Cited by 40Autophagy in Disease and TherapyUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysCellular transport and secretion

Three-step docking by WIPI2, ATG16L1, and ATG3 delivers LC3 to the phagophore

Open access
Rao, Shanlin, Skulsuppaisarn, Marvin, Strong, Lisa M., Ren, Xuefeng, Lazarou, Michael, Hurley, James H., Hummer, Gerhard·2024·Science Advances

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The covalent attachment of ubiquitin-like LC3 proteins (microtubule-associated proteins 1A/1B light chain 3) prepares the autophagic membrane for cargo recruitment. We resolve key steps in LC3 lipidation by combining molecular dynamics simulations and experiments in vitro and in cellulo. We show how the E3-like ligaseautophagy-related 12 (ATG12)–ATG5-ATG16L1 in complex with the E2-like conjugase ATG3 docks LC3 onto the membrane in three steps by (i) the phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate effector protein WD repeat domain phosphoinositide-interacting protein 2 (WIPI2), (ii) helix α2 of ATG16L1, and (iii) a membrane-interacting surface of ATG3. Phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) lipids concentrate in a region around the thioester bond between ATG3 and LC3, highlighting residues with a possible role in the catalytic transfer of LC3 to PE, including two conserved histidines. In a near-complete pathway from the initial membrane recruitment to the LC3 lipidation reaction, the three-step targeting of the ATG12–ATG5-ATG16L1 machinery establishes a high level of regulatory control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.adj8027

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Rao, S., Skulsuppaisarn, M., Strong, L. M., Ren, X., Lazarou, M., Hurley, J. H., & Hummer, G.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute of Biophysics (DE)
  • QB3 (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Hurley, James H.
  • Hummer, Gerhard
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2024-02-09
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
eadj8027-eadj8027
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391629214
Cited by
40
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
FWCI
11.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research (ASAP-000350)
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
LC3 lipidation, autophagy, WIPI2, ATG16L1, ATG3, phagophore, phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate, phosphatidylethanolamine, thioester bond, histidine catalytic residue
MeSH terms
Autophagosomes, Autophagy-Related Proteins, Autophagy, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Phagocytosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review