Cited by 2,557Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions

Open access
Ostrem, Jonathan M., Peters, Ulf, Sos, Martin L., Wells, James A., Shokat, Kevan M.·2013·Nature

Abstract

Somatic mutations in the small GTPase K-Ras are the most common activating lesions found in human cancer, and are generally associated with poor response to standard therapies. Efforts to target this oncogene directly have faced difficulties owing to its picomolar affinity for GTP/GDP and the absence of known allosteric regulatory sites. Oncogenic mutations result in functional activation of Ras family proteins by impairing GTP hydrolysis. With diminished regulation by GTPase activity, the nucleotide state of Ras becomes more dependent on relative nucleotide affinity and concentration. This gives GTP an advantage over GDP and increases the proportion of active GTP-bound Ras. Here we report the development of small molecules that irreversibly bind to a common oncogenic mutant, K-Ras(G12C). These compounds rely on the mutant cysteine for binding and therefore do not affect the wild-type protein. Crystallographic studies reveal the formation of a new pocket that is not apparent in previous structures of Ras, beneath the effector binding switch-II region. Binding of these inhibitors to K-Ras(G12C) disrupts both switch-I and switch-II, subverting the native nucleotide preference to favour GDP over GTP and impairing binding to Raf. Our data provide structure-based validation of a new allosteric regulatory site on Ras that is targetable in a mutant-specific manner.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature12796

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compounds bind covalently to cysteine 12 in the switch II pocket of GDP-bound KRASG12C, preventing oncogenic signaling and causing tumor regressions in preclinical models.

    “compounds have been identified that bind covalently to cysteine 12 within the switch II pocket of the GDP-bound form of the KRASG12C protein, preventing oncogenic signaling and causing potent tumor regressions in preclinical models.3-7”

    From Acquired Resistance to KRAS <sup>G12C</sup> Inhibition in Cancer (2021) · cites this paper as [3]

    The paper’s structural and cellular-results passages support covalent binding at cysteine 12 in the switch-II pocket of GDP-bound KRAS(G12C) and impaired signaling-related interactions. They do not support potent tumor regressions in preclinical models: the reported effects are in lung cancer cell lines, and the discussion says the compounds require further optimization before in vivo assessment. The relevant passages have no page numbers in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Discovery of the switch-II pocket enabled development of covalent KRAS G12C inhibitors such as sotorasib and adagrasib.

    “This paradigm changed following the discovery of the switch-II pocket, which enabled development of covalent KRAS G12C inhibitors such as sotorasib and adagrasib [5,6,7].”

    From Precision Targeting of KRAS-Mutant Cancers: Beyond G12C Toward G12D and Pan-RAS Therapeutic Strategies (2026) · cites this paper as [5]

    The paper’s Abstract describes identifying the switch-II pocket and using it to develop early irreversible, mutant-specific KRAS G12C inhibitors. It presents those findings as a starting point for future drug discovery, but our copy does not identify sotorasib or adagrasib or establish a specific link to their development. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Early iterations of this compound were selective for the GDP-bound state, effectively locking KRAS G12C in its inactive form.

    “Early iterations of this compound were selective for the GDP-bound state, effectively locking KRAS G12C in its inactive form (Figure 3) [47].”

    From KRAS: Biology, Inhibition, and Mechanisms of Inhibitor Resistance (2024) · cites this paper as [47]

    The paper reports preferential binding to GDP-bound K-Ras(G12C), irreversible inhibitor binding, and reduced GTP affinity. It says these effects should lead to accumulation in the inactive state; it does not establish that the compounds lock all treated KRAS G12C in that state. The deciding passages are in the paper’s main text (indexed under Abstract; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Covalent inhibitors targeting mutated cysteine residues in KRASG12C exploited a binding pocket in the switch II domain which enabled the development of clinically active small molecule inhibitors for patients with this mutation.

    “However, covalent inhibitors targeting the mutated cysteine residues in KRAS G12C exploited a binding pocket in the switch II domain which enabled the development of clinically active small molecule inhibitors for patients with this mutation [3-5].”

    From Anti-tumor efficacy of a potent and selective non-covalent KRASG12D inhibitor (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

    The supplied passages (labelled Abstract; no page given) describe mutant-cysteine-targeting inhibitors that bind a switch-II pocket in K-Ras(G12C). They do not establish clinically active inhibitors for patients: the paper says its compounds still needed optimization before in vivo assessment and could serve as a starting point for drug discovery. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Direct small-molecule inhibitors of KRAS, including covalent inhibitors of KRASG12C, impair oncogenic signaling and cause tumor regressions in preclinical models.

    “Recent advances in medicinal chemistry have enabled the development of direct small-molecule inhibitors of KRAS, including covalent inhibitors of the KRASG12C protein that impair oncogenic signaling and cause tumor regressions in preclinical models (8–10).”

    From Mechanisms of Resistance to Oncogenic KRAS Inhibition in Pancreatic Cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [8]

    The paper reports irreversible, mutant-specific K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors that impair effector binding and reduce viability in G12C-mutant lung cancer cell lines (Abstract; page not provided). It does not report tumor regressions: the authors describe in vivo assessment as a future step. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ostrem, J. M., Peters, U., Sos, M. L., Wells, J. A., & Shokat, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Shokat, Kevan M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2013-11
Volume
503
Issue
7477
Pages
548-551
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2128339707
Cited by
2,557
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 290 · 2025: 284 · 2024: 319 · 2023: 264 · 2022: 282 · 2021: 231 · 2020: 185 · 2019: 128 · 2018: 121 · 2017: 119 · 2016: 133 · 2015: 109 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 2
FWCI
49.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM064337)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
allosteric inhibition, switch II, switch I, oncogenic Ras mutations, structure-based drug design, crystal structure
MeSH terms
Allosteric Regulation, Allosteric Site, Cysteine, Guanosine Diphosphate, Guanosine Triphosphate, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Models, Molecular, Genes, ras, Substrate Specificity, Oncogene Protein p21(ras), Apoptosis, Crystallography, X-Ray, Cell Line, Tumor, raf Kinases, Mutant Proteins, Static Electricity, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review