AF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning
Open accessAbstract
Accurate descriptions of protein-protein interactions are essential for understanding biological systems. Remarkably accurate atomic structures have been recently computed for individual proteins by AlphaFold2 (AF2). Here, we demonstrate that the same neural network models from AF2 developed for single protein sequences can be adapted to predict the structures of multimeric protein complexes without retraining. In contrast to common approaches, our method, AF2Complex, does not require paired multiple sequence alignments. It achieves higher accuracy than some complex protein-protein docking strategies and provides a significant improvement over AF-Multimer, a development of AlphaFold for multimeric proteins. Moreover, we introduce metrics for predicting direct protein-protein interactions between arbitrary protein pairs and validate AF2Complex on some challenging benchmark sets and the E. coli proteome. Lastly, using the cytochrome c biogenesis system I as an example, we present high-confidence models of three sought-after assemblies formed by eight members of this system.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
AF2Complex adapts AlphaFold2 deep learning models, without retraining and without paired multiple sequence alignments, to predict multimeric protein complex structures and direct protein-protein interactions. It outperforms docking-centric approaches and improves on AF-Multimer on several benchmarks, and it produces high-confidence models for E. coli cytochrome c biogenesis system I assemblies.
Key findings
- On the CP17 heterodimer benchmark, AF2Complex top models were acceptable or better in 15 of 17 cases (88%) and medium/high quality in 13 of 17 (76%), with mean DockQ 0.62 versus 0.25 for a docking-centric approach; using AF-Multimer DL models raised the mean to 0.74, and combining monomer and multimer runs gave acceptable or better models for all 17 targets.
- On 440 heterodimers from the larger Dimer1193 set, AF2Complex performed better than AF-Multimer (median/mean DockQ 0.69/0.56 versus 0.65/0.55, p = 5 × 10−3, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), improving to 0.70/0.57 when top monomer and multimer runs were combined (p = 6 × 10−4); homodimer performance was comparable.
- For identifying true interacting pairs among all 561 pairwise combinations of the 34 CP17 sequences, interface-score and piTM achieved AUC0.1 values of 0.72 and 0.69, versus 0.49 for pTM and 0.10 for pLDDT, with random guessing at 0.05; precision-recall reached ~45% recall at ~90% precision.
- In the E. coli proteome test using 701 positive and 6,849 negative pairs, AUC0.1 was 0.60 when each monomer appeared only once (C = 1), dropping to 0.50 at C = 3, 0.40 at C = 5, and 0.22 for the full set; among confident predictions (interface-score > 0.45), about 40% had not been experimentally characterized. High-confidence Ccm models had interface scores of 0.82 for A2B2CDE, 0.56 for EFH, and ~0.72 for FGH.
Methods
- AF2Complex reuses the AF2 data pipeline, assembles complex MSAs by padding individual monomer MSAs with gaps, and increases the residue_index feature by 200 × (p − 1) to distinguish chains; it uses unpaired MSAs and AF2 monomer DL models (v2.0.1) or AF-Multimer DL models (v2.1.1), with up to 20 recycles.
- Benchmarks included CASP14 multimeric targets, the CP17 heterodimer set, curated Dimer1193/Oligomer562 sets from the PDB, and E. coli K12 proteome sets of 701 positive and 6,849 randomly selected negative pairs; Ccm system models were built for about two dozen component combinations, with heme placement via Rosetta.
- Main analyses used interface-score and piTM for complex confidence, DockQ/TM-score/IS-score for structural accuracy, ROC and precision-recall curves with AUC0.1, and paired one-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
Limitations
- The paper states that AF2 does not directly incorporate cofactors or prosthetic groups, so heme molecules were modeled separately with Rosetta; it also notes that the biological context of a hypothetical complex is often unavailable a priori, post-translational modifications such as CcmH signal peptide cleavage are not modeled, and computational limits restricted targets to <3000 residues for CASP14 and <1480 residues for E. coli/benchmark runs.
- The paper states that reliable statistical analysis of CASP14 assembly predictions was impossible because many experimental structures were unreleased, and that automated mapping of chains for high-order oligomers remains an open issue.
- Evident from the text: performance depends on MSA depth, as the two CP17 failures each had a monomer with only single-digit MSA depth; the E. coli “gold standard” set likely contains indirect interactions within large assemblies, lowering accuracy as C increases, and the GroL example shows that missing assembly context can prevent confident modeling.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 60 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
AF2Complex achieves higher accuracy than some complex protein-protein docking strategies.
“It achieves higher accuracy than some complex protein-protein docking strategies”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
AF2Complex provides a significant improvement over AF-Multimer, a development of AlphaFold for multimeric proteins.
“provides a significant improvement over AF-Multimer, a development of AlphaFold for multimeric proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
AF2Complex adapts the same neural network models from AF2 developed for single protein sequences to predict the structures of multimeric protein complexes without retraining.
“Here, we demonstrate that the same neural network models from AF2 developed for single protein sequences can be adapted to predict the structures of multimeric protein complexes without retraining.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
AF2Complex produces high-confidence models of three sought-after assemblies formed by eight members of cytochrome c biogenesis system I.
“using the cytochrome c biogenesis system I as an example, we present high-confidence models of three sought-after assemblies formed by eight members of this system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
AF2Complex does not require paired multiple sequence alignments.
“In contrast to common approaches, our method, AF2Complex, does not require paired multiple sequence alignments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Although tests are primarily on dimers, AF2Complex can be applied to higher-order oligomers.
“Although our tests are primarily conducted on dimers, the method, AF2Complex, can be applied to higher-order oligomers, and we show examples of such.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Using multiple test sets and without paired sequence alignments, AF2 can be adapted to predict both the presence of protein-protein interactions and the corresponding quaternary structures.
“using multiple test sets and without using paired sequence alignments, we demonstrate that AF2 can be adapted to predict both the presence of protein-protein interactions and the corresponding quaternary structures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the 12-membered ring of H1060, AF2Complex's model forms an ellipse instead of the expected circular structure.
“The most challenging one is the 12-membered ring, for which our model forms an ellipse instead of the expected circular structure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The improvement of the other docking-centric strategy still falls behind AF2Complex on the same CP17 set.
“Nevertheless, the improvement still falls behind AF2Complex on the same set (Fig. 3b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When AF2Complex was applied to a previously defined gold standard interaction set in E. coli, it found that many protein pairs are likely due to associations in large assemblies that are not necessarily in direct physical contact.
“When AF2Complex was applied to a previously defined “gold standard” interaction set in E. coli32, it found that many protein pairs are likely due to associations in large assemblies that are not necessarily in direct physical contact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Hu, P. et al. Global Functional Atlas of Escherichia coli Encompassing Previously Uncharacterized Proteins. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000096 (2009). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
AF2Complex's top model for CASP14 target H1072 achieved a TM-score of 0.90 when superimposed onto the experimental structure.
“the top model by AF2Complex achieved a remarkable TM-score39 of 0.90 when superimposed onto the experimental structure (Fig. 2a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Zhang, Y. & Skolnick, J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform 57, 702–710 (2004). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
AF2Complex generates a highly confident model for H1097 with an interface score of 0.79.
“AF2Complex generates a highly confident model with an interface score of 0.79 (Fig. 2e).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
AF2Complex returns models of four ring-like substructures of H1060 at highly confident interface scores ranging from 0.56 to 0.83.
“AF2Complex returns models of these four rings at highly confident interface scores ranging from 0.56 to 0.83 (Fig. 2d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The interface similarity score (IS-score) for H1065 has a high value at 0.6020.
“The interface similarity score (IS-score), which was designed to evaluate dimeric protein-protein interfaces40, has a high value at 0.6020.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Gao, M. & Skolnick, J. New benchmark metrics for protein-protein docking methods. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform 79, 1623–1634 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
AF2Complex generated a highly accurate complex model for H1065 with a TM-score of 0.94.
“AF2Complex generated a highly accurate complex model with a TM-score of 0.94 (Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
AF2Complex and AF-Multimer performance on the homodimer set is comparable.
“whereas their performance on the homodimer set is comparable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In one of the two cases when AF2Complex failed on CP17, the combined strategy resulted in a high-quality model.
“However, in one of the two cases when AF2Complex failed, the combined strategy resulted in a high-quality model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
AF-Multimer (version 2.1.1) may yield unphysical models with severe clashes for a complex, especially for large oligomeric targets, including homo-oligomers.
“AF-Multimer (version 2.1.1) may yield unphysical models with severe clashes for a complex, especially for large oligomeric targets, including homo-oligomers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using AF2 monomer DL models, AF2Complex performs quite close to AF-Multimer on the CP17 set, with a mean DockQ score of 0.62 versus 0.65.
