Evidence for Direct Protein Kinase-C Mediated Modulation of N-Methyl-d-aspartate Receptor Current
Abstract
Protein kinase-C (PKC) activation differentially affects currents from N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) type glutamate receptors depending upon their subunit composition. Experiments using chimeras initially indicated that the cytoplasmic C-terminal tails of NR2B (responsive to PKC) and NR2C (unresponsive to PKC) subunits contain the amino acid residues responsible for the observed disparity of PKC effects. However, truncation and point mutation experiments have suggested that PKC action on NMDA receptors may be entirely indirect, working via the phosphorylation of associated proteins. Here we suggest that PKC does, in fact, affect NR2B/NR1-011 NMDA currents by direct phosphorylation of the NR2B tail at residues S1303 and S1323. Replacement of either of these residues with Ala severely reduces PKC potentiation. To verify that S1303 and S1323 are sites of direct phosphorylation by PKC, synthetic peptides from the regions surrounding these sites were used as substrates for in vitro assays with purified rat brain PKC. These results indicate that PKC can directly phosphorylate S1303 and S1323 in the NR2B C terminus, leading to enhanced currents through NMDA receptor channels. The direct action of PKC on certain NMDA receptor subtypes may be important in any physiological or pathological process where PKC and NR2B/NR1 receptors interact.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Phosphorylation of S1303 in heterologous cells enhances NMDAR current.
“Phosphorylation of S1303 in heterologous cells enhances NMDAR current (127, 128)”
From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [127]
Cites
The essential role of hippocampal CA1 NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in spatial memory.
Tsien, J. Z., Huerta, P. T., & Tonegawa, S. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81827-9 · Cited by 1,782 · see citing works
Patterned Activity, Synaptic Convergence, and the NMDA Receptor in Developing Visual Pathways
Constantine-Paton, M., Cline, H. T., & Debski, E. (1990) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.001021 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Molecular mechanisms underlying emotional learning and memory in the lateral amygdala
Rodrigues, S. M., Schafe, G. E., & LeDoux, J. E. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.014 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
N-Methyl-d-aspartate receptor subtypes: multiple roles in excitotoxicity and neurological disease
Waxman, E. A., & Lynch, D. R. (2005) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858404269012 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Presynaptic serotonin 2A receptors modulate thalamocortical plasticity and associative learning
Barre, A., Berthoux, C., De Bundel, D., Valjent, E., Bockaert, J., Marin, P., & Bécamel, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1525586113 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Nicoll, R. A., & Schulman, H. (2023) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00034.2022 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
“Phosphorylation of S1303 in heterologous cells enhances NMDAR current (127, 128) and reduces desensitization of GluN2B-containing receptors (129).”
BackgroundSNAP-25 is a target of protein kinase C phosphorylation critical to NMDA receptor trafficking
Lau, C. G., Takayasu, Y., Rodenas-Ruano, A., Paternain, A. V., Lerma, J., Bennett, M. V. L., & Zukin, R. S. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4933-08.2010 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Wang, W., Rein, B., Zhang, F., Tan, T., Zhong, P., Qin, L., & Yan, Z. (2018) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0149-18.2018 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Warnet, X. L., Bakke Krog, H., Sevillano‐Quispe, O. G., Poulsen, H., & Kjaergaard, M. (2021) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.14842 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Tewari, S., & Parpura, V. (2013) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2013.00145 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liao, G.-Y., Wagner, D. A., Hsu, M. H., & Leonard, J. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Venue
- Molecular Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-05-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 960-964
- ISSN
- 0026-895X (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0111
- OpenAlex
- W2148365115
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ns031962-03)
- University of Illinois at Chicago
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01-NS31962-02)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Keywords
- protein kinase C, NMDA receptor, NR2B subunit, NR1 subunit, receptor phosphorylation, C-terminal tail, receptor modulation, chimeras, point mutations
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Electrophysiology, Oocytes, Phosphorylation, Protein Kinase C, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Serine, Substrate Specificity, Transfection, Xenopus laevis, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review