Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,938

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

SOME QUANTITATIVE USES OF DRUG ANTAGONISTS

Open access
ARUNLAKSHANA, O., SCHILD, H. O.·1959·British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Various applications of p A x measurements are discussed based on the hypothesis that drugs and drug antagonists compete for receptors according to the mass law. Examples are given illustrating the use of p A x measurements to identify agonists which act on the same receptors and to compare the receptors of different tissues. Tests of competitive and noncompetitive antagonism are considered in relation to the antagonisms acetylcholine‐atropine, histamine‐atropine and acetylcholine‐cinchonidine. A new measure, p A h, is introduced to express the activity of unsurmountable antagonists.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1959.tb00928.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 3,938

Metadata

Authors
ARUNLAKSHANA, O., & SCHILD, H. O.
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1959-03
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
48-58
ISSN
0366-0826 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057971042
Cited by
3,938
References
0
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SOME QUANTITATIVE USES OF DRUG ANTAGONISTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1959.tb00928.x
The paper
ARUNLAKSHANA, O., & SCHILD, H. O. (1959). SOME QUANTITATIVE USES OF DRUG ANTAGONISTS. British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1959.tb00928.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.