Structure-Based Assembly of Protein Complexes in Yeast
Open accessAbstract
Images of entire cells are preceding atomic structures of the separate molecular machines that they contain. The resulting gap in knowledge can be partly bridged by protein-protein interactions, bioinformatics, and electron microscopy. Here we use interactions of known three-dimensional structure to model a large set of yeast complexes, which we also screen by electron microscopy. For 54 of 102 complexes, we obtain at least partial models of interacting subunits. For 29, including the exosome, the chaperonin containing TCP-1, a 3′-messenger RNA degradation complex, and RNA polymerase II, the process suggests atomic details not easily seen by homology, involving the combination of two or more known structures. We also consider interactions between complexes (cross-talk) and use these to construct a structure-based network of molecular machines in the cell.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Template-based methods for predicting protein complex structures utilize experimentally resolved multimeric structures.
“A second class of approaches is template-based methods, which utilize experimentally resolved multimeric structures12–16.”
From AF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 383
- Authors
- Aloy, P., Böttcher, B., Ceulemans, H., Leutwein, C., Mellwig, C., Fischer, S., Gavin, A.-C., Bork, P., Superti-Furga, G., Serrano, L., & Russell, R. B.
- Affiliations
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Programme, 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Corresponding author
- Russell, Robert B.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2004-03-26
- Volume
- 303
- Issue
- 5666
- Pages
- 2026-2029
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2100371004
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 12.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- protein complex formation, structure-based modeling, protein-protein interaction, yeast, molecular machines, exosomes, RNA polymerase II, electron microscopy, protein complexes
- MeSH terms
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Microscopy, Electron, Models, Biological, Models, Molecular, Nuclear Proteins, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, RNA Polymerase II, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription Factors, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Chaperonins, Computational Biology, Protein Interaction Mapping, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Ribonuclease P
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review