The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accepting the Risks of Pain and Injury in Sport: Mediated Cultural Influences on Playing Hurt
Abstract
This paper considers the nature and implications of cultural messages about risk, pain, injury, and comebacks in sport that are mediated by a popular American sports magazine. The analysis is based on evidence from a content analysis of Sports Illustrated articles, the results of which suggest that athletes are exposed to a set of mediated beliefs about structural constraints, structural inducements, general cultural values, and processes of institutional rationalization and athletic socialization that collectively convey the message that they ought to accept the risks, pain, and injuries of sport.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The findings suggest athletes identify with a set of values and beliefs to accept risk and pain in sport, due to the nature and implications of culture and social messaging [77].”
From What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Frey, J.H. (1991). Social risk and the meaning of sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8, 136-145.
- Good, M.J.D., Brodwin, P.E., Good, B.J., & Kleinman, A. (Eds.) (1992). Pain as human experience: An anthropological perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Guttmann, A. (1988). A whole new ball game: An interpretation of American sports. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
- Messner, M.A. (1990). When bodies are weapons: Masculinity and violence in sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 25, 203-220.
- Messner, M.A. (1992). Power at play: Sports and the problem of masculinity. Boston: Beacon Press.
- Morris, D.B. (1991). The culture of pain. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Munson, L. (1991, March 1-3). Main event: The scrap heap. The National Sports Daily, pp. 30-34.
- Nixon, H.L., I1 (1984). Sport and the American dream. Champaign, IL: Leisure Press.
- Nixon, H.L., I1 (1989). Reconsidering obligatory running and anorexia nervosa as gender- related problems of identity and role adjustment. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 13, 14-24.
- Shaw, G. (1972). Meat on the hoof: The hidden world of Texas football. New York: St. Martin's Press.
- Snyder, E.E. (1990). Emotion and sport: A case study of collegiate women gymnasts. Sociology of Sport Journal, 7, 254-270.
- White, H.C. (1992). Identity and control: A structural theory of social action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Young, K. (1991). Violence in the workplace of professional sport from victimological and cultural studies perspectives. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 26, 3-14. Appendix A Sports Illustrated References (by Date of Publication)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chapman, M., Thomas, M., & Thompson, K. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122222 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Nixon, H. L.
- Affiliations
- 1Appalachian State University
- Venue
- Sociology of Sport Journal
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-196
- ISSN
- 0741-1235
- 1543-2785
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review