The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex Ratio Variation in Mammals
Abstract
Parents will increase their fitness by varying the sex ratio of their progeny in response to differences in the costs and benefits of producing sons and daughters. Sex differences in energy requirements or viability during early growth, differences in the relative fitness of male and female offspring, and competition or cooperation between siblings or between siblings and parents might all be expected to affect the sex ratio. Although few trends have yet been shown to be consistent, growing numbers of studies have demonstrated significant variation in birth sex ratios in non-human mammals. These are commonly cited as evidence of adaptive manipulation of the sex ratio. However, several different mechanisms may affect the birth sex ratio, and not all of them are likely to be adaptive. Valid evidence that sex ratio trends are adaptive must be based either on the overall distribution of those trends or on cases in which the sex ratio can be shown to vary with the relative fitness of producing sons and daughters. The distribution of observed sex ratio trends does not conform closely to the predictions of any single adaptive theory. Some recent studies, however, indicate that, within species, the sex ratio varies with the costs or benefits of producing male or female offspring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
The response of the sexes to nutritional stress
Widdowson, E. M. (1976) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns19760030 · Cited by 115
Cited by
Constraints in the Evolution of Sex Ratio Adjustment
West, S. A., & Sheldon, B. C. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069043 · Cited by 481
Population density affects sex ratio variation in red deer
Kruuk, L. E. B., Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. D., Pemberton, J. M., & Guinness, F. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/20917 · Cited by 388
Self-citationSociosexuality and Romantic Partner Choice
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1992) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00264.x · Cited by 371
The social and reproductive biology of Humpback Whales: an ecological perspective
CLAPHAM, P. J. (1996) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.1996.tb00145.x · Cited by 286
Mysterud, A., Stenseth, N. C., Yoccoz, N. G., Ottersen, G., & Langvatn, R. (2003) · Geophysical Monograph Series · doi:10.1029/134gm11 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Iason, G. R.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Review of Biology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1986-09
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 339-374
- ISSN
- 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-7718
- OpenAlex
- W2026939264
- Cited by
- 625
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex Ratio Variation in Mammals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/415033
- The paper
- Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Iason, G. R. (1986). Sex Ratio Variation in Mammals. The Quarterly Review of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1086/415033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.