The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generating Diverse Skeletons of Small Molecules Combinatorially
Abstract
Lack of efficient access to collections of synthetic compounds that have skeletal diversity is a key bottleneck in the small-molecule discovery process. We report a synthesis strategy that involves transforming substrates with different appendages that pre-encode skeletal information, named σ elements, into products that have different skeletons with the use of common reaction conditions. With this approach, split-pool synthesis can be used to pre-encode skeletal diversity combinatorially and thereby generate such small molecules very efficiently. A split-pool synthesis of more than 1000 compounds produced overlapping, combinatorial matrices of molecular skeletons and appended building blocks in both enantiomeric and diastereomeric forms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of natural product chemistry in drug discovery
Butler, M. S. (2004) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np040106y · Cited by 1,381
Natural Products as a Foundation for Drug Discovery
Beutler, J. A. (2009) · Current Protocols in Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/0471141755.ph0911s46 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Burke, M. D., Berger, E. M., & Schreiber, S. L.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2003-10-24
- Volume
- 302
- Issue
- 5645
- Pages
- 613-618
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2061355448
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generating Diverse Skeletons of Small Molecules Combinatorially. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1089946
- The paper
- Burke, M. D., Berger, E. M., & Schreiber, S. L. (2003). Generating Diverse Skeletons of Small Molecules Combinatorially. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089946
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.