Cited by 812Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesSoil and Environmental Studies

Used planet: a global history

Open access
Ellis, Erle C., Kaplan, Jed O., Fuller, Dorian Q., Vavrus, Steve, Klein Goldewijk, Kees, Verburg, Peter H.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Human use of land has transformed ecosystem pattern and process across most of the terrestrial biosphere, a global change often described as historically recent and potentially catastrophic for both humanity and the biosphere. Interdisciplinary paleoecological, archaeological, and historical studies challenge this view, indicating that land use has been extensive and sustained for millennia in some regions and that recent trends may represent as much a recovery as an acceleration. Here we synthesize recent scientific evidence and theory on the emergence, history, and future of land use as a process transforming the Earth System and use this to explain why relatively small human populations likely caused widespread and profound ecological changes more than 3,000 y ago, whereas the largest and wealthiest human populations in history are using less arable land per person every decade. Contrasting two spatially explicit global reconstructions of land-use history shows that reconstructions incorporating adaptive changes in land-use systems over time, including land-use intensification, offer a more spatially detailed and plausible assessment of our planet's history, with a biosphere and perhaps even climate long ago affected by humans. Although land-use processes are now shifting rapidly from historical patterns in both type and scale, integrative global land-use models that incorporate dynamic adaptations in human–environment relationships help to advance our understanding of both past and future land-use changes, including their sustainability and potential global effects.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Land use has extensively transformed the terrestrial biosphere for millennia, not just recently, and land-use intensification is a pivotal process in global change history. Comparing HYDE and KK10 shows that incorporating adaptive intensification yields much earlier and more widespread significant land use, with implications for climate, ecosystems, and future sustainability.

Key findings

  • HYDE assumes land use per capita remained approximately constant over time, closely resembling A.D. 1961 FAO patterns, and predicts that except for developed regions of Europe, human use of land was insignificant in every biome and region before A.D. 1750.
  • KK10 predicts land use from population data using empirically derived nonlinear relationships with population density; it indicates more than 20% of Earth’s Temperate Woodlands were already significantly used by 1000 B.C. and most other biomes by A.D. 1000.
  • Regionally, KK10 predicts 20% of Europe and Asia were already used significantly by 3000 B.C. and most other regions by A.D. 1000, whereas HYDE suggests no region outside Europe reached these levels before A.D. 1900.
  • Despite human populations exceeding seven billion and increasing per capita food demand, rates of growth in global extent and per capita use of land for agriculture seem to be declining; urbanization rose from approximately 7% in 1800, to 16% in 1900, to more than 50% today, while cities occupy less than 1% of Earth’s ice-free land.

Methods

  • Global land use and population datasets divided into five arc-minute grid cells (spatial resolution ∼85 km² at the equator) were obtained for the HYDE 3.1 and KK10 global land-use models.
  • These data were analyzed using a Geographic Information System to estimate global areas and populations within a simplified set of terrestrial biomes and world regions.
  • Maps depicting first significant land use were produced by overlaying cells with land-use areas >20% of land area at each time period, for all cells where A.D. 2000 land use was also >20%; recovery from peak land use was assessed as the difference between A.D. 2000 land use and the historical maximum percentage land use.

Limitations

  • The paper states that no single existing model of Holocene land use is able to make entirely accurate global predictions and that there are significant differences in land-use definitions: HYDE focuses exclusively on cultivated, pasture, and urban areas, while KK10 includes land use more generally, including shifting cultivation and forest harvest along with agricultural land use.
  • The paper states that archaeological and historical data are not currently available at levels necessary to quantify agricultural land-use intensification in specific regions and time periods, that the global history of land use cannot be assessed without a far more comprehensive, spatially detailed, quantitative, and accurate global assessment than has ever yet been attempted, and that the paleohistory of anthropogenic change across much of the Americas is especially unclear and controversial.
  • Evident in the text: the analysis compares only two global models and does not provide independent empirical validation of either; the paper also notes that the role of fire in preagricultural land-use change remains highly controversial.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1217241110

Cites

138 of 138 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 177 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation
    § Abstract

    KK10 indicates that large areas of Earth's land may now be recovering from higher levels of land use in earlier periods.

