CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ameliorating the hallmarks of cellular senescence in skeletal muscle myogenic progenitors in vitro and in vivo

Shahini, Aref, Rajabian, Nika, Choudhury, Debanik, Shahini, Shahryar, Vydiam, Kalyan, Nguyen, Thy, Kulczyk, Joseph, Santarelli, Tyler, Ikhapoh, Izuagie, Zhang, Yali, Wang, Jianmin, Liu, Song, Stablewski, Aimee, Thiyagarajan, Ramkumar, Seldeen, Kenneth, Troen, Bruce R., Peirick, Jennifer, Lei, Pedro, Andreadis, Stelios T.·2021·Science Advances
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abe5671PMC PMC8442867
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The embryonic factor NANOG reverses aging hallmarks and rejuvenates senescent skeletal muscle progenitors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.abe5671

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NANOG alone has a pivotal role in ameliorating senescence hallmarks and inducing rejuvenation in myogenic progenitor cells both in vitro and in vivo.

    “Shahini et al. showed that NANOG alone has a pivotal role in ameliorating of senescence hallmarks and inducing rejuvenation in myogenic progenitor cells both in vitro and in vivo 61 .”

    From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [61]

  • Other transcription factors might represent a safer alternative to induce epigenetic rejuvenation.

    “further supporting the idea that other transcription factors might represent a safer alternative to induce epigenetic rejuvenation as also reported by other groups 61,118 .”

    From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [61]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. 10.1038/nm.3651 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.4161/epi.23366 · DOI
  4. 10.1242/jcs.067306 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.mad.2009.11.006 · DOI
  6. 10.1128/MCB.00659-16 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.mad.2004.07.010 · DOI
  8. 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4632 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.1127168 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312204 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00004 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/sj.cr.7310125 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41467-019-09041-z · DOI
  15. B. Münst, M. C. Thier, D. Winnemöller, M. Helfen, R. P. Thummer, F. Edenhofer, Nanog induces suppression of senescence through downregulation of p27KIP1 expression. J. Cell Sci. 129, 912–920 (2016). · DOI
  16. 10.1002/stem.2452 · DOI
  17. 10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0494 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.scr.2014.08.001 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/ncomms5226 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/srep10205 · DOI
  21. 10.4161/cc.25402 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.scr.2017.11.018 · DOI
  23. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0688 · DOI
  24. A. Montecucco, F. Zanetta, G. Biamonti, Molecular mechanisms of etoposide. EXCLI J. 14, 95–108 (2015).
  25. A. Sharma K. Singh A. Almasan in DNA Repair Protocols L. Bjergbæk Ed. (Humana Press 2012) pp. 613–626. · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00199.x · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.arr.2018.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1101/gad.519709 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1101/pdb.prot5571 · DOI
  30. 10.4161/auto.21028 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.026 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/emm.2016.81 · DOI
  33. 10.3233/JPD-160989 · DOI · Paper page
  34. M. R. Duchen A. Surin J. Jacobson in Methods in Enzymology (Academic Press 2003) vol. 361 pp. 353–389. · DOI
  35. 10.1107/S0907444911010201 · DOI
  36. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.003547 · DOI
  37. 10.1242/dmm.024711 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.scr.2018.05.017 · DOI
  39. 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2697-2699.2004 · DOI
  40. 10.4103/0972-124X.94603 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00066-0 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/BF00304637 · DOI
  43. 10.1083/jcb.139.1.129 · DOI
  44. 10.1186/s13395-015-0046-6 · DOI
  45. 10.1186/s13287-018-0978-y · DOI
  46. 10.1111/acel.12051 · DOI
  47. 10.1089/hum.1997.8.12-1429 · DOI
  48. 10.1083/jcb.201212110 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1016/S0531-5565(96)00155-6 · DOI · Paper page
  50. S. Dillinger, T. Straub, A. Németh, Nucleolus association of chromosomal domains is largely maintained in cellular senescence despite massive nuclear reorganisation. bioRxiv , 054908 (2016).
  51. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1016/j.biocel.2017.09.005 · DOI
  53. 10.1002/cbin.10915 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/s41598-018-30977-7 · DOI
  55. 10.1111/acel.12446 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.3390/cells9051297 · DOI
  58. 10.1002/mus.880150104 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/mt.2014.103 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77214-0 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.redox.2013.12.020 · DOI
  62. 10.12688/f1000research.15931.1 · DOI
  63. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120 · DOI
  64. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts356 · DOI
  65. 10.1093/nar/gkt214 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1007/978-1-4939-8831-0_14 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shahini, A., Rajabian, N., Choudhury, D., Shahini, S., Vydiam, K., Nguyen, T., Kulczyk, J., Santarelli, T., Ikhapoh, I., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Liu, S., Stablewski, A., Thiyagarajan, R., Seldeen, K., Troen, B. R., Peirick, J., Lei, P., & Andreadis, S. T.
Venue
Science Advances
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
2021-09-03
Volume
7
Issue
36
ISSN
2375-2548
DOI
10.1126/sciadv.abe5671
PMC
PMC8442867
Cited by
38
References
11
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review