“using AF2 monomer DL models, AF2Complex performs quite close to AF-Multimer35 on the CP17 set (Fig. 3c), with a mean DockQ score of 0.62 versus 0.65.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Evans, R. et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv, 2021.2010.2004.463034 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
AF2Complex further improves to median/mean 0.70/0.57 on the heterodimers, p=6e-4, if the overall top-ranked model of both monomer and multimer DL runs are assessed.
“AF2Complex further improves (median/mean 0.70/0.57 on the heterodimers, p-value = 6 × 10−4, same Wilcoxon test as above) if the overall top-ranked model of both monomer and multimer DL runs are assessed for the heterodimers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Both interface-score and piTM demonstrate a clear advantage over pTM-score and pLDDT-score for predicting protein-protein interactions.
“Overall, both the interface-score and the piTM-score demonstrate a clear advantage over the other two metrics, the pTM-score and pLDDT-score of AF21.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All protein pairs other than the CP17 pairs are non-interacting.
- Rests on an assumption: Most pairs of proteins are non-interacting.
- Findingown data
By combining the overall best model from AF2Complex runs using either monomer and multimer DL models of AF, acceptable or better models are obtained for all 17 CP17 targets.
“By combining the overall best model from AF2Complex runs using either monomer and multimer DL models of AF, we obtain acceptable or better models for all 17 targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When considering proteins that appear only once (C=1), the result largely recapitulates the benchmark above, with a slightly lower AUC0.1 of 0.60.
“When we considered proteins that appear only once (i.e., C = 1), we obtained a result that largely recapitulates the benchmark performed above, with a slightly lower AUC0.1 of 0.60.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The ROC curve displays a clear trend in which higher C values correspond to lower true positive rate or recall.
“The ROC curve displays a clear trend in which higher C values correspond to lower true positive rate or recall.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of the positive set, among predicted models with confident scores (interface-score > 0.45), about 40% of these predictions have not been experimentally characterized.
“Of the positive set, among the predicted models with confident scores (interface-score > 0.45), about 40% of these predictions have not been experimentally characterized (defined if both monomers share >70% sequence identity with sequences found in the same PDB entry).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When GroL was modeled alone with another putative partner, only models with low confidence scores were found.
“when GroL was modeled alone with another putative partner, we only found models with low confidence scores.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: GroL is part of a large assembly that requires seven GroL copies forming a ring stacked with another heptameric GroE ring.
- Findingown data
Two different conformational states were identified in the top two highest-ranking models of A2B2CDE.
“we identified two different conformational states in the top two highest-ranking models of A2B2CDE (Fig. 6b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In one A2B2CDE model, extensive interactions are present between CcmCD and CcmE, where CcmE extends its heme-binding loop with His130 and Tyr134 to reach the heme-binding site in CcmC that includes His60, His184, and Tyr17 of CcmD.
“Extensive interactions are present between CcmCD and CcmE in one model (Fig. 6b left panel), where the heme chaperone CcmE extends its heme-binding loop, characterized by two conserved residues His130CcmE and Tyr134CcmE, to reach the heme-binding site (HBS) in CcmC that includes His60CcmC and His184CcmC, and another conserved residue, Tyr17 of CcmD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Extensive contacts are present in the model with CcmC tightly bound with CcmE.
“Extensive contacts are present in the model with CcmC tightly bound with CcmE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
AF2Complex obtained a confident model in which CcmE is in complex with CcmF and CcmH.
“We obtained a confident model in which CcmE is in complex with CcmF and CcmH (Fig. 7a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The CcmBC protein-protein interfaces display larger changes between the two models than the other interfaces (IS-score 0.65 versus scores >0.84).
“the CcmBC protein-protein interfaces display larger changes between the two models than the other interfaces (similarity score, IS-score, of 0.65 versus scores >0.84).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The role of His60CcmC and His184CcmC, predicted heme iron-coordinating residues, is confirmed.
“The role of His60CcmC and His184CcmC, predicted heme iron-coordinating residues, is confirmed as well (Fig. 6e).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The disengagement of CcmE leads to conformational changes within CcmA2B2CD.
“The disengagement of CcmE leads to conformational changes within CcmA2B2CD (Fig. 6b center panel).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The number of residue-residue contacts between CcmB and CcmC drops by 45% between the two models.
“the number of residue-residue contacts between CcmB and CcmC drops by 45%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Similar interacting poses between CcmE and CcmF were obtained in models generated in the absence of CcmH.
“Similar interacting poses between CcmE and CcmF were obtained in models generated in the absence of CcmH.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The distance between His130CcmE and His303CcmF is ~6 Å.
“The distance between His130CcmE and His303CcmF is ~6 Å (Fig. 7a inset).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The RMSD of the CcmC backbone is ~1 Å.
“The root mean square deviation (RMSD) of the CcmC backbone is ~1 Å.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The interactions involve Trp114 and Trp119 of a tryptophan-rich loop (WWD domain), sitting at one edge of the binding pocket of the heme.
“The interactions involve Trp114 and Trp119 of a tryptophan-rich loop (WWD domain48), sitting at one edge of the binding pocket of the heme (Fig. 6c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Richard-Fogal, C. & Kranz, R. G. The CcmC:heme:CcmE complex in heme trafficking and cytochrome c biosynthesis. J. Mol. Biol. 401, 350–362 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Without using the TtCcmF structure as a template, the predicted CcmF model has a TM-score of 0.92 compared to the experimental structure.
“Without using this structure as a template, our predicted CcmF model has a TM-score of 0.92 compared to the experimental structure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
His130CcmE is only ~4 Å away from the 3-vinyl of heme, which is the proposed site of covalent attachment to His130CcmE to complete the heme delivery to CcmF.
“His130CcmE is only ~4 Å away from the 3-vinyl of heme (IUPAC numbering), which is the proposed site of covalent attachment to His130CcmE to complete the heme delivery to CcmF.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
This configuration leaves an opening for CcmG, now sitting at the site previously occupied by the CcmH N-terminal domain.
“This configuration leaves an opening for CcmG, another thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase (like CcmH), now sitting at the site previously occupied by the CcmH N-terminal domain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
High-quality complex prediction can be achieved without using paired MSAs as input.
“Importantly, we have shown in multiple benchmark tests that high-quality complex prediction can be achieved without using paired MSAs as input”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
One of the Cys residues of apocyt is found within 4 Å from Cys46 of CcmH.
“One of the Cys residues of apocyt is found within 4 Å from Cys46 of CcmH.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Physical contact between Cys46 of CcmH and an apocyt cysteine is present in some models.
“Physical contact between Cys46CcmH and an apocyt cysteine is present in some models (Fig. 8c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
High-confidence models were obtained for these assemblies that include multiple conformational states involving transient interactions with the heme chaperone and apocytochrome c peptides.
“Remarkably, high-confidence models were obtained for these assemblies that include multiple conformational states involving transient interactions with the heme chaperone and apocytochrome c peptides.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The cysteines of the apocyt are still ~16 Å away from the 8-vinyl group of the P-heme in the heme-bound model.
“the cysteines of the apocyt are still ~16 Å away from the 8-vinyl group of the P-heme.”
- Also stated in: § CcmFGH · plain
“The distance between the other Cys residue of apocyt and the 8-vinyl group of the heme is about 16 Å.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § CcmFGH · plain
- Findingown data
Only one of the two expected tryptophans (W229 and W236) from the WWD domain is in contact with the P-heme in the heme-bound model.
“only one of the two expected tryptophans (W229 and W236) from the WWD domain is in contact with the P-heme in the heme-bound model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
AF2 can be adapted to predict the structure of protein complexes at much higher accuracy than classical docking approaches, even if the docking approaches use monomeric structures predicted by AF2.
“Our findings clearly demonstrate that AF2 can be adapted to predict the structure of protein complexes at much higher accuracy than classical docking approaches, even if the docking approaches use monomeric structures predicted by AF2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The CcmFGH complex is arranged such that a reaction groove is formed in which an apocyt c can be sequentially passed among the CXXC motifs of CcmG (Cys80 and Cys83) and CcmH (Cys43 and Cys46) to reach the HBS of CcmE.
“the CcmFGH complex is arranged such that a reaction groove is formed in which an apocyt c can be sequentially passed among the CXXC motifs of CcmG (Cys80 and Cys83) and CcmH (Cys43 and Cys46) to reach the HBS of CcmE (Fig. 8a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The interface-score or piTM metric can be applied to effectively predict interacting pairs.
“We demonstrate that the interface-score or piTM metric can be applied to effectively predict interacting pairs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
AF2Complex can generate highly confident models that depict the complexes involved in the loading, release, and delivery of a heme-chaperone, including a reaction groove responsible for the final attachment of a heme to an apo-cytochrome protein.
