Cited by 192Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Evidence for Direct Protein Kinase-C Mediated Modulation of N-Methyl-d-aspartate Receptor Current

Liao, Guey-Ying, Wagner, David A., Hsu, Michael H., Leonard, John P.·2001·Molecular Pharmacology

Abstract

Protein kinase-C (PKC) activation differentially affects currents from N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) type glutamate receptors depending upon their subunit composition. Experiments using chimeras initially indicated that the cytoplasmic C-terminal tails of NR2B (responsive to PKC) and NR2C (unresponsive to PKC) subunits contain the amino acid residues responsible for the observed disparity of PKC effects. However, truncation and point mutation experiments have suggested that PKC action on NMDA receptors may be entirely indirect, working via the phosphorylation of associated proteins. Here we suggest that PKC does, in fact, affect NR2B/NR1-011 NMDA currents by direct phosphorylation of the NR2B tail at residues S1303 and S1323. Replacement of either of these residues with Ala severely reduces PKC potentiation. To verify that S1303 and S1323 are sites of direct phosphorylation by PKC, synthetic peptides from the regions surrounding these sites were used as substrates for in vitro assays with purified rat brain PKC. These results indicate that PKC can directly phosphorylate S1303 and S1323 in the NR2B C terminus, leading to enhanced currents through NMDA receptor channels. The direct action of PKC on certain NMDA receptor subtypes may be important in any physiological or pathological process where PKC and NR2B/NR1 receptors interact.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/mol.59.5.960

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phosphorylation of S1303 in heterologous cells enhances NMDAR current.

    “Phosphorylation of S1303 in heterologous cells enhances NMDAR current (127, 128)”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [127]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liao, G.-Y., Wagner, D. A., Hsu, M. H., & Leonard, J. P.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
Molecular Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-05-01
Volume
59
Issue
5
Pages
960-964
ISSN
  • 0026-895X (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0111
OpenAlex
W2148365115
Cited by
192
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns031962-03)
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01-NS31962-02)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
protein kinase C, NMDA receptor, NR2B subunit, NR1 subunit, receptor phosphorylation, C-terminal tail, receptor modulation, chimeras, point mutations
MeSH terms
Animals, Electrophysiology, Oocytes, Phosphorylation, Protein Kinase C, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Serine, Substrate Specificity, Transfection, Xenopus laevis, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review