Cited by 66Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Computational modeling of tau pathology spread reveals patterns of regional vulnerability and the impact of a genetic risk factor

Open access
Cornblath, Eli J., Li, Howard L., Changolkar, Lakshmi, Zhang, Bin, Brown, Hannah J., Gathagan, Ronald J., Olufemi, Modupe F., Trojanowski, John Q. +3 more·2021·Science Advances

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Spread of tau pathology follows brain connectivity, is modulated by selective vulnerability, and is predicted by network analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.abg6677

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advances in image registration and analysis of serial sections improve capacity for complete unbiased assessment.

    “Advances in image registration and analysis of serial sections improve this capacity (Furth et al., 2018; Cornblath et al., 2021), but remain laborious and limited to a subset of anatomical levels.”

    From Spontaneous pathology in PS19 tauopathy mice progresses via brain networks (2025) · cites this paper as Cornblath et al., 2021

    The Results section, “Quantitative immunohistochemistry to evaluate pathological tau spread” (page unavailable), describes quantifying two sets of nearby sections to reduce selection bias. The Materials and Methods section, “Quantitative pathology” (page unavailable), describes digital analysis but also says annotations were modified by hand on sections selected at six anatomical levels. These passages support improved regional assessment through section analysis, but not an advance in image registration or a complete, unbiased assessment. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • By registering whole brain images of p-tau deposition in PS19 mice into the annotated Allen CCFv3, we identified seven regions which consistently exhibited pathology at 6mo and all later ages.

    “By registering whole brain images of p-tau deposition in PS19 mice into the annotated Allen CCFv3, similar to recent studies (Whitesell et al., 2019; Cornblath et al., 2021), we identified seven regions which consistently exhibited pathology at 6mo and all later ages.”

    From Spontaneous pathology in PS19 tauopathy mice progresses via brain networks (2025) · cites this paper as Cornblath et al., 2021

    The Results section says Cornblath et al. quantified phosphorylated tau pathology in brain regions annotated using the Allen CCF v3. The Methods section describes manually matching annotations to selected coronal sections, not registering whole-brain images into the atlas. The seven regions in PS19 mice are the citing authors’ own finding, not a finding attributed to Cornblath et al. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [53]W. H. R. Chan, M. Wildemeersch, T. Q. S. Quek, Characterization and control of diffusion processes in multi-agent networks. arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06738 [cs.SI] (27 August 2015). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cornblath, E. J., Li, H. L., Changolkar, L., Zhang, B., Brown, H. J., Gathagan, R. J., Olufemi, M. F., Trojanowski, J. Q., Bassett, D. S., Lee, V. M. Y., & Henderson, M. X.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Institute on Aging (US)
  • Santa Fe Institute (US)
  • Van Andel Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Henderson, Michael X.
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2021-06-11
Volume
7
Issue
24
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3172351936
Cited by
66
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (PHY-1554488, BCS-1631550)
  • National Institutes of Health (T32-AG000255, P30-AG10124, U19-AG062418, P50-NS053488, F30-MH118871, R01-NS099348)
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • Indian Statistical Institute (16879, P30-AG10124, U19-AG062418, P50-NS053488, F30 MH118871-01, PHY-1554488, BCS-1631550)
  • Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research (16879)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Paul G. Allen Family Foundation
  • ISI Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
tau pathology, Alzheimer's disease, tauopathy, neuropathological staging, regional vulnerability, connectome, diffusion modeling, LRRK2 mutations, gene expression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review