    “KK10 also indicates that large areas of Earth’s land may now be recovering from higher levels of land use in earlier periods (Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fig. 1

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingreasoning
    § Abstract

    Comparing spatially explicit land-use predictions from the two main global models of land use across the Holocene reveals the potentially pivotal role of land-use intensification as a global change process.

    “Comparing spatially explicit land-use predictions from the two main global models of land use across the Holocene reveals the potentially pivotal role of land-use intensification as a global change process (Figs. 1 and 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Figs. 1 and 2

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingreasoning
    § Abstract

    Existing archaeological evidence and global models together remain insufficient to conclusively determine the global extent of land use in different periods across the Holocene.

    “However, these two lines of evidence alone remain insufficient to conclusively determine the global extent of land use in different periods across the Holocene.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Human use of land causes major global changes in biodiversity, biogeochemistry, geomorphic processes, and climate.

    “Human populations and their use of land have now transformed ecosystem pattern and process across most of the terrestrial biosphere (1, 2), causing major global changes in biodiversity (3), biogeochemistry (4–6), geomorphic processes (7), and climate (8).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [3] Barnosky AD, et al. Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere. Nature. 2012;486(7401):52–58. doi: 10.1038/nature11018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] Kaplan JO, et al. Holocene carbon emissions as a result of anthropogenic land cover change. Holocene. 2011;21(5):775–791. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [5] Foley JA, et al. Global consequences of land use. Science. 2005;309(5734):570–574. doi: 10.1126/science.1111772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] Burney JA, Davis SJ, Lobell DB. Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(26):12052–12057. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914216107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [7] Syvitski JPM, Kettner A. Sediment flux and the Anthropocene. Phil Trans R Soc A. 2011;369(1938):957–975. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Human use of land has transformed ecosystem pattern and process across most of the terrestrial biosphere.

    “Human use of land has transformed ecosystem pattern and process across most of the terrestrial biosphere”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Ellis EC, Klein Goldewijk K, Siebert S, Lightman D, Ramankutty N. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2010;19(5):589–606. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [2] Kareiva P, Watts S, McDonald R, Boucher T. Domesticated nature: Shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare. Science. 2007;316(5833):1866–1869. doi: 10.1126/science.1140170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 46
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Abstract

    The strikingly different predictions of HYDE and KK10 are almost entirely the result of differences in the way they represent land-use intensification processes; their population datasets are nearly the same.

    “The strikingly different predictions of these two models (Figs. 1 and 2) are almost entirely the result of differences in the way they represent land-use intensification processes; their population datasets are nearly the same (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fig. 2

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation
    § Abstract

    HYDE predicts that except for the developed regions of Europe, human use of land was insignificant in every biome and region before A.D. 1750.

    “HYDE predicts that except for the developed regions of Europe, human use of land was insignificant in every biome and region before A.D. 1750 (Fig. 2 A and C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fig. 2 A and C

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation
    § Abstract

    HYDE suggests that no region outside Europe reached 20% significant use before A.D. 1900.

    “HYDE suggests that no region outside Europe reached these levels before A.D. 1900.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fig. 2D

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Abstract

    KK10 predicts that more than 20% of Earth's Temperate Woodlands were already significantly used by 1000 B.C. and most other biomes by A.D. 1000.

    “In KK10, land use emerges as a major global change far earlier in the Holocene, with more than 20% of Earth’s Temperate Woodlands already significantly used by 1000 B.C. and most other biomes by A.D. 1000 (Fig. 2B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fig. 2B

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Abstract

    KK10 predicts that 20% of Europe and Asia were already used significantly by 3000 B.C. and most other regions by A.D. 1000.