“By way of example, AF2Complex can generate highly confident models that depict the complexes involved in the loading, release, and delivery of a heme-chaperone, including a reaction groove responsible for the final attachment of a heme to an apo-cytochrome protein.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In all top models of CcmFGH with 11 different apocyt peptides, the apocyts are invariably located in the predicted reaction groove formed by the three Ccm proteins.
“Remarkably, in all top models, the apocyts are invariably located in the predicted reaction groove (Fig. 8b).”
- Also stated in: § CcmFGH · plain
“All apocyts are found within the same groove formed by the three Ccm proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § CcmFGH · plain
- Findingown data
In all models of CcmFGH and models from separate modeling of a CcmGH complex, the CXXC motifs of CcmG and H are separated by ~15 Å.
“In all models of CcmFGH and also models from separate modeling of a CcmGH complex, the CXXC motifs of CcmG and H are separated by ~15 Å”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Both CcmH domains instead interact with a third protein, CcmE.
“In this case, both CcmH domains instead interact with a third protein, CcmE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Application of the AF-Multimer DL models with AF2Complex did not yield better models with higher confident scores than AF2 monomer DL models for the CcmI system.
“Application of the AF-Multimer DL models with AF2Complex did not yield better models with higher confident scores and are thus not presented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is very likely that neural network models trained for single-chain structure prediction have already learned the representations necessary to model protein complexes made of multiple single-chain proteins.
“Taken together, it is very likely that the neural network models trained for single-chain structure prediction have already learned the representations necessary to model protein complexes made of multiple single-chain proteins3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Skolnick, J., Gao, M., Zhou, H. & Singh, S. AlphaFold 2: Why It Works and Its Implications for Understanding the Relationships of Protein Sequence, Structure, and Function. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61, 4827–4831 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Intra-protein domain-domain interactions are not physically different from interprotein interactions.
- Premisecitation
The structural space of protein-protein interfaces is quite small.
“the structural space of protein-protein interfaces, the regions where direct physical contacts are found between protein partners forming a complex, is quite small6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Gao, M. & Skolnick, J. Structural space of protein-protein interfaces is degenerate, close to complete, and highly connected. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22517–22522 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Many proteins that form complexes in prokaryotes are fused into long, single-chain, multidomain proteins in eukaryotes.
“many proteins that form complexes in prokaryotes are fused into long, single-chain, multidomain proteins in eukaryotes4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Marcotte, E. M. et al. Detecting Protein Function and Protein-Protein Interactions from Genome Sequences. Science 285, 751–753 (1999). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Conventional approaches for predicting protein complex structures include a docking component, which is limited by force-field accuracy and completeness of conformational space sampling.
“conventional approaches for predicting the structure of protein complexes include a docking component8–11, which is limited by force-field accuracy and the completeness of conformational space sampling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [8] Vakser, I. A. Protein-protein docking: from interaction to interactome. Biophys. J. 107, 1785–1793 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Kozakov, D., Brenke, R., Comeau, S. R. & Vajda, S. PIPER: An FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform 65, 392–406 (2006). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Dominguez, C., Boelens, R. & Bonvin, A. HADDOCK: A protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 1731–1737 (2003). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Chen, R., Li, L. & Weng, Z. P. ZDOCK: An initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 52, 80–87 (2003). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The same physical forces that drive protein folding are also responsible for protein-protein associations.
“The same physical forces that drive protein folding are also responsible for protein-protein associations5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Keskin, Z., Gursoy, A., Ma, B. & Nussinov, R. Principles of protein-protein interactions: What are the preferred ways for proteins to interact? Chem. Rev. 108, 1225–1244 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Template-based computational approaches for identifying interacting partners are limited to detection of homologs.
“Computationally, template-based approaches have been used27, but they are limited to the detection of homologs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Gong, W. et al. Integrating multimeric threading with high-throughput experiments for structural interactome of Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 166944 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Generating paired MSAs requires identification of orthologous sequences across species, which is impractical in many cases because it is confounded by paralogs in eukaryotes, protein cross-talk in disease pathways, and pathogen-host interactions.
“Generating paired MSAs requires the identification of orthologous sequences across species, which is impractical in many cases because it is confounded by the presence of paralogs in eukaryotes, protein cross-talk in disease pathways, and pathogen-host interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Modifying the residue_index feature used by AF2 eliminates the need for a covalent linker that likely creates artifacts.
“A much better solution is to modify the “residue_index” feature used by AF2, which eliminates the need for a covalent linker that likely creates artifacts20,21.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [20] Mirdita, M., Ovchinnikov, S. & Steinegger, M. ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all. bioRxiv, 2021.2008.2015.456425 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Bryant, P., Pozzati, G. & Elofsson, A. Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2. bioRxiv, 2021.2009.2015.460468 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Paralogs may interact with different partners without using a conserved interaction mode.
“These paralogs may interact with different partners without using a conserved interaction mode.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Approaches combining docking with co-evolutionary signals or deep learning rely on paired multiple sequence alignments as inputs.
“These are powerful approaches, but they rely on paired multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) as inputs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Combining standard protein-protein docking methods with co-evolutionary signals or deep learning models has been carried out on full proteomes.
“Combining standard protein-protein docking methods with co-evolutionary signals28 or even with deep learning models29 has also been carried out on full proteomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [28] Cong, Q., Anishchenko, I., Ovchinnikov, S. & Baker, D. Protein interaction networks revealed by proteome coevolution. Science 365, 185–189 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Humphreys, I. R. et al. Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes. Science 374, eabm4805 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
No group participating in CASP14 provided a correct model of the H1072 complex.
“No group participating in the CASP14 competition provided a correct model of the complex36.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Ozden, B., Kryshtafovych, A. & Karaca, E. Assessment of the CASP14 assembly predictions. Proteins 89, 1787–1799 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The docking-centric approach has a mean DockQ score of 0.25 on CP17.
“a dramatic improvement from 0.25 of the docking-centric approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Ghani, U. et al. Improved docking of protein models by a combination of AlphaFold2 and ClusPro. bioRxiv, 2021.2009.2007.459290 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The fact that AF2Complex can produce a model without paired MSAs for H1097 strongly indicates that paired MSAs might not be essential.
“But the fact that AF2Complex can produce a model without paired MSAs in this case strongly indicates that paired MSAs might not be essential.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Another complex, docking-centric strategy increases the mean DockQ score from 0.25 to 0.47 on CP17.
“Another complex, docking-centric strategy increases the mean of DockQ score from 0.25 to 0.4722.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Ghani, U. et al. Improved docking of protein models by a combination of AlphaFold2 and ClusPro. bioRxiv, 2021.2009.2007.459290 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
By modeling the entire homo-oligomeric target complex, one may obtain a structural model with higher quality, especially for an intertwined oligomer.
“This example indicates that, by modeling the entire homo-oligomeric target complex, one may obtain a structural model with higher quality, especially for an intertwined oligomer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The docking-centric strategy of building a complex using ColabFold AF2, splitting monomers, and using ClusPro yields an acceptable or better top-ranked model for fewer than half of the CP17 targets.
“This strategy yields an acceptable or better top-ranked model for fewer than half of the targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Ghani, U. et al. Improved docking of protein models by a combination of AlphaFold2 and ClusPro. bioRxiv, 2021.2009.2007.459290 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
pLDDT is not ideal for evaluating protein complex models because it was designed for single domain evaluation.
“As expected, pLDDT is not ideal for evaluating protein complex models because it was designed for single domain evaluation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
AF2Complex can be used to predict protein-protein interactions.
“Overall, the results encouragingly conclude that AF2Complex can be used to predict protein-protein interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: All protein pairs other than the CP17 pairs are non-interacting.
- Rests on an assumption: Most pairs of proteins are non-interacting.
- Interpretationown data
A barrier to accurate modeling is the lack of the exact context of the protein-protein interaction.
“Further analysis also found a barrier to accurate modeling is the lack of the exact context of the protein-protein interaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Some pairs in the positive set do not interact directly, yielding low or even zero scores.
“This analysis suggests that some of the pairs in the positive set do not interact directly, yielding low or even zero scores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The best effort to date is a partial model of the CcmCDE complex generated using co-evolutionary analysis.
“To date, the best effort is a partial model of the CcmCDE complex generated using co-evolutionary analysis47.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Sutherland, M. C., Jarodsky, J. M., Ovchinnikov, S., Baker, D. & Kranz, R. G. Structurally Mapping Endogenous Heme in the CcmCDE Membrane Complex for Cytochrome c Biogenesis. J. Mol. Biol. 430, 1065–1080 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Despite the difficulty, the result suggests that AF2Complex performs as expected in a large-scale test.
