Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Precision Cosmology? Not Just Yet . . .

Open access
Bridle, Sarah L., Lahav, Ofer, Ostriker, Jeremiah P., Steinhardt, Paul J.·2003·Science

Abstract

The recent announcement from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite experiment combined with other recent advances in observational cosmology verifies key components of the standard cosmological model. However, we argue that there remain some significant open issues regarding the basic history and composition of the Universe and uncertainties in some of the most important parameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1082158

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Metadata

Authors
Bridle, S. L., Lahav, O., Ostriker, J. P., & Steinhardt, P. J.
Venue
Science
Published
2003-03-07
Volume
299
Issue
5612
Pages
1532-1533
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2130384052
Cited by
234
References
5
FWCI
13.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Precision Cosmology? Not Just Yet . . . https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1082158
The paper
Bridle, S. L., Lahav, O., Ostriker, J. P., & Steinhardt, P. J. (2003). Precision Cosmology? Not Just Yet . . . Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082158

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.