    “Regionally, KK10 predicts that 20% of Europe and Asia were already used significantly by 3000 B.C. and most other regions by A.D. 1000 (Fig. 2D)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fig. 2D

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Abstract

    Results from the first spatially explicit quantitative global land-use models over the course of the Holocene demonstrate that land-use intensification is a potentially pivotal process in both regulating the ecological impacts of human populations and in sustaining their global growth from the beginning of the Holocene to the present day.

    “Results from the first spatially explicit quantitative global land-use models over the course of the Holocene demonstrate that land-use intensification is a potentially pivotal process in both regulating the ecological impacts of human populations and in sustaining their global growth from the beginning of the Holocene to the present day.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Boserup's theory opposed the classic Malthusian claim that human populations were limited by agricultural productivity.

    “Boserup’s theory opposed the classic Malthusian claim that human populations were limited by agricultural productivity (36)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] Malthus TR. An Essay on the Principle of Population, as it Affects the Future Improvement of Society, with Remarks on the Speculations of Mr Godwin, M. Condorcet, and other writers. London: J. Johnson; 1798. pp. 3–143. [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Boserup's theory proposed that agriculturalists increased productivity only when population increases demanded this, because their objective was to invest the least amount of labor, technology, and other resources necessary to support their livelihoods, even when technological capacity for greater productivity was available.

    “proposing instead that agriculturalists increased productivity only when population increases demanded this, because their objective was to invest the least amount of labor, technology, and other resources necessary to support their livelihoods, even when the technological capacity for greater productivity was available (34, 37).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [34] Boserup E. The Conditions of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change under Population Pressure. London: Allen & Unwin; 1965. p. 124. [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [37] Boserup E. Population and Technological Change: A Study of Long Term Trends. Chicago: Univ of Chicago Press; 1981. p. 255. [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Abstract

    Global model intercomparisons reveal two very different Earth histories: one in which land use has recently accelerated, and one in which land use began early and became strikingly more efficient over time, leading to recoveries in some regions.

    “Overall, these global model intercomparisons reveal two very different Earth histories, one in which land use has recently accelerated, and one in which land use began early and became strikingly more efficient over time, leading to recoveries in some regions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract

    No single existing model of Holocene land use is able to make entirely accurate global predictions.

    “No single existing model of Holocene land use is able to make entirely accurate global predictions”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Abstract

    Hunter-gatherer's use of fire to enhance foraging success is a form of land-use intensification, as is land clearing for shifting cultivation, wet rice cultivation, the moldboard plow, and contemporary use of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer and mechanization.

    “By this model, hunter-gatherer’s use of fire to enhance foraging success is a form of land-use intensification, as is land clearing for shifting cultivation, wet rice cultivation, the moldboard plow, and contemporary use of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer and mechanization (44, 45).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [44] Grigg DB. The Agricultural Systems of the World: An Evolutionary Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press; 1974. p. 358. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [45] Netting RM. Smallholders, Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive Sustainable Agriculture. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ Press; 1993. p. 416. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Rates of growth in the global extent and per capita use of land for agriculture seem to be declining even as human populations increase beyond seven billion and per capita demand for food is increasing.

    “Even as human populations increase beyond seven billion and per capita demand for food is increasing, rates of growth in the global extent and per capita use of land for agriculture seem to be declining (22).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Foley JA, et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 2011;478(7369):337–342. doi: 10.1038/nature10452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Abstract

    A general trend toward increasing productivity with population density is attained not as a smooth and continuous process but through a complex succession of land system regime shifts, some of them regressive, with populations and their production systems subject to both surplus production and productivity crises.

    “As a result, a general trend toward increasing productivity with population density is attained not as a smooth and continuous process but through a complex succession of land system regime shifts, some of them regressive, with populations and their production systems subject to both surplus production and productivity crises, as depicted in Fig. 3.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fig. 3

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Boserup's theory inspired a wide array of intensification theories across archaeology, anthropology, geography, development studies, economics, environmental history, and other disciplines and has been extended to include land tenure, social institutions, market forces, and nonagricultural populations.

