Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 268 of the 268 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Systematic Comparison of the Properties of Clinically Used Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonists

Michel, Martin C., Foster, Carolyn, Brunner, Hans R., Liu, Lisheng·2013·Pharmacological Reviews

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/pr.112.007278

Cites

268 of 268 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 268 references

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Michel, M. C., Foster, C., Brunner, H. R., & Liu, L.
Venue
Pharmacological Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
809-848
ISSN
0031-6997 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097957153
Cited by
301
References
268
FWCI
18.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Comparison of the Properties of Clinically Used Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1124/pr.112.007278
The paper
Michel, M. C., Foster, C., Brunner, H. R., & Liu, L. (2013). A Systematic Comparison of the Properties of Clinically Used Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonists. Pharmacological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007278

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.