Cited by 119Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingCellular transport and secretionProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases

RAL GTPases: Biology and Potential as Therapeutic Targets in Cancer

Open access
Yan, Chao, Theodorescu, Dan·2018·Pharmacological Reviews

Abstract

More than a hundred proteins comprise the RAS superfamily of small GTPases. This family can be divided into RAS, RHO, RAB, RAN, ARF, and RAD subfamilies, with each shown to play distinct roles in human cells in both health and disease. The RAS subfamily has a well-established role in human cancer with the three genes, HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS being the commonly mutated in tumors. These RAS mutations, most often functionally activating, are especially common in pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancers. Efforts to inhibit RAS and related GTPases have produced inhibitors targeting the downstream effectors of RAS signaling, including inhibitors of the RAF-mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK)-ERK kinase pathway and the phosphoinositide-3-kinase-AKT-mTOR kinase pathway. A third effector arm of RAS signaling, mediated by RAL (RAS like) has emerged in recent years as a critical driver of RAS oncogenic signaling and has not been targeted until recently. RAL belongs to the RAS branch of the RAS superfamily and shares a high structural similarity with RAS. In human cells, there are two genes, RALA and RALB, both of which have been shown to play roles in the proliferation, survival, and metastasis of a variety of human cancers, including lung, colon, pancreatic, prostate, skin, and bladder cancers. In this review, we summarize the latest knowledge of RAL in the context of human cancer and the recent advancements in the development of cancer therapeutics targeting RAL small GTPases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/pr.117.014415

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reps1, Ralbp1, and RalA are all implicated in a range of physiological and pathological processes.

    “Reps1, Ralbp1, and RalA are all implicated in a range of physiological and pathological processes (10, 61, 62).”

    From Regulation of cargo exocytosis by a Reps1-Ralbp1-RalA module (2023) · cites this paper as [10]

    The RAL Binding Protein 1/RLIP76 section describes RALBP1’s roles in endocytosis and cancer-cell migration, and identifies REPS1 as a protein involved in receptor-mediated endocytosis. The RAL in Human Cancer section describes RALA’s role in tumor transformation. Our copy does not establish a range of pathological roles for REPS1, so it supports only part of the claim about all three proteins. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ral and Rab GTPases cycle between GDP-bound inactive and GTP-bound active states.

    “Similar to other small GTPases, Ral and Rab cycle between a guanosine diphosphate (GDP)–bound inactive state and a GTP-bound active state (10–12).”

    From Regulation of cargo exocytosis by a Reps1-Ralbp1-RalA module (2023) · cites this paper as [10]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Oxford G, Owens CR, Titus BJ, Foreman TL, Herlevsen MC, Smith SC, and Theodorescu D (2005) RalA and RalB: antagonistic relatives in cancer cell migration. Cancer Res 65:7111-7120.
  2. Smith SC, Oxford G, Baras AS, Owens C, Havaleshko D, Brautigan DL, Safo MK, and Theodorescu D (2007) Expression of ral GTPases, their effectors, and activa- tors in human bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13:3803-3813.
  3. Wang K, Terai K, Peng W, Rouyanian A, Liu J, Roby KF, Wise AL, Ezzeldin M, Larson J, Woo RA, et al. (2013) The role of RalA in biology and therapy of ovarian cancer. Oncotarget DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.1435.: · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, C., & Theodorescu, D.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Pharmacological Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
1-11
ISSN
0031-6997 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2773731465
Cited by
119
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacological Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CA075115)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA 075115, R01CA075115, R29CA075115)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Keywords
Ral GTPase, Ras superfamily, RAS mutations, cancer therapeutics, RAF/ERK pathway, PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, metastasis
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Enzyme Inhibitors, Humans, Models, Molecular, Neoplasms, Structure-Activity Relationship, ral GTP-Binding Proteins, Small Molecule Libraries, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review