    “Boserup’s theory inspired a wide array of intensification theories across archaeology (14), anthropology (38), geography (39), development studies (40), economics, environmental history, and other disciplines and has been extended to include land tenure and other social institutions, market forces, and nonagricultural populations (39, 41, 42).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [14] Kirch PV. Archaeology and global change: The holocene record. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2005;30(1):409. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [38] Hamilton MJ, Milne BT, Walker RS, Brown JH. Nonlinear scaling of space use in human hunter-gatherers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(11):4765–4769. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611197104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [39] Turner BL, 2nd, Ali AMS. Induced intensification: agricultural change in Bangladesh with implications for Malthus and Boserup. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93(25):14984–14991. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Early anthropogenic changes have long-term impacts including forest clearing, increased fire frequencies, megafaunal extinctions, species invasions, and soil erosion.

    “with long-term impacts from forest clearing, increased fire frequencies, megafaunal extinctions, species invasions, soil erosion, and others (13, 14)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [13] Redman CL. Human Impact on Ancient Environments. Tucson, AZ: Univ of Arizona Press; 1999. p. 239. [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [14] Kirch PV. Archaeology and global change: The holocene record. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2005;30(1):409. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Intentional burning could have had very large effects on vegetation cover in the mesic environments of New Zealand, the wet tropical forests of the pre-Columbian Amazon, and across the savannas and woodlands of Africa.

    “Studies have suggested that intentional burning could have had very large effects on vegetation cover in the mesic environments of New Zealand (49), the wet tropical forests of the pre-Columbian Amazon (50), and across the savannas and woodlands of Africa (51).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [49] McWethy DB, et al. Rapid landscape transformation in South Island, New Zealand, following initial Polynesian settlement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(50):21343–21348. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011801107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [50] Nevle RJ, Bird DK, Ruddiman WF, Dull RA. Neotropical human–landscape interactions, fire, and atmospheric CO2 during European conquest. Holocene. 2011;21(5):853–864. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [51] Archibald S, Staver AC, Levin SA. Evolution of human-driven fire regimes in Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(3):847–852. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118648109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    There are significant differences in the land-use definitions of different models, with HYDE focusing exclusively on cultivated, pasture, and urban areas, and KK10 on land use more generally, including shifting cultivation and forest harvest along with agricultural land use.

    “there are significant differences in the land-use definitions of different models, with HYDE focusing exclusively on cultivated, pasture, and urban areas, and KK10 on land use more generally, including shifting cultivation and forest harvest along with agricultural land use.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [31] Klein Goldewijk K, Beusen A, van Drecht G, de Vos M. The HYDE 3.1 spatially explicit database of human induced global land use change over the past 12,000 years. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2011;20(1):73–86. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] Kaplan JO, et al. Holocene carbon emissions as a result of anthropogenic land cover change. Holocene. 2011;21(5):775–791. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Most continental to global reviews of the Holocene sedimentary charcoal record have concluded that fire activity is most strongly correlated with climate variability and suggest that anthropogenic burning had only local effects on land cover.

    “Most continental to global reviews of the Holocene sedimentary charcoal record have concluded that fire activity is most strongly correlated with climate variability and suggest that anthropogenic burning had only local effects on land cover (52, 53).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [52] Power M, et al. Changes in fire regimes since the Last Glacial Maximum: An assessment based on a global synthesis and analysis of charcoal data. Clim Dyn. 2008;30(7):887–907. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [53] Marlon JR, et al. Climate and human influences on global biomass burning over the past two millennia. Nat Geosci. 2008;1(10):697–702. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    In Southwest Asia by 7000 B.C. and Europe by 5000 B.C., the early presence of intensive land-use technologies has been confirmed by stable nitrogen isotope ratios in preserved crop grains, indicating that manures were used to sustain intensive cultivation near settlements.