“Despite this difficulty, the result suggests that AF2Complex performs as expected in a large-scale test.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
TM-heme was co-crystallized with CcmF from Thermus thermophilus (TtCcmF) in a recent published X-ray structure.
“TM-heme was co-crystallized with CcmF from Thermus thermophilus (TtCcmF) in a recent published X-ray structure49.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] Brausemann, A., Zhang, L., Ilcu, L. & Einsle, O. Architecture of the membrane-bound cytochrome c heme lyase CcmF. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 800–805 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Predicting all protein structures involved in a complex simultaneously by AF2Complex may overcome issues associated with rigid-body docking.
“One reason is that predicting all the protein structures involved in a complex simultaneously by AF2Complex may overcome issues associated with rigid-body docking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
More conformational changes are necessary for apocyt-heme attachment.
“more conformational changes are necessary for apocyt-heme attachment”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The reduced apocyt attacks one of Cys43 and Cys46 of CcmH to form a mixed disulfide.
“Next, the reduced apocyt attacks one of Cys43 and Cys46 of CcmH to form a mixed disulfide.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The intermediate complex then retrieves the heme acquired by CcmF.
“This intermediate complex then retrieves the heme acquired by CcmF”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The mixed disulfide is resolved by the second cysteine of CcmH.
“and subsequently the mixed disulfide is resolved by the second cysteine of CcmH.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
When applied to an E. coli proteome, some previously selected interacting pairs in the "gold standard" set are likely from large complex assemblies without direct interactions.
“When applied to an E. coli proteome, we were able to infer that some of the previously selected interacting pairs in the “gold standard” set are likely from large complex assemblies without direct interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
After entering the reaction groove, apocyt c is first reduced by Cys80 and Cys83 of CcmG.
“Of the previously proposed mechanisms46, our model supports the following: after entering the reaction groove, apocyt c is first reduced by Cys80 and Cys83 of CcmG.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Verissimo, A. F. et al. The thioreduction component CcmG confers efficiency and the heme ligation component CcmH ensures stereo-specificity during cytochrome c maturation. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 13154–13167 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The holo-cytochrome c is released.
“Finally, the holo-cytochrome c is released.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Our model of the CcmFGH complex provides structural insights into the mechanism of heme attachment to apocytochrome c.
“our model of the CcmFGH complex provides structural insights into the mechanism (Fig. 8a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The mapping of chains between model and experimental structure is an open issue for automated assessment of high-order oligomers, primarily due to the combinatorial growth of identical or homologous copies.
“Because the mapping of chains between model and experimental structure is an open issue for automated assessment of high-order oligomers, primarily due to the combinatorial growth of identical or homologous copies, we mainly focused on the dimer set in this study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The two CcmH domains are an exception to the notion that fused proteins directly interact.
“This is an exception to the notion that fused proteins directly interact4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Marcotte, E. M. et al. Detecting Protein Function and Protein-Protein Interactions from Genome Sequences. Science 285, 751–753 (1999). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The reduction of a mixed disulfide between the CXXC motifs of CcmG and H as proposed in an alternate mechanism is unlikely according to these models.
“and hence the reduction of a mixed disulfide between these two motifs as proposed in an alternate mechanism46 is unlikely according to these models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Verissimo, A. F. et al. The thioreduction component CcmG confers efficiency and the heme ligation component CcmH ensures stereo-specificity during cytochrome c maturation. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 13154–13167 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 41
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 39
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataUsing AF-Multimer DL models, AF2Complex obtained a single model with the expected C12 symmetry using unpaired MSAs but failed to build a physical model with paired MSAs.
“Using AF-Multimer DL models, we obtained a single model with the expected C12 symmetry using unpaired MSAs but failed to build a physical model with paired MSAs (Supplementary Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor T1070-D1, AF2Complex's top complex model yields a TM-score of 0.74, which is a significant improvement over 0.62 by AF2 in its official CASP14 assessment.
“our model for T1070-D1 yields a TM-score of 0.74, which is a significant improvement over 0.62 by AF2 in its official CASP14 assessment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAF2Complex's overall top models are acceptable or better in 15 of 17 (88%) CP17 cases, and 13 (76%) models are of medium or high quality according to DockQ, with a mean of 0.62.
“the overall top models from AF2Complex are acceptable or better in 15 of 17 (88%) cases, and 13 (76%) models are of medium or high quality according to the DockQ score42 (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Data 1), with a mean of 0.62”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Basu, S. & Wallner, B. DockQ: A quality measure for protein-protein docking models. PLoS One 11, e0161879 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAF2Complex mitigates the unphysical model issue with unpaired MSAs using the same multimer DL models and deals much more effectively with unpaired MSAs and the original monomer DL models of AF2.
“In contrast, AF2Complex mitigates this issue with unpaired MSAs using the same multimer DL models and deals much more effectively with unpaired MSAs and the original monomer DL models of AF2 (Supplementary Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataGroL is the most frequent monomer in the E. coli gold standard set, appearing in 79 pairs.
“the chaperonin protein GroL is the most frequent monomer in this set, appears in 79 pairs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown datapTM is much more discriminating than pLDDT but still much worse than interface-score or piTM.
“Although the pTM metric is much more discriminating than pLDDT, it is still much worse than interface-score or piTM in this regard.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe normalized AUC0.1 is 0.72 and 0.69 for interface-score and piTM, versus 0.49 and 0.10 for pTM and pLDDT.
“The normalized area under the curve (AUC) of this plot, AUC0.1, is 0.72 and 0.69 for interface-score and piTM, versus 0.49 and 0.10 for pTM and pLDDT, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: All protein pairs other than the CP17 pairs are non-interacting.
- Rests on an assumption: Most pairs of proteins are non-interacting.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe AUC0.1 drops to 0.50 at C=3, 0.40 at C=5, and 0.22 for the full set, likely due to inclusion of more non-direct interacting pairs as C increases.
“The AUC0.1 drops to 0.50 at C = 3, 0.40 at C = 5, and 0.22 for the full set, likely due to the inclusion of more non-direct interacting pairs as C increases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn 440 heterodimers, AF2Complex performs significantly better than AF-Multimer, with median/mean DockQ 0.69/0.56 versus 0.65/0.55, p=5e-3.
“On 440 heterodimers obtained using the same DL models, AF2Complex performs significantly better than AF-Multimer, albeit at smaller advantage (median/mean 0.69/0.56 versus 0.65/0.55, p value = 5 × 10−3, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, paired, one-tailed, n = 440, see Supplementary Text and Supplementary Fig. 2)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the precision-recall plot, ~45% recall was achieved at ~90% precision, and recall increases to ~70% at ~45% precision.
“The same trend is also displayed in the precision-recall plot, whereby we achieved ~45% recall (equivalent to the true positive rate) at ~90% precision, and the recall increases to ~70% at ~45% precision.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: All protein pairs other than the CP17 pairs are non-interacting.
- Rests on an assumption: Most pairs of proteins are non-interacting.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe mean score of AF2Complex increases to 0.74 using AF-Multimer DL models, due to unpaired MSAs, increased recycles and the interface-score metric.
“The mean score of AF2Complex increases to 0.74 using AF-Multimer DL models (Fig. 3d), thanks to unpaired MSAs, increased recycles and the interface-score metric (Supplementary Data 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe interface-score and piTM values are 0.55/0.59 and 0.45/0.50, respectively.
“Correspondingly, the interface-score and piTM values are 0.55/0.59 and 0.45/0.50, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: All protein pairs other than the CP17 pairs are non-interacting.
- Rests on an assumption: Most pairs of proteins are non-interacting.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the other A2B2CDE model, the heme-binding loop of CcmE is oriented away from the HBS of CcmCD, interactions between CcmC and E disappear, and the only remaining inter-protein residue-residue contacts are between a pair of transmembrane helices of CcmC and CcmE.
“The heme-binding loop of CcmE is oriented away from the HBS of CcmCD in the other model (Fig. 6b right panel), in which the interactions between CcmC and E disappear, and the only remaining inter-protein residue-residue contacts are between a pair of transmembrane helices of CcmC and CcmE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAF2Complex produced confident models of three assemblies, A2B2CDE, EFH, and FGH, the last one with and without apocyt peptides, all with high interface-score (0.82, 0.56, and ~0.72, respectively).
“we present the confident models of three assemblies, A2B2CDE, EFH, and FGH, the last one with and without apocyt peptides, all with high interface-score (0.82, 0.56, and ~0.72, respectively).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTwo E. coli targets with high-confidence models, CcmE/CcmF and CcmF/CcmH, caught attention.
“Two E. coli targets with high-confidence models, CcmE/CcmF and CcmF/CcmH, caught our attention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUsing CcmC as reference to superimpose the two complexes, movement is evident in CcmA2B2 but not in CcmD, which appears tightly coupled with CcmC.
