Cited by 246Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesIchthyology and Marine Biology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biomass, Size, and Trophic Status of Top Predators in the Pacific Ocean

Abstract

Fisheries have removed at least 50 million tons of tuna and other top-level predators from the Pacific Ocean pelagic ecosystem since 1950, leading to concerns about a catastrophic reduction in population biomass and the collapse of oceanic food chains. We analyzed all available data from Pacific tuna fisheries for 1950-2004 to provide comprehensive estimates of fishery impacts on population biomass and size structure. Current biomass ranges among species from 36 to 91% of the biomass predicted in the absence of fishing, a level consistent with or higher than standard fisheries management targets. Fish larger than 175 centimeters fork length have decreased from 5% to approximately 1% of the total population. The trophic level of the catch has decreased slightly, but there is no detectable decrease in the trophic level of the population. These results indicate substantial, though not catastrophic, impacts of fisheries on these top-level predators and minor impacts on the ecosystem in the Pacific Ocean.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1135347

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 10.1016/j.fishres.2006.06.022 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.fishres.2004.08.035 · DOI
  3. 10.1071/MF01246 · DOI
  4. M. Hinton, W. Bayliff, Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission Stock Assessment Report3, 328 (2002).
  5. W. Bayliff, Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission Stock Assessment Report2, 247 (2002).
  6. 10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.12.005 · DOI
  7. 10.1139/f06-039 · DOI
  8. 10.1139/f00-160 · DOI
  9. S. Hoyle, M. Maunder, Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission Stock Assessment Report6, 3 (2005).
  10. 10.5751/ES-00626-090110 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nature03581 · DOI
  12. G. Burgess et al., Fisheries30, 206 (2005).
  13. 10.1139/f03-152 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.0510964103 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89171-5 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.1059199 · DOI · Paper page
  18. M. Maunder, S. Harley, Bull. Mar. Sci.78, 593 (2006).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–193 of 193

Metadata

Authors
Sibert, J., Hampton, J., Kleiber, P., & Maunder, M.
Affiliations
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
Corresponding author
Sibert, John
Venue
Science
Published
2006-12-15
Volume
314
Issue
5806
Pages
1773-1776
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2109278119
Cited by
246
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
FWCI
17.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
Pacific tuna fisheries, top predators, population biomass, size structure, trophic levels, fisheries impacts, pelagic ecosystem
MeSH terms
Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fisheries, Pacific Ocean, Perciformes, Population Density, Population Dynamics, Predatory Behavior, Sharks, Tuna, Ecosystem, Biomass, Food Chain, Body Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review