    “In Southwest Asia (by 7000 B.C.) and Europe (by 5000 B.C.), the early presence of intensive land-use technologies has been confirmed by stable nitrogen isotope ratios in preserved crop grains, indicating that manures were used to sustain intensive cultivation near settlements (90, 91).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [90] Bogaard A, Heaton THE, Poulton P, Merbach I. The impact of manuring on nitrogen isotope ratios in cereals: Archaeological implications for reconstruction of diet and crop management practices. J Archaeol Sci. 2007;34(3):335–343. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [91] Bogaard A. ‘Garden Agriculture’ and the nature of early farming in Europe and the near East. World Archaeol. 2005;37(2):177–196. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Some pathways led from sedentary hunter-gatherers to early farmers, as in Southwest Asia or Yangtze China; others shifted from mobile hunting to the addition of herding first, for example in Africa, or from mobile hunting and gathering to mobile forms of agriculture like shifting cultivation, as in India, New Guinea, or South America.

    “Although some pathways led from sedentary hunter-gatherers to early farmers, as in Southwest Asia or Yangtze China (68), others shifted from mobile hunting to the addition of herding first, for example in Africa (70), or from mobile hunting and gathering to mobile forms of agriculture like shifting cultivation, as in India (75), New Guinea (76), or South America (77).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [68] Fuller D, Qin L. Declining oaks, increasing artistry, and cultivating rice: The environmental and social context of the emergence of farming in the Lower Yangtze Region. Environ Archaeol. 2010;15(2):139–159. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [70] Marshall F, Hildebrand E. Cattle before crops: The beginnings of food production in Africa. J World Prehist. 2002;16(2):99–143. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [75] Kingwell-Banham E, Fuller DQ. Shifting cultivators in South Asia: Expansion, marginalisation and specialisation over the long term. Quat Int. 2012;249:84–95. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Abstract

    As populations gradually increased, more intensive land-use practices were adopted to sustain them (intensification), or populations migrated to areas with lower levels of land use (extensification), including uninhabited wildlands.

    “As populations gradually increased, more intensive land-use practices were adopted to sustain them (intensification), or populations migrated to areas with lower levels of land use (extensification), including uninhabited wildlands.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Once settled into new environments, human populations grew to levels unprecedented by earlier Hominins, putting pressure on plant and animal resources that ultimately led to expanding human procurement of increasingly smaller and harder to catch prey, in an adaptive transition dubbed the "broad spectrum revolution."

    “Once settled into new environments, human populations grew to levels unprecedented by earlier Hominins, putting pressure on plant and animal resources that ultimately led to expanding human procurement of increasingly smaller and harder to catch prey, in an adaptive transition that archaeologists have dubbed the “broad spectrum revolution” (57).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] Stiner MC. Thirty years on the “broad spectrum revolution” and paleolithic demography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(13):6993–6996. doi: 10.1073/pnas.121176198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Abstract

    Existing archaeological and historical evidence seems to support induced intensification theory in general, but data are not currently available at the levels necessary to quantify the status of agricultural land-use intensification in specific regions and time periods across the Holocene.

    “Although existing archaeological and historical evidence seems to support this theory in general, data are not currently available at the levels necessary to quantify the status of agricultural land-use intensification in specific regions and time periods across the Holocene.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Evidence is clear that agricultural human populations had spread across most continents by the mid-Holocene, leading to the clearing of native vegetation and herbivores, their replacement with domesticates, and the increasingly intensive application of techniques and inputs to enhance the productivity of land as populations became denser.

    “Nevertheless, the evidence is clear that agricultural human populations had spread across most continents by the mid-Holocene, leading to the clearing of native vegetation and herbivores, their replacement with domesticates, and the increasingly intensive application of techniques and inputs to enhance the productivity of land as populations became denser (44, 61).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [44] Grigg DB. The Agricultural Systems of the World: An Evolutionary Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press; 1974. p. 358. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [61] Smith BD. Behavior. The ultimate ecosystem engineers. Science. 2007;315(5820):1797–1798. doi: 10.1126/science.1137740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    These processing techniques may have boosted nutritional returns on foraging efforts for small seeds and tubers to levels that made them worth exploiting at high levels for the first time, potentially setting them on course to later domestication.