“Using CcmC as the reference to superimpose the two complexes, movement is evident in CcmA2B2 but not in CcmD, which appears tightly coupled with CcmC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCcmE interacts with CcmF such that the HBS of CcmF faces the HBS of CcmE, which has a heme-handling motif like that in CcmC.
“CcmE interacts with CcmF such that the HBS of CcmF faces the HBS of CcmE, which has a heme-handling motif like that in CcmC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA pore is visible between transmembrane helices 2 and 5 of CcmC and exposes a heme molecule bound to CcmC.
“A pore is visible between transmembrane helices 2 and 5 of CcmC and exposes a heme molecule bound to CcmC (Fig. 6d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe heme-bound model displays the P-heme coordination role of His303CcmF and His173CcmF, and the TM-heme is coordinated by His261CcmF and His461CcmF.
“the heme-bound model displays the P-heme coordination role of His303CcmF and His173CcmF, and the TM-heme is coordinated by His261CcmF and His461CcmF (Fig. 7b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe CcmH N-terminal domain moves closer to the heme-binding sites of CcmF, leaving space to accommodate CcmG that now binds CcmF with CcmH.
“The CcmH N-terminal domain moves closer to the heme-binding sites of CcmF, leaving space to accommodate CcmG that now binds CcmF with CcmH.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the absence of CcmE, the N-terminus of CcmH occupies the site otherwise occupied by CcmE, moving closer to the HBS of CcmF.
“In the absence of CcmE, the N-terminus of CcmH occupies the site otherwise occupied by CcmE, essentially moving closer to the HBS of CcmF.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenProper modeling of CcmEFH and CcmFHI requires the cleavage of the N-terminal signal peptide of CcmH to obtain biologically accurate models.
“For instance, proper modeling of CcmEFH and CcmFHI requires the cleavage of the N-terminal signal peptide of CcmH to obtain biologically accurate models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe power of a deep learning-based approach for predicting direct protein-protein interactions has been demonstrated.
“Nevertheless, the power of a deep learning-based approach for predicting direct protein-protein interactions has been demonstrated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCcmF in our model does not expose a pore as observed in the TtCcmF structure, in which the pore was speculated to enable P-heme access.
“CcmF in our model does not expose a pore as observed in the TtCcmF structure, in which the pore was speculated to enable P-heme access49.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] Brausemann, A., Zhang, L., Ilcu, L. & Einsle, O. Architecture of the membrane-bound cytochrome c heme lyase CcmF. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 800–805 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataUsing AF2Complex without paired MSAs significantly enhances AF-Multimer and returns more physical complex models.
“which also significantly enhances AF-Multimer and returns more physical complex models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe two CcmH domains, encoded in two ORFs in some organisms but fused together in E. coli, are linked by a long loop without direct interactions.
“Interestingly, the two CcmH domains, encoded in two ORFs in some organisms but fused together in E. coli, are linked by a long loop without direct interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe lengths of the apocyt c peptides range from 8 to 52 residues, mostly around 18 AAs.
“The lengths of these apocyt c peptides range from 8 to 52 residues, mostly around 18 AAs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFiltering out pairs whose total size is longer than 1,480 residues led to 701 pairs from the positive set.
“Filtering led to 701 pairs from the positive set.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenFor an individual target of fewer than 1000 residues, models may be obtained within 20 min for each deep learning model using "super" mode.
“For an individual target of fewer than 1000 residues, models may be obtained within 20 min for each deep learning model using “super” mode”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAn AF2Complex run of ~7000 pairs of proteins using 923 nodes required about 2 hours in wall clock time.
“An AF2Complex run of ~7000 pairs of proteins using 923 nodes required about 2 hours in wall clock time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe score distributions do not follow normal distributions.
“because the score distributions do not follow normal distributions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenFor experimental structures, the interface clash indicator χ is typically between 0.6 and 1.2.
“For experimental structures, χ is typically between 0.6 and 1.2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll targets of Dimer1275 have identified four templates in the multimer protocol, but 82 targets have none or fewer than four templates identified in the monomer protocol that AF2Complex relies on for input generation.
“All targets of Dimer1275 have identified four templates in the multimer protocol, but 82 targets have none or fewer than four templates identified in the monomer protocol that AF2Complex relies on for input generation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo key factors contributing to AF2's success are the completeness of the structural space of single-domain proteins and an abundance of sequences in sequence databases.
“two key factors contributing to the success of AF2 are the completeness of the structural space of single-domain proteins and an abundance of sequences in sequence databases3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Skolnick, J., Gao, M., Zhou, H. & Singh, S. AlphaFold 2: Why It Works and Its Implications for Understanding the Relationships of Protein Sequence, Structure, and Function. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61, 4827–4831 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAF2 achieved remarkable performance on individual domains of target protein sequences in CASP14.
“In CASP14, a blind test for protein structure prediction, AF2 achieved remarkable performance when assessed on the individual domains of target protein sequences1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTemplate-based methods for predicting protein complex structures utilize experimentally resolved multimeric structures.
“A second class of approaches is template-based methods, which utilize experimentally resolved multimeric structures12–16.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [12] Aloy, P. et al. Structure-based assembly of protein complexes in yeast. Science 303, 2026–2029 (2004). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Chen, H. L. & Skolnick, J. M-TASSER: An algorithm for protein quaternary structure prediction. Biophys. J. 94, 918–928 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Zhang, Q. C., Petrey, D., Norel, R. & Honig, B. H. Protein interface conservation across structure space. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10896–10901 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Keskin, O., Nussinov, R. & Gursoy, A. PRISM: protein-protein interaction prediction by structural matching. Methods Mol. Biol. 484, 505–521 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Mukherjee, S. & Zhang, Y. Protein-Protein complex structure predictions by multimeric threading and template recombination. Structure 19, 955–966 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAF2 delivered excellent results on multidomain proteins and has been applied to such proteins in several model organisms.
“AF2 also delivered excellent results on multidomain proteins1 and has been applied to such proteins in several model organisms2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Tunyasuvunakool, K. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome. Nature 596, 590–596 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome examples of using a neural network model to predict complex structures were demonstrated with RoseTTAFold, whose design was inspired by AF2.
“some examples of using such a neural network model to predict complex structures were demonstrated with RoseTTAFold7, whose design was inspired by AF2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Baek, M. et al. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network. Science 373, 871–876 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMore recent methods incorporate inter-protein residue-residue contact predictions obtained via co-evolutionary analysis and a deep learning algorithm.
“More recent methods incorporate inter-protein residue-residue contact predictions obtained via co-evolutionary analysis17 and a deep learning algorithm18.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [17] Szurmant, H. & Weigt, M. Inter-residue, inter-protein and inter-family coevolution: bridging the scales. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 50, 26–32 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Zhou, T., Wang, S. & Xu, J. Deep learning reveals many more inter-protein residue-residue contacts than direct coupling analysis. bioRxiv, 240754 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStudies using AF2-generated monomer models with docking methods are based on the idea that AF2 generates high-quality monomeric models that could improve the chance of native-like poses in docking.
“studies have been carried out whereby models of single proteins generated with AF2 are used with docking methods. They are based on the idea that AF2 generates high-quality monomeric models that could improve the chance of native-like poses in docking22.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Ghani, U. et al. Improved docking of protein models by a combination of AlphaFold2 and ClusPro. bioRxiv, 2021.2009.2007.459290 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationOne main consequence of evolution is the diversification of protein functions by producing paralogs.
“one main consequence of evolution is the diversification of protein functions by producing paralogs30.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Koonin, E. V. Orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39, 309–338 (2005). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAn early study adapted AF2 to complex prediction by connecting two protein sequences with a poly-glycine linker.
“One early such study involved simply connecting two protein sequences with a poly-glycine linker, thus converting it into a single-chain structure prediction problem19.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Ko, J. & Lee, J. Can AlphaFold2 predict protein-peptide complex structures accurately? bioRxiv, 2021.2007.2027.453972 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIn docking studies using AF2 monomers, the benchmark set includes protein structures used to train AF2 deep learning models, and use of holo monomers compromises rigor because AF2 likely provides an observed holo-structure for docking.
“One issue with these studies, as some authors pointed out, is that the benchmark set tested includes protein structures used to train the AF2 deep learning models. Although the AF2 models were not trained on protein complex structures, the use of the holo monomers in training compromises rigor because AF2 likely provides an “observed” holo-structure for docking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Ghani, U. et al. Improved docking of protein models by a combination of AlphaFold2 and ClusPro. bioRxiv, 2021.2009.2007.459290 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHigh-throughput experimental techniques designed to identify interacting protein partners have results that are far from complete and often mutually inconsistent.
