Cited by 561Protist diversity and phylogenyPlant Diversity and EvolutionPlant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies

The Closest Living Relatives of Land Plants

Karol, Kenneth G., McCourt, Richard M., Cimino, Matthew T., Delwiche, Charles F.·2001·Science

Abstract

The embryophytes (land plants) have long been thought to be related to the green algal group Charophyta, though the nature of this relationship and the origin of the land plants have remained unresolved. A four-gene phylogenetic analysis was conducted to investigate these relationships. This analysis supports the hypothesis that the land plants are placed phylogenetically within the Charophyta, identifies the Charales (stoneworts) as the closest living relatives of plants, and shows the Coleochaetales as sister to this Charales/land plant assemblage. The results also support the unicellular flagellate Mesostigma as the earliest branch of the charophyte lineage. These findings provide insight into the nature of the ancestor of plants, and have broad implications for understanding the transition from aquatic green algae to terrestrial plants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1065156

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karol, K. G., McCourt, R. M., Cimino, M. T., & Delwiche, C. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Department of Botany, Academy of Natural Sciences, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA.
Corresponding author
Karol, Kenneth G.
Venue
Science
Published
2001-12-14
Volume
294
Issue
5550
Pages
2351-2353
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2043114724
Cited by
561
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 33
FWCI
10.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies
Keywords
land plant origin, land plants, charophytes, Charales, green algae, plant evolution, phylogenetic relationships
MeSH terms
Chlorophyta, Bayes Theorem, Biological Evolution, Phylogeny, Plant Proteins, Plants, Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase, Likelihood Functions, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Genes, Plant, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Plant Physiological Phenomena, DNA, Plant, Genes, rRNA, Mitochondrial Proteins, ATP Synthetase Complexes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review