The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coherent State Evolution in a Superconducting Qubit from Partial-Collapse Measurement
Open accessAbstract
Measurement is one of the fundamental building blocks of quantum-information processing systems. Partial measurement, where full wavefunction collapse is not the only outcome, provides a detailed test of the measurement process. We introduce quantum-state tomography in a superconducting qubit that exhibits high-fidelity single-shot measurement. For the two probabilistic outcomes of partial measurement, we find either a full collapse or a coherent yet nonunitary evolution of the state. This latter behavior explicitly confirms modern quantum-measurement theory and may prove important for error-correction algorithms in quantum computation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory
Shor, P. W. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.r2493 · Cited by 4,479
Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics
Wallraff, A., Schuster, D. I., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Huang, R. S., Majer, J., Kumar, S., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02851 · Cited by 3,796
Decoherence in Josephson Qubits from Dielectric Loss
Martinis, J. M., Cooper, K. B., McDermott, R., Steffen, M., Ansmann, M., Osborn, K. D., Cicak, K., Oh, S., Pappas, D. P., Simmonds, R. W., et al. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.210503 · Cited by 838
Self-citation
Cited by
Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits
You, J. Q., & Nori, F. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10122 · Cited by 1,311
Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics
Chan, A., Nandkishore, R. M., Pretko, M., & Smith, G. (2019) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.224307 · Cited by 474
Observing single quantum trajectories of a superconducting quantum bit
Murch, K. W., Weber, S. J., Macklin, C., & Siddiqi, I. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12539 · Cited by 405
To catch and reverse a quantum jump mid-flight
Minev, Z. K., Mundhada, S. O., Shankar, S., Reinhold, P., Gutiérrez-Jáuregui, R., Schoelkopf, R. J., Mirrahimi, M., Carmichael, H. J., & Devoret, M. H. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1287-z · Cited by 346
Entanglement in a fermion chain under continuous monitoring
Cao, X., Tilloy, A., & De Luca, A. (2019) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.7.2.024 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Katz, N., Ansmann, M., Bialczak, R. C., Lucero, E., McDermott, R., Neeley, M., Steffen, M., Weig, E. M., Cleland, A. N., Martinis, J. M., & Korotkov, A. N.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2006-06-09
- Volume
- 312
- Issue
- 5779
- Pages
- 1498-1500
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2165446084
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coherent State Evolution in a Superconducting Qubit from Partial-Collapse Measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1126475
- The paper
- Katz, N., Ansmann, M., Bialczak, R. C., Lucero, E., McDermott, R., Neeley, M., Steffen, M., Weig, E. M., Cleland, A. N., Martinis, J. M., & Korotkov, A. N. (2006). Coherent State Evolution in a Superconducting Qubit from Partial-Collapse Measurement. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1126475
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