“Several high-throughput experimental techniques have been designed to identify interacting protein partners23–26, but their results are far from complete and are often mutually inconsistent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [23] Uetz, P. et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623–627 (2000). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Butland, G. et al. Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Nature 433, 531–537 (2005). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [25] Arifuzzaman, M. et al. Large-scale identification of protein–protein interaction of Escherichia coli K-12. Genome Res. 16, 686–691 (2006). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Yu, H. et al. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322, 104–110 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenRandom guessing yields an AUC0.1 of 0.05.
“For reference, random guessing yields an AUC0.1 of 0.05.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn the two CP17 cases where AF2Complex failed, each has one monomer with only single-digit depth in its monomeric MSAs, which may explain these failures.
“In these two failed cases, each has one monomer with only single-digit depth in its monomeric MSAs, which may explain these failures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Ccm system I consists of two modules: module 1 includes CcmABCD and is responsible for acquiring and loading a heme molecule onto the heme chaperone CcmE.
“it is thought that the Ccm system I consists of two modules: module 1 includes CcmABCD and is responsible for acquiring and loading a heme molecule onto the heme chaperone CcmE43.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Feissner, R. E., Richard-Fogal, C. L., Frawley, E. R. & Kranz, R. G. ABC transporter-mediated release of a haem chaperone allows cytochrome c biogenesis. Mol. Microbiol. 61, 219–231 (2006). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese models are likely biologically relevant, and heme was modeled in the expected sites in all these models.
“These models are likely biologically relevant, and we were able to model the heme in the expected sites in all these models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenGroL is part of a large assembly that requires seven GroL copies forming a ring stacked with another heptameric GroE ring.
“It is part of a large assembly that requires seven GroL copies forming a ring stacked with another heptameric GroE ring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: GroL is part of a large assembly that requires seven GroL copies forming a ring stacked with another heptameric GroE ring.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCcmE shuttles the heme from module 1 to module 2, composed of CcmFGH, where the heme is delivered to CcmF.
“CcmE then shuttles the heme from module 1 to module 2, composed of CcmFGH, where the heme is delivered to CcmF44.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] San Francisco, B. & Kranz, R. G. Interaction of HoloCcmE with CcmF in Heme Trafficking and Cytochrome c Biosynthesis. J. Mol. Biol. 426, 570–585 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenE. coli CcmH has a fused C-terminal domain that appears as the standalone protein CcmI in other species with a similar Ccm system.
“E. coli CcmH has a fused C-terminal domain that appears as the standalone protein CcmI in other species with a similar Ccm system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThese proteins belong to the cytochrome c maturation (Ccm) system I, which is composed of eight constituents (CcmABCDEFGH).
“These proteins belong to the cytochrome c maturation (Ccm) system I, which is composed of eight constituents (CcmABCDEFGH)33,34.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Sanders, C., Turkarslan, S., Lee, D. W. & Daldal, F. Cytochrome c biogenesis: the Ccm system. Trends Microbiol. 18, 266–274 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Kranz, R. G., Richard-Fogal, C., Taylor, J. S. & Frawley, E. R. Cytochrome c biogenesis: mechanisms for covalent modifications and trafficking of heme and for heme-iron redox control. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73, 510–528 (2009). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe main reason for the knowledge gap is that the assemblies involve transient but essential interactions among membrane proteins (except for CcmA) that are difficult to capture experimentally.
“The main reason for this knowledge gap is that the assemblies involve transient but essential interactions among membrane proteins (except for CcmA) that are difficult to capture experimentally.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningMany mechanistic details of the Ccm system are still unclear, in part because there are no structures of the assembled modules.
“Many mechanistic details of the Ccm system are still unclear, in part because there are no structures of the assembled modules.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis conformation presumably corresponds to a resting state before heme loading, after heme unloading, or both.
“This conformation presumably corresponds to a resting state before heme loading, after heme unloading, or both.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCcmFGH covalently attaches the heme to nascent cytochrome c-type proteins.
“Subsequently, CcmFGH covalently attaches the heme to nascent cytochrome c-type proteins45,46.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [45] San Francisco, B., Sutherland, M. C. & Kranz, R. G. The CcmFH complex is the system I holocytochrome c synthetase: engineering cytochrome c maturation independent of CcmABCDE. Mol. Microbiol. 91, 996–1008 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [46] Verissimo, A. F. et al. The thioreduction component CcmG confers efficiency and the heme ligation component CcmH ensures stereo-specificity during cytochrome c maturation. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 13154–13167 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationA critical loop containing the equivalent histidine of E. coli His303CcmF is missing in the TtCcmF structure, suggesting that the P-heme binding pocket might be flexible.
“a critical loop containing the equivalent histidine of E. coli His303CcmF is missing in the TtCcmF structure, suggesting that the P-heme binding pocket might be flexible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThese large conformational changes could be the result of ATP hydrolysis within CcmA.
“These large conformational changes could be the result of ATP hydrolysis within CcmA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAs previously proposed, the energy of ATP hydrolysis could be harnessed to release the cargo-loaded CcmE.
“As previously proposed43, the energy of the hydrolysis could be harnessed to release the cargo-loaded CcmE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Feissner, R. E., Richard-Fogal, C. L., Frawley, E. R. & Kranz, R. G. ABC transporter-mediated release of a haem chaperone allows cytochrome c biogenesis. Mol. Microbiol. 61, 219–231 (2006). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCcmF has two heme-binding sites: one (P-heme) for the cytochrome attachment and the other accessory heme (TM-heme) that assists in the ejection of the P-heme.
“CcmF has two heme-binding sites: one (P-heme) for the cytochrome attachment and the other accessory heme (TM-heme) that assists in the ejection of the P-heme34.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Kranz, R. G., Richard-Fogal, C., Taylor, J. S. & Frawley, E. R. Cytochrome c biogenesis: mechanisms for covalent modifications and trafficking of heme and for heme-iron redox control. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73, 510–528 (2009). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenHis303 is highly conserved and is known to coordinate the Fe center of P-heme.
“His303 is highly conserved and is known to coordinate the Fe center of P-heme.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe pore may allow the access of heme from the outer leaflet, but no channel for potential heme trafficking is present within CcmC, as previously speculated.
“The pore may allow the access of heme from the outer leaflet, but no channel for potential heme trafficking is present within CcmC, as previously speculated48.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Richard-Fogal, C. & Kranz, R. G. The CcmC:heme:CcmE complex in heme trafficking and cytochrome c biosynthesis. J. Mol. Biol. 401, 350–362 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningOne major hurdle to this bottom-up approach for predicting protein interactions is that the context of such a hypothetical complex is often unavailable a priori.
“One major hurdle to this bottom-up approach for predicting protein interactions is that the context of such a hypothetical complex is often unavailable a priori.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDocking studies suggest that our models are consistent with known biochemical evidence, though other conformations are also expected.
“Although the approach is currently limited to structural models without directly incorporating a heme, docking studies suggest that our models are consistent with known biochemical evidence, though other conformations are also expected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe structural difference may be attributed to a lipid molecule occupying the pore in the crystal structure but absent in our computational model.
“The structural difference may be attributed to a lipid molecule occupying the pore in the crystal structure but absent in our computational model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe CXXC motif of CcmH then reverts to the oxidized state, and CcmG dissociates to be reduced by the thiol-disulfide interchange protein DsbD.
“The CXXC motif of CcmH then reverts to the oxidized state, and CcmG dissociates to be reduced by the thiol-disulfide interchange protein DsbD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test whether the model quality of one model is better than another in terms of a scoring metric, with paired and one-tailed tests.
“To test the hypothesis that the model quality of one model is better than another one in terms of a scoring metric, e.g., the DockQ score, we used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, a non-parametric statistical test, because the score distributions do not follow normal distributions. The tests were paired, as every method makes a prediction on the same set of targets. All tests are one-tailed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenIn the benchmark test of the 17 targets, three independent runs were carried out, and each generated five top models.
“In the benchmark test of the 17 targets, three independent runs were carried out, and each generated five top models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNrfA contains five CXXC motifs for covalent heme attachment.
“NrfA contains five CXXC motifs for covalent heme attachment59.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Clarke, T. A. et al. Role of a Conserved Glutamine Residue in Tuning the Catalytic Activity of Escherichia coli Cytochrome c Nitrite Reductase. Biochemistry 47, 3789–3799 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe structural templates from the PDB were restricted to those dated before the same cutoff date for the AF2 training structures.
“We used the same sequence library as above but restricted the structural templates from the PDB to those dated before the same cutoff date for the AF2 training structures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Intra-protein domain-domain interactions are not physically different from interprotein interactions.
“Considering that intra-protein domain-domain interactions are not physically different from interprotein interactions, these AF2 results are very intriguing.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
All protein pairs other than the CP17 pairs are non-interacting.
