The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mutation Pressure and the Evolution of Organelle Genomic Architecture
Abstract
The nuclear genomes of multicellular animals and plants contain large amounts of noncoding DNA, the disadvantages of which can be too weak to be effectively countered by selection in lineages with reduced effective population sizes. In contrast, the organelle genomes of these two lineages evolved to opposite ends of the spectrum of genomic complexity, despite similar effective population sizes. This pattern and other puzzling aspects of organelle evolution appear to be consequences of differences in organelle mutation rates. These observations provide support for the hypothesis that the fundamental features of genome evolution are largely defined by the relative power of two nonadaptive forces: random genetic drift and mutation pressure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins of genome complexity
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089370 · Cited by 1,698
Self-citationRewiring the keyboard: evolvability of the genetic code
Knight, R. D., Freeland, S. J., & Landweber, L. F. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35047500 · Cited by 435
Cited by
A genome-wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast.
Lynch, M., Sung, W., Morris, K., Coffey, N., Landry, C. R., Dopman, E. B., Dickinson, W. J., Okamoto, K., Kulkarni, S., Hartl, D. L., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0803466105 · Cited by 708
Alverson, A. J., Wei, X., Rice, D. W., Stern, D. B., Barry, K., & Palmer, J. D. (2010) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msq029 · Cited by 631
Comprehensive DNA barcode coverage of North American birds
KERR, K. C. R., STOECKLE, M. Y., DOVE, C. J., WEIGT, L. A., FRANCIS, C. M., & HEBERT, P. D. N. (2007) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01670.x · Cited by 502
Skippington, E., Barkman, T. J., Rice, D. W., & Palmer, J. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1504491112 · Cited by 498
Mutation rate variation in multicellular eukaryotes: causes and consequences
Baer, C. F., Miyamoto, M. M., & Denver, D. R. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2158 · Cited by 461
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynch, M., Koskella, B., & Schaack, S.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2006-03-24
- Volume
- 311
- Issue
- 5768
- Pages
- 1727-1730
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2060157029
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutation Pressure and the Evolution of Organelle Genomic Architecture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1118884
- The paper
- Lynch, M., Koskella, B., & Schaack, S. (2006). Mutation Pressure and the Evolution of Organelle Genomic Architecture. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1118884
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.