Cited by 36Liver Diseases and ImmunityDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsLiver physiology and pathology

All-Trans-Retinoic Acid Improves Cholestasis in α-Naphthylisothiocyanate–Treated Rats and Mdr2−/− Mice

Open access
Cai, Shi-Ying, Mennone, Albert, Soroka, Carol J., Boyer, James L.·2014·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

Chronic cholestasis results in liver injury and eventually liver failure. Although ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) showed limited benefits in primary biliary cirrhosis, there is an urgent need to develop alternative therapy for chronic cholestatic disorders. Previous studies from our laboratory demonstrated that all-trans-retinoic acid (atRA) is a potent suppressor of CYP7A1, the rate-limiting enzyme in bile acid synthesis. atRA also repressed the expression of tumor growth factor-β and collagen 1A1 in activated primary human stellate cells and LX2 cells. When administered together with UDCA to bile duct-ligated rats, this combined therapy significantly reduced the bile acid pool size and improved liver conditions. To further examine whether atRA alone or in combination with UDCA has greater beneficial effects than UDCA treatment alone, we assessed this treatment in two additional chronic cholestatic rodent models: α-naphthylisothiocyanate (ANIT)-treated rats and the Mdr2(-/-) (Abcb4(-/-)) knockout mouse. atRA alone significantly reduced bile duct proliferation, inflammation, and hydroxyproline levels in ANIT-treated rats, whereas the combination of atRA and UDCA significantly reduced plasma bile salt level compared with UDCA treatment. atRA alone or in combination with UDCA significantly reduced plasma levels of alkaline phosphatase and bile salts in 12-week-old Mdr2(-/-) mice. Reduced bile duct proliferation and inflammation were also observed in the livers of these mice. Together, atRA alone or in combination with UDCA significantly reduced the severity of liver injury in these two animal models, further supporting the combination treatment of atRA and UDCA as a potential new therapy for patients with chronic cholestatic liver disease who have not responded fully to UDCA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/jpet.113.209353

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Administration of atRAs in vitro to HSCs and in vivo in cholestatic animal models is linked to inhibition of pro-fibrotic gene expression such as TGF-β, col1α1, αSMA and MMP-2, and to protective properties regarding ECM accumulation.

    “the administration of atRAs in vitro to HSCs and in vivo in cholestatic animal models was linked to an inhibition of pro-fibrotic gene expression (TGF-β, col1α1, αSMA, and MMP-2) [179][180][181][182] and showed protective properties in regard to ECM accumulation.[183][184][185]”

    From Nuclear receptors in liver fibrosis (2021) · cites this paper as [181]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, S.-Y., Mennone, A., Soroka, C. J., & Boyer, J. L.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
349
Issue
1
Pages
94-98
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157121141
Cited by
36
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30 DK 34989, R37 DK-25636, R37DK025636, P30DK034989)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
all-trans retinoic acid, chronic cholestasis, ursodeoxycholic acid, alpha-naphthylisothiocyanate, Mdr2 knockout mice, bile acid synthesis, CYP7A1, bile duct proliferation, liver injury, combination therapy, primary biliary cirrhosis
MeSH terms
ATP-Binding Cassette Sub-Family B Member 4, Animals, Bile Acids and Salts, Cholagogues and Choleretics, Cholestasis, Chronic Disease, Disease Models, Animal, Drug Therapy, Combination, Liver, Male, Tretinoin, Ursodeoxycholic Acid, 1-Naphthylisothiocyanate, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Mice, Knockout, ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review