“Here, we naively assumed that all protein pairs other than the CP17 pairs are non-interacting, and any hit above a cutoff value of a metric adopted for evaluation is a false positive.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most pairs of proteins are non-interacting.
“Because we expect that most pairs of proteins are non-interacting, we focus on the regime of low false-positive rate (i.e., FP < 0.1) in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.”
The paper relies on this without support.
GroL is part of a large assembly that requires seven GroL copies forming a ring stacked with another heptameric GroE ring.
“It is part of a large assembly that requires seven GroL copies forming a ring stacked with another heptameric GroE ring.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
All assemblies in the Earlier Set were used for DL training.
“We assume all assemblies in the Earlier Set were used for DL training and removed all the “easy” homologs in the Later Set by using the 30% sequence identity clusters of all protein sequences provided by the PDB.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Protein-protein interactions are not physicochemically different from what drives protein folding.
“After all, protein-protein interactions are not physicochemically different from what drives protein folding in the first place.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PPIs have already been modeled with small adaptations to the original AlphaFold2 algorithm.
“First, PPIs have already been modeled with small adaptations to the original algorithm.247,248”
From Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation via Multiomics Profiling and Artificial Intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [247]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Figure 8 assigns CcmF histidines to CcmE
MinorThe Figure 8 caption labels His173 and His303 as residues of CcmE, but the text explicitly identifies both as CcmF residues coordinating P-heme.
“the P-heme-binding histidines (His173 and His303) of CcmE are shown in the vdW representations in the inset.”
“Consistently, the heme-bound model displays the P-heme coordination role of His303CcmF and His173CcmF”
Figure 8 names the wrong complex for the apocyt models
MinorThe Figure 8 caption calls the apocyt-containing models CcmEFH complexes, while the accompanying text says that apocyt peptides were modeled with CcmFGH.
“b Superposition of 22 AF2Complex models of the CcmEFH and apocyt acceptors. CcmFGH complexes are shown in lines, and apocyts are shown as cyan tubes.”
“To investigate further, we modeled CcmFGH together with 11 different apocyt peptides, each containing one or two CXXCH motifs.”
Assembly subsets do not sum to the stated total
MinorThe two subsets contain 92,047 + 24,853 = 116,900 assemblies, not 120,703. The stated split leaves 3,803 assemblies unaccounted for.
Reported 120703 · recomputed 116900
“First, we retrieved the information of all 120,703 protein assemblies on Jan 7, 2022, from the PDB. They were split into two subsets, 92,047 complex structures (Earlier Set) released prior to Apr 30, 2018, and 24,853 assemblies (Later Set) released after that date”
Benchmark set sizes differ between Results and Methods
MinorThe Results describe a benchmark of 1,192 dimers and 593 oligomers, whereas the Methods name the final benchmark sets as 1,193 dimers and 562 oligomers.
“a large-scale benchmark study was further carried out on 1,192 dimers and 593 oligomers.”
“These two final sets are called Dimer1275 and Oligomer562, respectively. Because the mapping of chains between model and experimental structure is an open issue for automated assessment of high-order oligomers, primarily due to the combinatorial growth of identical or homologous copies, we mainly focused on the dimer set in this study. However, we provide an evaluation of the physicality of the predicted Oligomer562 models.”
CcmFGH passage refers to a binding site on absent CcmE
MinorThe CcmFGH description says the substrate reaches the heme-binding site of CcmE, although the same passage specifies that CcmE is absent from this complex and identifies CcmF as having the relevant site.
“to reach the HBS of CcmE (Fig. 8a).”
“In the absence of CcmE, the N-terminus of CcmH occupies the site otherwise occupied by CcmE, essentially moving closer to the HBS of CcmF.”
Cites
VMD: visual molecular dynamics
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., & Schulten, K. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Graphics · doi:10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · Cited by 66,952 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196 · see citing works
ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all
Mirdita, M., Schütze, K., Moriwaki, Y., Heo, L., Ovchinnikov, S., & Steinegger, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · Cited by 9,391 · see citing works
UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge
The UniProt Consortium (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1049 · Cited by 7,698 · see citing works
Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a 3-track network
Baek, M., DiMaio, F., Anishchenko, I., Dauparas, J., Ovchinnikov, S., Lee, G. R., Wang, J., Cong, Q., Kinch, L. N., Schaeffer, R. D., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.14.448402 · Cited by 5,542 · see citing works
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706 · see citing works
Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer
Evans, R., O’Neill, M., Pritzel, A., Antropova, N., Senior, A., Green, T., Žídek, A., Bates, R., Blackwell, S., Yim, J., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · Cited by 3,808 · see citing works
The ClusPro web server for protein–protein docking
Kozakov, D., Hall, D. R., Xia, B., Porter, K. A., Padhorny, D., Yueh, C., Beglov, D., & Vajda, S. (2017) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.169 · Cited by 3,297 · see citing works
HADDOCK: A Protein−Protein Docking Approach Based on Biochemical or Biophysical Information
Dominguez, C., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026939x · Cited by 3,187 · see citing works
ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R
Sing, T., Sander, O., Beerenwinkel, N., & Lengauer, T. (2005) · Computer applications in the biosciences · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti623 · Cited by 3,172 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome
Tunyasuvunakool, K., Adler, J., Wu, Z., Green, T., Zielinski, M., Žídek, A., Bridgland, A., Cowie, A., Meyer, C., Laydon, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · Cited by 3,025 · see citing works
Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality
Zhang, Y., & Skolnick, J. (2004) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20264 · Cited by 2,392 · see citing works
Self-citationDetecting Protein Function and Protein-Protein Interactions from Genome Sequences
Marcotte, E. M., Pellegrini, M., Ng, H.-L., Rice, D. W., Yeates, T. O., & Eisenberg, D. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5428.751 · Cited by 1,670 · see citing works
ZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm
Chen, R., Li, L., & Weng, Z. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10389 · Cited by 1,393 · see citing works
High-Quality Binary Protein Interaction Map of the Yeast Interactome Network
Yu, H., Braun, P., Yıldırım, M. A., Lemmens, I., Venkatesan, K., Sahalie, J., Hirozane-Kishikawa, T., Gebreab, F., Li, N., Simonis, N., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158684 · Cited by 1,392 · see citing works
Orthologs, Paralogs, and Evolutionary Genomics
Koonin, E. V. (2005) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.114725 · Cited by 1,323 · see citing works
Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli
Butland, G., Peregrín-Alvarez, J. M., Li, J., Yang, W., Yang, X., Canadien, V., Starostine, A., Richards, D., Beattie, B., Krogan, N., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03239 · Cited by 1,201 · see citing works
The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt): an expanding universe of protein information
Wu, C. H. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj161 · Cited by 1,116 · see citing works
Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2
Bryant, P., Pozzati, G., & Elofsson, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.15.460468 · Cited by 1,025 · see citing works
PIPER: An FFT‐based protein docking program with pairwise potentials
Kozakov, D., Brenke, R., Comeau, S. R., & Vajda, S. (2006) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21117 · Cited by 865 · see citing works
Uniclust databases of clustered and deeply annotated protein sequences and alignments
Mirdita, M., von den Driesch, L., Galiez, C., Martin, M. J., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1081 · Cited by 710 · see citing works
Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact?
