Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Accepting the Risks of Pain and Injury in Sport: Mediated Cultural Influences on Playing Hurt

Nixon, Howard L.·1993·Sociology of Sport Journal

Abstract

This paper considers the nature and implications of cultural messages about risk, pain, injury, and comebacks in sport that are mediated by a popular American sports magazine. The analysis is based on evidence from a content analysis of Sports Illustrated articles, the results of which suggest that athletes are exposed to a set of mediated beliefs about structural constraints, structural inducements, general cultural values, and processes of institutional rationalization and athletic socialization that collectively convey the message that they ought to accept the risks, pain, and injuries of sport.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ssj.10.2.183

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Frey, J.H. (1991). Social risk and the meaning of sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8, 136-145.
  2. Good, M.J.D., Brodwin, P.E., Good, B.J., & Kleinman, A. (Eds.) (1992). Pain as human experience: An anthropological perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  3. Guttmann, A. (1988). A whole new ball game: An interpretation of American sports. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  4. Messner, M.A. (1990). When bodies are weapons: Masculinity and violence in sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 25, 203-220.
  5. Messner, M.A. (1992). Power at play: Sports and the problem of masculinity. Boston: Beacon Press.
  6. Morris, D.B. (1991). The culture of pain. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  7. Munson, L. (1991, March 1-3). Main event: The scrap heap. The National Sports Daily, pp. 30-34.
  8. Nixon, H.L., I1 (1984). Sport and the American dream. Champaign, IL: Leisure Press.
  9. Nixon, H.L., I1 (1989). Reconsidering obligatory running and anorexia nervosa as gender- related problems of identity and role adjustment. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 13, 14-24.
  10. Shaw, G. (1972). Meat on the hoof: The hidden world of Texas football. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  11. Snyder, E.E. (1990). Emotion and sport: A case study of collegiate women gymnasts. Sociology of Sport Journal, 7, 254-270.
  12. White, H.C. (1992). Identity and control: A structural theory of social action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  13. Young, K. (1991). Violence in the workplace of professional sport from victimological and cultural studies perspectives. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 26, 3-14. Appendix A Sports Illustrated References (by Date of Publication)

Metadata

Authors
Nixon, H. L.
Affiliations
1Appalachian State University
Venue
Sociology of Sport Journal
Published
1993-06
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
183-196
ISSN
  • 0741-1235
  • 1543-2785
Cited by
189
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review