The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving the Density of Jammed Disordered Packings Using Ellipsoids
Abstract
Packing problems, such as how densely objects can fill a volume, are among the most ancient and persistent problems in mathematics and science. For equal spheres, it has only recently been proved that the face-centered cubic lattice has the highest possible packing fraction \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \({\varphi}={\pi}{/}\sqrt{18}{\approx}0.74\) \end{document} . It is also well known that certain random (amorphous) jammed packings have φ ≈ 0.64. Here, we show experimentally and with a new simulation algorithm that ellipsoids can randomly pack more densely—up to φ= 0.68 to 0.71for spheroids with an aspect ratio close to that of M&M's Candies—and even approach φ ≈ 0.74 for ellipsoids with other aspect ratios. We suggest that the higher density is directly related to the higher number of degrees of freedom per particle and thus the larger number of particle contacts required to mechanically stabilize the packing. We measured the number of contacts per particle Z ≈ 10 for our spheroids, as compared to Z ≈ 6 for spheres. Our results have implications for a broad range of scientific disciplines, including the properties of granular media and ceramics, glass formation, and discrete geometry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Refinements to colloid model of C-S-H in cement: CM-II
Jennings, H. M. (2008) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.10.006 · Cited by 1,049
Torquato, S. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.03.001 · Cited by 499
Self-citationChen, J. J., Sorelli, L., Vandamme, M., Ulm, F., & Chanvillard, G. (2010) · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · doi:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03599.x · Cited by 369
Jamming transition as a paradigm to understand the loss landscape of deep neural networks
Geiger, M., Spigler, S., d'Ascoli, S., Sagun, L., Baity-Jesi, M., Biroli, G., & Wyart, M. (2019) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.100.012115 · Cited by 143
Review on the structure of random packed‐beds
von Seckendorff, J., & Hinrichsen, O. (2021) · The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cjce.23959 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Donev, A., Cisse, I., Sachs, D., Variano, E. A., Stillinger, F. H., Connelly, R., Torquato, S., & Chaikin, P. M.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2004-02-13
- Volume
- 303
- Issue
- 5660
- Pages
- 990-993
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2086806466
- Cited by
- 1,261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 55.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving the Density of Jammed Disordered Packings Using Ellipsoids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1093010
- The paper
- Donev, A., Cisse, I., Sachs, D., Variano, E. A., Stillinger, F. H., Connelly, R., Torquato, S., & Chaikin, P. M. (2004). Improving the Density of Jammed Disordered Packings Using Ellipsoids. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1093010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.