Cited by 24Genomics and Rare DiseasesRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA Research and Splicing

Buffering of genetic dominance by allele-specific protein complex assembly

Open access
Badonyi, Mihaly, Marsh, Joseph A·2023·Science Advances

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protein complex assembly often occurs while subunits are being translated, resulting in complexes whose subunits were translated from the same mRNA in an allele-specific manner. It has thus been hypothesized that such cotranslational assembly may counter the assembly-mediated dominant-negative effect, whereby co-assembly of mutant and wild-type subunits “poisons” complex activity. Here, we show that cotranslationally assembling subunits are much less likely to be associated with autosomal dominant relative to recessive disorders, and that subunits with dominant-negative disease mutations are significantly depleted in cotranslational assembly compared to those associated with loss-of-function mutations. We also find that complexes with known dominant-negative effects tend to expose their interfaces late during translation, lessening the likelihood of cotranslational assembly. Finally, by combining complex properties with other features, we trained a computational model for predicting proteins likely to be associated with non–loss-of-function disease mechanisms, which we believe will be of considerable utility for protein variant interpretation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.adf9845

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Badonyi, M., & Marsh, J. A.
Affiliations
Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB)
Corresponding author
Marsh, Joseph A
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2023-06-02
Volume
9
Issue
22
Pages
eadf9845-eadf9845
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378894919
Cited by
24
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M010996/1)
  • H2020 European Research Council (101001169)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
genetic dominance, autosomal dominant disorder, recessive disorders, dominant negative mutation, loss-of-function mutations
MeSH terms
Alleles, Mutation, Proteins, RNA, Messenger

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review