Cited by 107Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchPesticide Exposure and ToxicityNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Sulfone Metabolite of Fipronil Blocks γ-Aminobutyric Acid- and Glutamate-Activated Chloride Channels in Mammalian and Insect Neurons

Zhao, Xilong, Yeh, Jay Z., Salgado, Vincent L., Narahashi, Toshio·2005·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

Fipronil sulfone, a major metabolite of fipronil in both insects and mammals, binds strongly to GABA receptors and is thought to play a significant role in poisoning by fipronil. To better understand the mechanism of selective insecticidal action of fipronil, we examined the effects of its sulfone metabolite on GABA- and glutamate-activated chloride channels (GluCls) in cockroach thoracic ganglion neurons and on GABA(A) receptors in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Fipronil sulfone blocked both desensitizing and nondesensitizing GluCls in the cockroach. Activation was required for block and unblock of desensitizing GluCls. In contrast, activation was not prerequisite for block and unblock of nondesensitizing channels. After repetitive activation of the receptors, the IC50 of fipronil sulfone to block the desensitizing GluCls was reduced from 350 to 25 nM and that for blocking nondesensitizing GluCls was reduced from 31.2 to 8.8 nM. This use-dependent block may be explained by its slow unbinding rate. In cockroach and rat neurons, fipronil sulfone blocked GABA receptors in both activated and resting states, with IC50 values ranging from 20 to 70 nM. In conclusion, although fipronil sulfone is a potent inhibitor of cockroach GABA receptors, desensitizing and nondesensitizing GluCls, and rat GABA(A) receptors, its selective toxicity in insects over mammals appears to be associated with its potent blocking action on both desensitizing a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/jpet.104.077891

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 31 · Cited by 107

Authors
Zhao, X., Yeh, J. Z., Salgado, V. L., & Narahashi, T.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
314
Issue
1
Pages
363-373
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077766424
Cited by
107
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-14143, R01NS014143)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
fipronil sulfone, fipronil, insecticide metabolites, GABA receptors, GABAA receptor, glutamate-gated chloride channels, use-dependent block, dorsal root ganglion neurons, insecticide selectivity, insect neurotoxicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Cockroaches, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Ganglia, Spinal, Insecticides, Insecta, Kinetics, Membrane Potentials, Neurons, Pyrazoles, Receptors, GABA-A, Sulfones, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, GABA, Chloride Channels, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Glutamic Acid, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review