Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management

Open access
Pikitch, E. K., Santora, C., Babcock, E. A., Bakun, A., Bonfil, R., Conover, D. O., Dayton, P., Doukakis, P., Fluharty, D., Heneman, B., Houde, E. D., Link, J., Livingston, P. A., Mangel, M., McAllister, M. K., Pope, J., Sainsbury, K. J.·2004·Science

Abstract

Many of the worlds fish populationsare overexploited, and the ecosystemsthat sustain them are degraded(1). Unintended consequences of fishing, includinghabitat destruction, incidental mortalityof nontarget species, evolutionary shiftsin population demographics, and changes inthe function and structure of ecosystems, arebeing increasingly recognized.Fisheries management to date has oftenbeen ineffective; it focuses on maximizingthe catch of a single target species and oftenignores habitat, predators, and prey ofthe target species and other ecosystemcomponents and interactions. The indirectsocial and economic costs of the focus onsingle species can be substantial. For example,over 90% of the annual mortality ofwhite marlin, a species petitioned for listingunder the U.S. Endangered SpeciesAct, occurs through incidental catch inswordfish and tuna longline fisheries. Thisthreatens a recreational fishing industryworth up to U.S.$2 billion annually (2).To address the critical need for a moreeffective and holistic management approach,a variety of advisory panels (39)have recommended ecosystem considerationsbe considered broadly and consistentlyin managing fisheries. Ecosystem-basedfishery management (EBFM) is a new directionfor fishery management, essentiallyreversing the order of management prioritiesto start with the ecosystem ratherthan the target species.The overall objective of EBFM is tosustain healthy marine ecosystems and thefisheries they support. In particular, EBFMshould (i) avoid degradation of ecosystems,as measured by indicators of environmentalquality and system status; (ii)minimize the risk of irreversible change tonatural assemblages of species and ecosystemprocesses; (iii) obtain and maintainlong-term socioeconomic benefits withoutcompromising the ecosystem; and (iv) generateknowledge of ecosystem processessufficient to understand the likely consequencesof human actions. Where knowledgeis insufficient, robust and precautionaryfishery management measures that favorthe ecosystem should be adopted.We need to derive and develop communityand system-level standards, referencepoints, and control rules analogous to singlespeciesdecision criteria (1012). We maywant to ensure that total biomass removed byall fisheries in an ecosystem does not exceeda total amount of system productivity, afteraccounting for the requirements of otherecosystem components (e.g., nontargetspecies, protected species, habitat considerations,and various trophic interactions).Maintaining system characteristics withincertain bounds may protect ecosystem resilienceand avoid irreversible changes.EBFM must delineate all marine habitatsutilized by humans in the context ofvulnerability to fishing-induced and otherhuman impacts, identify the potential irreversibilityof those impacts, and elucidatehabitats critical to species for vital populationprocesses. Protecting essential habitatfor fish and other important ecosystemcomponents from destructive fishing practicesincreases fish diversity and abundance(13, 14). Thus, ocean zoning, inwhich type and level of allowable humanactivity are specified spatially and temporally,will be a critical element of EBFM.The impacts of fisheries on endangeredand protected species, including ecologicalprocesses that are essential for their recovery,should be managed through an EBFMapproach. Single-species management hasbeen successful at reducing incidentalcatch of protected species in some cases(e.g., with turtle excluder devices intrawls), but EBFM would also manage indirecteffects (e.g., protecting forage fishnear sea lion rookeries).Another goal of EBFM is to reduce excessivelevels of bycatch (i.e., killing ofnontarget species or undersized individualsof the target species), because juvenile lifestages and unmarketable species often playimportant roles in the ecosystem (15, 16).Globally, discards in commercial fisherieshave been estimated at 27.0 million metrictons, accounting for about one-fourth ofthe worlds marine fish catch (17). Bycatchproblems can be ameliorated throughocean zoning that would prohibit use ofnonselective or destructive gear in criticalareas, as well as through the development and deployment of more selective and less damaging fishing technologies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1098222

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 2,312

Metadata

Authors
Pikitch, E. K., Santora, C., Babcock, E. A., Bakun, A., Bonfil, R., Conover, D. O., Dayton, P., Doukakis, P., Fluharty, D., Heneman, B., Houde, E. D., Link, J., Livingston, P. A., Mangel, M., McAllister, M. K., Pope, J., & Sainsbury, K. J.
Venue
Science
Published
2004-07-16
Volume
305
Issue
5682
Pages
346-347
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1543409689
Cited by
2,312
References
4
FWCI
57.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1098222
The paper
Pikitch, E. K., Santora, C., Babcock, E. A., Bakun, A., Bonfil, R., Conover, D. O., Dayton, P., Doukakis, P., Fluharty, D., Heneman, B., Houde, E. D., Link, J., Livingston, P. A., Mangel, M., McAllister, M. K., Pope, J., & Sainsbury, K. J. (2004). Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1098222

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.