Buffering of genetic dominance by allele-specific protein complex assembly
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Protein complex assembly often occurs while subunits are being translated, resulting in complexes whose subunits were translated from the same mRNA in an allele-specific manner. It has thus been hypothesized that such cotranslational assembly may counter the assembly-mediated dominant-negative effect, whereby co-assembly of mutant and wild-type subunits “poisons” complex activity. Here, we show that cotranslationally assembling subunits are much less likely to be associated with autosomal dominant relative to recessive disorders, and that subunits with dominant-negative disease mutations are significantly depleted in cotranslational assembly compared to those associated with loss-of-function mutations. We also find that complexes with known dominant-negative effects tend to expose their interfaces late during translation, lessening the likelihood of cotranslational assembly. Finally, by combining complex properties with other features, we trained a computational model for predicting proteins likely to be associated with non–loss-of-function disease mechanisms, which we believe will be of considerable utility for protein variant interpretation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This effect is likely to be more common in highly abundant proteins, whose transcripts have high ribosome densities and are translated more efficiently than those of lowly abundant proteins (Riba et al., 2019; Schwanhäusser et al., 2011).”
BackgroundClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence
Landrum, M. J., Lee, J. M., Benson, M., Brown, G. R., Chao, C., Chitipiralla, S., Gu, B., Hart, J., Hoffman, D., Jang, W., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1153 · Cited by 4,196 · see citing works
A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications
Akdel, M., Pires, D. E. V., Pardo, E. P., Jänes, J., Zalevsky, A. O., Mészáros, B., Bryant, P., Good, L. L., Laskowski, R. A., Pozzati, G., et al. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00849-w · Cited by 675 · see citing works
A hydrophobic ratchet entrenches molecular complexes
Hochberg, G. K. A., Liu, Y., Marklund, E. G., Metzger, B. P. H., Laganowsky, A., & Thornton, J. W. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-3021-2 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Convergence of ion channel genome content in early animal evolution
Liebeskind, B. J., Hillis, D. M., & Zakon, H. H. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1501195112 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Cotranslational protein assembly imposes evolutionary constraints on homomeric proteins
Natan, E., Endoh, T., Haim-Vilmovsky, L., Flock, T., Chalancon, G., Hopper, J. T. S., Kintses, B., Horvath, P., Daruka, L., Fekete, G., et al. (2018) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-018-0029-5 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Badonyi, M., & Marsh, J. A. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63234-3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“[AR]-AD/AR mixed : the gene has at least one AD and one AR phenotype with a suf fi cient number of missense variants, and the phenotype is annotated as AR in HPO.”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Badonyi, M., & Marsh, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Marsh, Joseph A
- Venue
- Science Advances
- Published
- 2023-06-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- eadf9845-eadf9845
- ISSN
- 2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10413657
- OpenAlex
- W4378894919
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 3.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M010996/1)
- H2020 European Research Council (101001169)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Keywords
- genetic dominance, autosomal dominant disorder, recessive disorders, dominant negative mutation, loss-of-function mutations
- MeSH terms
- Alleles, Mutation, Proteins, RNA, Messenger
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review