Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for host-dependent RNA editing in the transcriptome of SARS-CoV-2

Di Giorgio, Salvatore, Martignano, Filippo, Torcia, Maria Gabriella, Mattiuz, Giorgio, Conticello, Silvestro G.·2020·Science Advances

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Host deaminases shape the viral RNA genome and its evolution by targeting its RNA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.abb5813

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Database analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomic variations showed an overwhelmingly high C-to-U mutation rate, accounting for about 40% of all single nucleotide variations, which was interpreted as a result of RNA editing by host APOBECs rather than random mutations.

    “Interestingly, the database analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomic variations showed an overwhelmingly high C-to-U mutation rate, account for about 40% of all single nucleotide variations, which was interpreted as a result of RNA editing by host APOBECs rather than random mutations11,12,14,27.”

    From The roles of APOBEC-mediated RNA editing in SARS-CoV-2 mutations, replication and fitness (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and rubella vaccine virus genome data derived from patients show predominant mutational patterns with specific signatures rather than random genetic variations, suggesting that host-factor induced mutations play an important role in shaping the viral genomic RNA mutational outcome and evolution.

    “Recent analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and rubella vaccine virus genome data derived from patients show predominant mutational patterns with specific signatures rather than random genetic variations, suggesting that the host-factor induced mutations play an important role in shaping the viral genomic RNA mutational outcome and evolution11–14.”
  • Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 variants from the database showed higher AC motif mutations (38.3%) than UC motif mutations (31.2%).

    “Interestingly, analysis of SARS-CoV-2 variants from the database also showed higher AC motif mutations (38.3%) than UC motif mutations (31.2%) (Supplementary Fig. S4), as also reported in the previous bioinformatic database analysis3,11,27.”
  • Prior bioinformatic analyses suggested that some C-to-U mutations in SARS-CoV-2 sequences may be caused by APOBEC proteins rather than random mutations by viral RNA polymerase or ROS.

    “Prior bioinformatic analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 sequences suggested that some of the C-to-U mutations may be caused by APOBEC proteins instead of the random mutations caused by viral RNA polymerase during replication or ROS11,12,14,27,51,52.”
  • A high mutation rate of C in AC motif was noted in SARS-CoV-2 and Rubella Virus by prior bioinformatic analysis.

    “A high mutation rate of C in AC motif was also noted in SARS-CoV-2 and Rubella Virus by prior bioinformatic analysis3,11,27.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005687 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/s41576-018-0006-1 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.virol.2015.03.012 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.04.013 · DOI
  5. 10.1128/JVI.79.10.6291-6298.2005 · DOI
  6. 10.1128/JVI.00067-06 · DOI
  7. 10.1128/JVI.00238-08 · DOI
  8. 10.1186/1471-2156-10-75 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/nar/gkp604 · DOI
  10. 10.1089/jir.2009.0065 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/rmv.674 · DOI
  12. 10.1099/vir.0.028043-0 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.coi.2011.08.009 · DOI
  14. C. E. Samuel, ADARs: Viruses and innate immunity. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 353, 163–195 (2012).
  15. S. Tomaselli, F. Galeano, F. Locatelli, A. Gallo, ADARs and the balance game between virus infection and innate immune cell response. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 17, 37–51 (2015).
  16. 10.1186/s12862-019-1472-6 · DOI
  17. 10.1128/jvi.65.4.1779-1788.1991 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00423-9 · DOI
  19. 10.1099/vir.0.80973-0 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/hep.20580 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.1153201 · DOI
  22. 10.1128/JVI.00290-11 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.chom.2018.04.005 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.068 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/s41564-017-0063-9 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41598-018-24448-2 · DOI
  27. 10.1128/JVI.00632-10 · DOI
  28. 10.1128/JVI.00056-10 · DOI
  29. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008080 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1080/22221751.2020.1725399 · DOI
  31. Z. Shen, Y. Xiao, L. Kang, W. Ma, L. Shi, L. Zhang, Z. Zhou, J. Yang, J. Zhong, D. Yang, L. Guo, G. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Xu, M. Chen, Z. Gao, J. Wang, L. Ren, M. Li, Genomic diversity of SARS-CoV-2 in coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. , ciaa203 (2020).
  32. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt287 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/s41596-019-0279-7 · DOI
  34. T. Flati S. Gioiosa N. Spallanzani I. Tagliaferri M. Angela Diroma G. Pesole G. Chillemi E. Picardi T. Castrignanò HPC-REDItools: A novel HPC-aware tool for improved large scale RNA-editing analysis. bioRxiv 2020.04.30.069732 [ Preprint ]. 30 April 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.30.069732. · DOI
  35. 10.1186/s12859-016-1432-8 · DOI
  36. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000896 · DOI
  37. 10.4161/rna.8.2.15013 · DOI
  38. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003565 · DOI
  39. 10.1101/gr.164749.113 · DOI
  40. 10.1101/gr.161265.113 · DOI
  41. 10.1021/bi001383g · DOI
  42. 10.1126/science.1170995 · DOI
  43. 10.1101/gr.124107.111 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/srep14941 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/nar/gkw767 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1038/nsmb.1975 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.3390/genes10010013 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/s41592-019-0610-9 · DOI
  49. 10.1261/rna.1581809 · DOI
  50. 10.1099/vir.0.045146-0 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/ncomms5726 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/emboj/cdg369 · DOI
  53. 10.1080/15476286.2016.1184387 · DOI
  54. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030063 · DOI
  55. 10.1093/jnci/djt018 · DOI
  56. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv566 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118 · DOI
  60. 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Di Giorgio, S., Martignano, F., Torcia, M. G., Mattiuz, G., & Conticello, S. G.
Affiliations
  • Core Research Laboratory, ISPRO, Firenze 50139, Italy.
  • Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Firenze 50139, Italy.
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2020-06-17
Volume
6
Issue
25
ISSN
2375-2548
Cited by
355
References
5
Language
en
Funders
  • Ministero della Salute (PE-2013-02357669)
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (IG-17701)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review