Extensive intestinal first-pass elimination and predominant hepatic distribution of berberine explain its low plasma levels in rats
Abstract
Berberine, one of the most commonly used natural products, exhibits a poor plasma concentration-effect relationship whose underlying mechanisms remain largely unclear. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that extensive first-pass elimination and abundant tissue distribution of berberine may be its specific pharmacokinetic properties. For that, four different dosing routes, intragastric, intraduodenal, intraportal, and intravenous, were used to investigate the gastric, intestinal, and hepatic first-pass elimination of berberine. After intragastric dosing, approximately half of berberine ran intact through the gastrointestinal tract and another half was disposed of by the small intestine, leading to an extremely low extent of absolute oral bioavailability in rats (0.36%). Moreover, the major berberine metabolites were identified and quantified in rat enterocyte S9 fractions, portal vein plasma, and intestinal perfusates; plasma concentrations and tissue distribution of berberine and its major metabolites were determined as well. Data indicated that M1, M2 glucuronide, and M3 were the major metabolites generated from the small intestine and that there was a 70-fold increase in the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve value for berberine (liver versus plasma). We conclude that intestinal first-pass elimination of berberine is the major barrier of its oral bioavailability and that its high extraction and distribution in the liver could be other important factors that lead to its low plasma levels in rats.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Absolute oral bioavailability of berberine is below 1% in rats and below a few percent in humans.
“The absolute oral bioavailability of berberine is very low, estimated to be below 1% in rats and below a few percent in humans [48,49,50]”
From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
Low bioavailability of berberine is a consequence of P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux and extensive intestinal and hepatic first-pass metabolism.
“a consequence of its physicochemical properties and of the limited absorption consistently documented in the literature [51,52,53] of P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux and of extensive intestinal and hepatic first-pass metabolism [48,54,55].”
From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
Berberine reaches high intraluminal and enterocytic concentrations, at the level where absorption and first-pass metabolism of orally administered drugs occur.
“berberine reaches high intraluminal and enterocytic concentrations, exactly at the level where absorption and first-pass metabolism of orally administered drugs occur [48,54].”
From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
Quantifying the local exposure that matters for interactions cannot be inferred from plasma concentrations but requires dedicated methods.
“Quantifying the local exposure that truly matters for interactions cannot be inferred from plasma concentrations but requires dedicated methods [48,62].”
From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
Low systemic exposure does not protect against interactions; rather, it shifts their site toward the absorption and elimination interfaces, where local concentrations are high.
“In summary, low systemic exposure does not protect against interactions; rather, it shifts their site toward the absorption and elimination interfaces, where local concentrations are high (Figure 1) [37,43,48].”
From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
The quality and transferability of each piece of evidence were appraised qualitatively, bearing in mind that, in preclinical models, berberine concentrations may exceed human systemic exposure.
“The quality and transferability of each piece of evidence were appraised qualitatively, bearing in mind that, in preclinical models, berberine concentrations may exceed human systemic exposure [48,68].”
From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
An important part of the mechanistic evidence comes from in vitro and preclinical studies, in which berberine concentrations may exceed human systemic exposure; the clinical transferability of these data must therefore be interpreted with caution.
“An important part of the mechanistic evidence comes from in vitro and preclinical studies, in which berberine concentrations may exceed human systemic exposure [48,68]; the clinical transferability of these data must therefore be interpreted with caution [64,68].”
From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
The translational gap is constitutive of the field: in vitro concentrations that produce inhibition exceed human plasma concentrations by two to four orders of magnitude; local concentrations that would bridge the gap have been calculated but not measured in humans; PBPK models that would connect the two have not been validated against clinical data for berberine; and the human endpoints available
“The in vitro concentrations that produce inhibition exceed human plasma concentrations by two to four orders of magnitude, as Section 2.1 sets out; the local concentrations that would bridge the gap have been calculated but not measured in humans; the PBPK models that would connect the two have not been validated against clinical data for berberine; and the human endpoints available are surrogates”
From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 356
- Authors
- Liu, Y.-T., Hao, H.-P., Xie, H.-G., Lai, L., Wang, Q., Liu, C.-X., & Wang, G.-J.
- ORCID
- Wang, Qiong
- Venue
- Drug Metabolism and Disposition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1779-1784
- ISSN
- 0090-9556 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148293348
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Drug Metabolism and Disposition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Berberine and alkaloids research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Keywords
- berberine, first-pass elimination, intestinal metabolism, oral bioavailability, glucuronide conjugates, tissue distribution, plasma concentration, rats
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Animals, Berberine, Chromatography, Liquid, Injections, Intravenous, Intestine, Small, Liver, Male, Perfusion, Subcellular Fractions, Tissue Distribution, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Area Under Curve, Enterocytes, Metabolic Detoxication, Phase I, Rats, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review