The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics
Open accessAbstract
Starting from a state of low quantum entanglement, local unitary time evolution increases the entanglement of a quantum many-body system. In contrast, local projective measurements disentangle degrees of freedom and decrease entanglement. We study the interplay of these competing tendencies by considering time evolution combining both unitary and projective dynamics. We begin by constructing a toy model of Bell pair dynamics which demonstrates that measurements can keep a system in a state of low, i.e., area-law, entanglement, in contrast with the volume-law entanglement produced by generic pure unitary time evolution. While the simplest Bell pair model has area-law entanglement for any measurement rate, as seen in certain noninteracting systems, we show that more generic models of entanglement can feature an area-to-volume law transition at a critical value of the measurement rate, in agreement with recent numerical investigations. As a concrete example of these ideas, we analytically investigate Clifford evolution in qubit systems which can exhibit an entanglement transition. We are able to identify stabilizer size distributions characterizing the area law, volume law, and critical ``fixed points.'' We also discuss a Floquet random unitary circuit, where the answers depend on the order of limits---one order of limits yields area-law entanglement for any nonzero measurement rate, whereas a different order of limits allows for an arealaw--volumelaw transition. Finally, we provide a rigorous argument that a system subjected to projective measurements can only exhibit a volume-law entanglement entropy if it also features a subleading correction term, which provides a universal signature of projective dynamics in the high-entanglement phase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory
Misra, B., & Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1977) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.523304 · Cited by 2,272
Operator Spreading in Random Unitary Circuits
Nahum, A., Vijay, S., & Haah, J. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021014 · Cited by 738
Quantum Zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition
Li, Y., Chen, X., & Fisher, M. P. A. (2018) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.205136 · Cited by 707
Quantum Entanglement Growth under Random Unitary Dynamics
Nahum, A., Ruhman, J., Vijay, S., & Haah, J. (2017) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.031016 · Cited by 680
Quantum Entanglement Growth under Random Unitary Dynamics
Nahum, A., Ruhman, Y., Vijay, S., & Haah, J. (2017) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 631
Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions in the Dynamics of Entanglement
Skinner, B. J., Ruhman, J., & Nahum, A. (2019) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 619
Measurement-driven entanglement transition in hybrid quantum circuits
Li, Y., Chen, X., & Fisher, M. P. A. (2019) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.134306 · Cited by 593
Operator Hydrodynamics, OTOCs, and Entanglement Growth in Systems without Conservation Laws
von Keyserlingk, C. W., Rakovszky, T., Pollmann, F., & Sondhi, S. L. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021013 · Cited by 585
Araki, H., & Lieb, E. H. (1970) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01646092 · Cited by 569
Khemani, V., Vishwanath, A., & Huse, D. A. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.031057 · Cited by 498
Cited by
Measurement as a Shortcut to Long-Range Entangled Quantum Matter
Lu, T.-C., Lessa, L. A., Kim, I. H., & Hsieh, T. H. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.040337 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, A., Nandkishore, R. M., Pretko, M., & Smith, G.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2019-06-24
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 22
- ISSN
- 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9969
- OpenAlex
- W2888053895
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 20.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.99.224307
- The paper
- Chan, A., Nandkishore, R. M., Pretko, M., & Smith, G. (2019). Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.99.224307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.