert, R. D., Munn, J., Lee, M., & Gandevia, S. C. (2006) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00531.2006 · Cited by 499
Contralateral effects of unilateral resistance training: a meta-analysis.
Munn, J., Herbert, R. D., & Gandevia, S. C. (2004) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00541.2003 · Cited by 296
Cross-education of muscular strength following unilateral resistance training: a meta-analysis.
Manca, A., Dragone, D., Dvir, Z., & Deriu, F. (2017) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-017-3720-z · Cited by 162
Neural Adaptations with Chronic Activity Patterns in Able-Bodied Humans
Duchateau, J., & Enoka, R. M. (2002) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00002060-200211001-00004 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Hortobágyi, T., Scott, K., Lambert, J., Hamilton, G., & Tracy, J.
- Venue
- Motor Control
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-219
- ISSN
- 1087-1640 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2696
- OpenAlex
- W2161094138
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-Education of Muscle Strength Is Greater with Stimulated than Voluntary Contractions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1123/mcj.3.2.205
- The paper
- Hortobágyi, T., Scott, K., Lambert, J., Hamilton, G., & Tracy, J. (1999). Cross-Education of Muscle Strength Is Greater with Stimulated than Voluntary Contractions. Motor Control. https://doi.org/10.1123/mcj.3.2.205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.