Keskin, O., Gursoy, A., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040409x · Cited by 697 · see citing works
MGnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020
Mitchell, A. L., Almeida, A., Beracochea, M., Boland, M., Burgin, J., Cochrane, G., Crusoe, M. R., Kale, V., Potter, S. C., Richardson, L. J., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1035 · Cited by 562 · see citing works
Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes
Humphreys, I. R., Pei, J., Baek, M., Krishnakumar, A., Anishchenko, I., Ovchinnikov, S., Zhang, J., Ness, T. J., Banjade, S., Bagde, S. R., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abm4805 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
DockQ: A Quality Measure for Protein-Protein Docking Models
Basu, S., & Wallner, B. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Protein-level assembly increases protein sequence recovery from metagenomic samples manyfold
Steinegger, M., Mirdita, M., & Söding, J. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0437-4 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Large-scale identification of protein–protein interaction of <i>Escherichia coli</i> K-12
Arifuzzaman, M., Maeda, M., Itoh, A., Nishikata, K., Takita, C., Saito, R., Ara, T., Nakahigashi, K., Huang, H.-C., Hirai, A., et al. (2006) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.4527806 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Global Functional Atlas of Escherichia coli Encompassing Previously Uncharacterized Proteins
Hu, P., Janga, S. C., Babu, M., Díaz-Mejía, J. J., Butland, G., Yang, W., Pogoutse, O., Guo, X., Phanse, S., Wong, P., et al. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000096 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Structure-Based Assembly of Protein Complexes in Yeast
Aloy, P., Böttcher, B., Ceulemans, H., Leutwein, C., Mellwig, C., Fischer, S., Gavin, A.-C., Bork, P., Superti-Furga, G., Serrano, L., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1092645 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Protein-Protein Docking: From Interaction to Interactome
Vakser, I. A. (2014) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.033 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
A Pareto-Optimal Refinement Method for Protein Design Scaffolds
Nivón, L. G., Moretti, R., & Baker, D. A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059004 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Kranz, R. G., Richard-Fogal, C., Taylor, J.-S., & Frawley, E. R. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00001-09 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Skolnick, J., Gao, M., Zhou, H., & Singh, S. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01114 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Self-citationProtein interaction networks revealed by proteome coevolution
Cong, Q., Anishchenko, I., Ovchinnikov, S., & Baker, D. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw6718 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Cytochrome c biogenesis: the Ccm system
Sanders, C., Turkarslan, S., Lee, D.-W., & Daldal, F. (2010) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2010.03.006 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Mukherjee, S., & Zhang, Y. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp318 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Protein-Protein Complex Structure Predictions by Multimeric Threading and Template Recombination
Mukherjee, S., & Zhang, Y. (2011) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2011.04.006 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Protein interface conservation across structure space
Zhang, Q. C., Petrey, D., Norel, R., & Honig, B. H. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1005894107 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Gao, M., & Skolnick, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1012820107 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationPrediction of protein assemblies, the next frontier: The CASP14‐CAPRI experiment
Lensink, M. F., Brysbaert, G., Mauri, T., Nadzirin, N., Velankar, S. S., Chaleil, R. A. G., Clarence, T., Bates, P. A., Kong, R., Liu, B., et al. (2021) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26222 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
iAlign: a method for the structural comparison of protein–protein interfaces
Gao, M., & Skolnick, J. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq404 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationABC transporter‐mediated release of a haem chaperone allows cytochrome <i>c</i> biogenesis
Feissner, R. E., Richard‐Fogal, C. L., Frawley, E. R., & Kranz, R. G. (2006) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05221.x · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Can AlphaFold2 predict protein-peptide complex structures accurately?
Ko, J., & Lee, J. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.07.27.453972 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Inter-residue, inter-protein and inter-family coevolution: bridging the scales
Szurmant, H., & Weigt, M. (2018) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2017.10.014 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Prism: Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction by Structural Matching
Keskin, O., Nussinov, R., & Gursoy, A. (2008) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-398-1_30 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
M-TASSER: An Algorithm for Protein Quaternary Structure Prediction
Chen, H., & Skolnick, J. (2008) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.114280 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationImproved Docking of Protein Models by a Combination of Alphafold2 and ClusPro
Ghani, U., Desta, I., Jindal, A., Khan, O., Jones, G., Hashemi, N., Kotelnikov, S., Padhorny, D., Vajda, S., & Kozakov, D. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.07.459290 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
The CcmC:Heme:CcmE Complex in Heme Trafficking and Cytochrome c Biosynthesis
Richard-Fogal, C., & Kranz, R. G. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.06.041 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Dunce, J. M., Salmon, L. J., & Davies, O. R. (2021) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-021-00636-z · Cited by 46 · see citing works
New benchmark metrics for protein‐protein docking methods
Gao, M., & Skolnick, J. (2011) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22987 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationAssessment of the <scp>CASP14</scp> assembly predictions
Ozden, B., Kryshtafovych, A., & Karaca, E. (2021) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26199 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Clarke, T. A., Kemp, G. L., Wonderen, J. H. V., Doyle, R.-M. A. S., Cole, J. A., Tovell, N., Cheesman, M. R., Butt, J. N., Richardson, D. J., & Hemmings, A. M. (2008) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi702175w · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Cryo-EM of CcsBA reveals the basis for cytochrome c biogenesis and heme transport
Mendez, D. L., Lowder, E. P., Tillman, D. E., Sutherland, M. C., Collier, A. L., Rau, M., Fitzpatrick, J. A. J., & Kranz, R. G. (2021) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-021-00935-y · Cited by 31 · see citing works
San Francisco, B., Sutherland, M. C., & Kranz, R. G. (2014) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/mmi.12510 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Architecture of the membrane-bound cytochrome c heme lyase CcmF
Brausemann, A., Zhang, L., Ilcu, L., & Einsle, O. (2021) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-021-00793-8 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Deep learning reveals many more inter-protein residue-residue contacts than direct coupling analysis
Zhou, T.-M., Wang, S., & Xu, J. (2017) · doi:10.1101/240754 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Interaction of HoloCcmE with CcmF in Heme Trafficking and Cytochrome c Biosynthesis
San Francisco, B., & Kranz, R. G. (2014) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.10.025 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Structurally Mapping Endogenous Heme in the CcmCDE Membrane Complex for Cytochrome c Biogenesis
Sutherland, M. C., Jarodsky, J. M., Ovchinnikov, S., Baker, D., & Kranz, R. G. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2018.01.022 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Verissimo, A. F., Khalfaoui-Hassani, B., Hwang, J., Steimle, S., Selamoglu, N., Sanders, C., Khatchikian, C. E., & Daldal, F. (2017) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m117.794586 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Gong, W., Guerler, A., Zhang, C., Warner, E., Li, C., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166944 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
High-Performance Deep Learning Toolbox for Genome-Scale Prediction of Protein Structure and Function
Gao, M., Lund-Andersen, P. K., Morehead, A., Mahmud, S., Chen, C., Chen, X., Giri, N., Roy, R. S., Quadir, F., Effler, T. C., et al. (2021) · Workshop on Machine Learning in HPC Environments · doi:10.1109/mlhpc54614.2021.00010 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationProteome-scale Deployment of Protein Structure Prediction Workflows on the Summit Supercomputer
Gao, M., Coletti, M. A., Davidson, R. B., et al. (2022) · IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW) · doi:10.1109/ipdpsw55747.2022.00045 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationGao, M., Nakajima An, D., Parks, J. M., et al. (2022) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6339740 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationProteome-scale Deployment of Protein Structure Prediction Workflows on the Summit SupercomputerPreprint
Gao, M., Coletti, M. A., Davidson, R. B., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.10024 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationGao, M., An, D. N., Parks, J. M., et al. (2022) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6084185 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Gao, M. et al. in 2021 IEEE/ACM Workshop on Machine Learning in High Performance Computing Environments (MLHPC). 46-57.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins
Agarwal, V., & McShan, A. C. (2024) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-024-01638-w · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“When more than one input sequence is provided, AlphaFold-Multimer or AF2Complex is used 20,21 .”
MethodFrom interaction networks to interfaces, scanning intrinsically disordered regions using AlphaFold2
Bret, H., Gao, J., Zea, D. J., Andreani, J., & Guerois, R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44288-7 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation via Multiomics Profiling and Artificial Intelligence
Duran-Frigola, M., Cigler, M., & Winter, G. E. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.2c11098 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
AlphaFold2 enables accurate deorphanization of ligands to single-pass receptors
Banhos Danneskiold-Samsøe, N., Kavi, D., Jude, K. M., Nissen, S. B., Wat, L. W., Coassolo, L., Zhao, M., Santana-Oikawa, G. A., Broido, B. B., Garcia, K. C., et al. (2024) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2024.10.004 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Challenges in bridging the gap between protein structure prediction and functional interpretation
Varadi, M., Tsenkov, M., & Velankar, S. (2025) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26614 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
McCafferty, C. L., Pennington, E. L., Papoulas, O., Taylor, D. W., & Marcotte, E. M. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04773-7 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Tollefson, M. R., Gogal, R. A., Weaver, A. M., Schaefer, A. M., Marini, R. J., Azaiez, H., Kolbe, D. L., Wang, D., Weaver, A. E., Casavant, T. L., et al. (2023) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-023-02559-9 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Template-free prediction of a new monotopic membrane protein fold and assembly by AlphaFold2
Gulsevin, A., Han, B., Porta, J. C., Mchaourab, H. S., Meiler, J., & Kenworthy, A. K. (2023) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2022.11.011 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Wang, B., Wang, C., Chen, J., Liu, D., Sun, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, K., & Li, H. (2026) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-026-01198-9 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gao, M., Nakajima An, D., Parks, J. M., & Skolnick, J.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gao, Mu
- Skolnick, Jeffrey
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2022-04-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1744-1744
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8975832
- OpenAlex
- W4220990251
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 18.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH R35GM118039, R35GM118039)
- DOE | SC | Biological and Environmental Research (DOE DE-SC0021303)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction, multimeric proteins, AlphaFold2, protein structure prediction, protein-protein docking, Escherichia coli proteome, deep learning
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Escherichia coli, Sequence Alignment, Neural Networks, Computer, Proteome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review