The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pleistocene Park: Return of the Mammoth's Ecosystem
Abstract
About 10,000 years ago, when the million-year-long Pleistocene epoch gave way to the ongoing Holocene epoch, much of the world's ecosystems changed. In what is now northern Siberia, vast numbers of large animals, among them mammoths, woolly rhinoceroses, and yaks, both thrived on and nurtured the steppes that, compared to other northern regions of the world, remained relatively unscathed from the repeated advances and retreats of ice sheets. Even so, the steppes there gave way to silt, dust, and ice-based tundra landscapes dominated in some places by forests and in others by mosses. The large animals disappeared. [Sergey Zimov][1], director of the Northeast Science Station in Cherskii in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), argues that climate change may not have been the primary reason behind the demise of this Pleistocene ecosystem. Instead, he says changing hunting practices wiped out the large animals whose absence led to the ecosystem shifts. He and his colleagues now are reintroducing bison, Yakutian horses, and other animals, eventually even tigers, in an attempt to reconstitute the Pleistocene ecosystem. The experiment will test the hypothesis that humans, rather than climate change, caused the ecosystem shift at the beginning of the Holocene. The stabilization of the northern tundra soils that this reconstitution could bring also could prevent the release of vast amount of carbon now sequestered in the Siberian soils but in danger of being released in the warmer times projected for the future. All essays appearing in this series can be found online at [www.sciencemag.org/sciext/globalvoices/][2] * * * [1]: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/308/5723/796 [2]: http://www.sciencemag.org/sciext/globalvoices/
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lorimer, J. (2010) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.5749/9781452944289 · Cited by 624
Science for a wilder Anthropocene: Synthesis and future directions for trophic rewilding research
Svenning, J.-C., Pedersen, P. B. M., Donlan, C. J., Ejrnæs, R., Faurby, S., Galetti, M., Hansen, D. M., Sandel, B., Sandom, C. J., Terborgh, J. W., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1502556112 · Cited by 614
Megafauna and ecosystem function from the Pleistocene to the Anthropocene
Malhi, Y., Doughty, C. E., Galetti, M., Smith, F. A., Svenning, J.-C., & Terborgh, J. W. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1502540113 · Cited by 567
Terrestrial Ecosystem Responses to Species Gains and Losses
Wardle, D. A., Bardgett, R. D., Callaway, R. M., & Van der Putten, W. H. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1197479 · Cited by 507
Hayward, M. W., & Kerley, G. I. H. (2009) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.022 · Cited by 489
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimov, S. A.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2005-05-06
- Volume
- 308
- Issue
- 5723
- Pages
- 796-798
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1578225997
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pleistocene Park: Return of the Mammoth's Ecosystem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1113442
- The paper
- Zimov, S. A. (2005). Pleistocene Park: Return of the Mammoth's Ecosystem. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1113442
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.