The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wildlife in the Anthropocene
Abstract
Elephants rarely breed in captivity and are not considered domesticated, yet they interact with people regularly and adapt to various environments. Too social and sagacious to be objects, too strange to be human, too captive to truly be wild, but too wild to be domesticated—where do elephants fall in our understanding of nature? In Wildlife in the Anthropocene, Jamie Lorimer argues that the idea of nature as a pure and timeless place characterized by the absence of humans has come to an end. But life goes on. Wildlife inhabits everywhere and is on the move; Lorimer proposes the concept of wildlife as a replacement for nature. Offering a thorough appraisal of the Anthropocene—an era in which human actions affect and influence all life and all systems on our planet—Lorimer unpacks its implications for changing definitions of nature and the politics of wildlife conservation. Wildlife in the Anthropocene examines rewilding, the impacts of wildlife films, human relationships with charismatic species, and urban wildlife. Analyzing scientific papers, policy documents, and popular media, as well as a decade of fieldwork, Lorimer explores the new interconnections between science, politics, and neoliberal capitalism that the Anthropocene demands of wildlife conservation. Imagining conservation in a world where humans are geological actors entangled within and responsible for powerful, unstable, and unpredictable planetary forces, this work nurtures a future environmentalism that is more hopeful and democratic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What Is Natural? The Need for a Long-Term Perspective in Biodiversity Conservation
Willis, K. J., & Birks, H. J. B. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1122667 · Cited by 657
(2010) · Cited by 470
Pleistocene Park: Return of the Mammoth's Ecosystem
Zimov, S. A. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1113442 · Cited by 235
Cited by
Assemblage thinking and actor‐network theory: conjunctions, disjunctions, cross‐fertilisations
Müller, M., & Schurr, C. (2016) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.12117 · Cited by 409
An interdisciplinary review of current and future approaches to improving human–predator relations
Pooley, S., Barua, M., Beinart, W., Dickman, A., Holmes, G., Lorimer, J., Loveridge, A. J., Macdonald, D. W., Marvin, G., Redpath, S., et al. (2017) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12859 · Cited by 277
Self-citationFraming the future of food: The contested promises of alternative proteins
Sexton, A. E., Garnett, T., & Lorimer, J. (2019) · Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/2514848619827009 · Cited by 257
Self-citationThe Anthropo-scene: A guide for the perplexed
Lorimer, J. (2017) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312716671039 · Cited by 223
Self-citationConnectivity modelling in conservation science: a comparative evaluation
Unnithan Kumar, S., & Cushman, S. A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20370-w · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorimer, J.
- Venue
- University of Minnesota Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Minnesota Press
- Published
- 2010-01-25
- OpenAlex
- W2343943587
- Cited by
- 624
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wildlife in the Anthropocene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5749/9781452944289
- The paper
- Lorimer, J. (2010). Wildlife in the Anthropocene. University of Minnesota Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5749/9781452944289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.