Cited by 52Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsDrug Solubulity and Delivery Systems

Quantitative Prediction of Intestinal Metabolism in Humans from a Simplified Intestinal Availability Model and Empirical Scaling Factor

Kadono, Keitaro, Akabane, Takafumi, Tabata, Kenji, Gato, Katsuhiko, Terashita, Shigeyuki, Teramura, Toshio·2010·Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Abstract

This study aimed to establish a practical and convenient method of predicting intestinal availability (F(g)) in humans for highly permeable compounds at the drug discovery stage, with a focus on CYP3A4-mediated metabolism. We constructed a "simplified F(g) model," described using only metabolic parameters, assuming that passive diffusion is dominant when permeability is high and that the effect of transporters in epithelial cells is negligible. Five substrates for CYP3A4 (alprazolam, amlodipine, clonazepam, midazolam, and nifedipine) and four for both CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) (nicardipine, quinidine, tacrolimus, and verapamil) were used as model compounds. Observed fraction of drug absorbed (F(a)F(g)) values for these compounds were calculated from in vivo pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, whereas in vitro intestinal intrinsic clearance (CL(int,intestine)) was determined using human intestinal microsomes. The CL(int,intestine) for the model compounds corrected with that of midazolam was defined as CL(m,index) and incorporated into a simplified F(g) model with empirical scaling factor. Regardless of whether the compound was a P-gp substrate, the F(a)F(g) could be reasonably fitted by the simplified F(g) model, and the value of the empirical scaling factor was well estimated. These results suggest that the effects of P-gp on F(a) and F(g) are substantially minor, at least in the case of highly permeable compounds. Furthermore, liver intrinsic clearance (CL(int,liver)) can be used as a surrogate index of intestinal metabolism based on the relationship between CL(int,liver) and CL(m,index). F(g) can be easily predicted using a simplified F(g) model with the empirical scaling factor, enabling more confident selection of drug candidates with desirable PK profiles in humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/dmd.109.029322

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Kadono, K., Akabane, T., Tabata, K., Gato, K., Terashita, S., & Teramura, T.
Affiliations
Astellas Pharma (Japan) (JP)
Venue
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
1230-1237
ISSN
0090-9556 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144062256
Cited by
52
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
Keywords
intestinal metabolism, CYP3A4, P-glycoprotein, drug absorption prediction, pharmacokinetics, drug discovery
MeSH terms
Biological Availability, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Forecasting, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Microsomes, Models, Theoretical, Permeability, Pharmacokinetics, ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1, Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review