Cited by 646Marine and fisheries researchFisheries and Aquaculture StudiesFish Ecology and Management Studies

Systematic distortions in world fisheries catch trends

Open access
Watson, Reg, Pauly, Daniel·2001·Nature

Abstract

Over 75% of the world marine fisheries catch (over 80 million tonnes per year) is sold on international markets, in contrast to other food commodities (such as rice). At present, only one institution, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) maintains global fisheries statistics. As an intergovernmental organization, however, FAO must generally rely on the statistics provided by member countries, even if it is doubtful that these correspond to reality. Here we show that misreporting by countries with large fisheries, combined with the large and widely fluctuating catch of species such as the Peruvian anchoveta, can cause globally spurious trends. Such trends influence unwise investment decisions by firms in the fishing sector and by banks, and prevent the effective management of international fisheries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35107050

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Globally, although there has been little or no increase in sea fish consumption per capita since the 1960s, catches per year have risen exponentially and freshwater fish intake has increased during this time.

    “Globally, although there has been little or no increase in sea fish consumption per capita since the 1960s, catches per year have risen exponentially (75) and freshwater fish intake has intake has increased during this time (71).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watson, R., & Pauly, D.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Watson, Reg
Venue
Nature
Published
2001-11
Volume
414
Issue
6863
Pages
534-536
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2029579385
Cited by
646
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 38
FWCI
36.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Pew Charitable Trusts
  • National Science Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Fisheries and Aquaculture Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
catch statistics, catch trends, Peruvian anchoveta, fisheries management
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Animals, China, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fisheries, Fishes, International Cooperation, United Nations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review