    “These techniques may have boosted the nutritional returns on foraging efforts for small seeds and tubers to levels that made them worth exploiting at high levels for the first time (59), thereby potentially setting them on course to later domestication (60).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [59] Wollstonecroft M. Investigating the role of food processing in human evolution: A niche construction approach. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences. 2011;3(1):141–150. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [60] Fuller DQ, Willcox G, Allaby RG. Cultivation and domestication had multiple origins: Arguments against the core area hypothesis for the origins of agriculture in the Near East. World Archaeol. 2011;43(4):628–652. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Processing techniques such as grinding, boiling, fermenting, and roasting were gradually adopted to enhance nutrient bioavailability from plant and animal foods, further increasing the amount of food extractable from a given area of land.

    “Processing techniques such as grinding, boiling, fermenting, and roasting were gradually adopted to enhance nutrient bioavailability from plant and animal foods, further increasing the amount of food extractable from a given area of land (59).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [59] Wollstonecroft M. Investigating the role of food processing in human evolution: A niche construction approach. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences. 2011;3(1):141–150. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    As rice agriculture gradually spread southward and westward, reaching Thailand and northern India by 2000 B.C., less intensive rainfed and naturally inundated systems were first used, followed much later by more intensive systems.

    “Similarly, as rice agriculture gradually spread southward and westward, reaching Thailand and northern India by 2000 B.C., less intensive rainfed and naturally inundated systems were first used (72), followed much later by more intensive systems (44).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [72] Castillo C. Rice in Thailand: The archaeobotanical contribution. Rice. 2011;4(3):114–120. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [44] Grigg DB. The Agricultural Systems of the World: An Evolutionary Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press; 1974. p. 358. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Abstract

    By the early Holocene, hunter-gatherer populations had spread across the Earth and depended on early land-use intensification processes to survive and to grow and lived mostly within ecosystems reshaped by their ancestors to enhance their productivity.

    “By the early Holocene, hunter-gatherer populations had spread across the Earth and depended on early land-use intensification processes to survive and to grow and lived mostly within ecosystems reshaped by their ancestors to enhance their productivity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Some agricultural systems developed at the Pleistocene-Holocene transition, including Southwest Asia, South America, and North China, whereas others took place closer to 6,000-7,000 y ago, such as Yangtze China and perhaps central America.

    “Some developed at the Pleistocene–Holocene transition, including Southwest Asia (60, 64), South America (65, 66), and North China (67), whereas others took place closer to 6,000–7,000 y ago, such as Yangtze China (68) and perhaps central America (cf. 69).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [60] Fuller DQ, Willcox G, Allaby RG. Cultivation and domestication had multiple origins: Arguments against the core area hypothesis for the origins of agriculture in the Near East. World Archaeol. 2011;43(4):628–652. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [64] Goring-Morris AN, Belfer-Cohen A. Neolithization processes in the Levant. Curr Anthropol. 2011;52(S4):S000. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [65] Dillehay TD, Rossen J, Andres TC, Williams DE. Preceramic adoption of peanut, squash, and cotton in northern Peru. Science. 2007;316(5833):1890–1893. doi: 10.1126/science.1141395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    The rise and dispersal of agricultural populations across Earth's land was likely driven by increasing rates of population growth sustained by early agricultural economies, which likely enabled them to dominate Earth's most productive landscapes, where increasingly intensive agricultural systems became established in most regions of the world, despite the periodic collapse of individual societies.

    “The rise and dispersal of agricultural populations across Earth’s land was likely driven by increasing rates of population growth sustained by early agricultural economies (93–95), which likely enabled them to dominate Earth’s most productive landscapes, where increasingly intensive agricultural systems became established in most regions of the world, despite the periodic collapse of individual”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [93] Bellwood PS. The First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2004. p. 384. [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [94] Gignoux CR, Henn BM, Mountain JL. Rapid, global demographic expansions after the origins of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(15):6044–6049. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914274108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [95] Bocquet-Appel J-P. The agricultural demographic transition during and after the agriculture inventions. Curr Anthropol. 2011;52(S4):S497–S510. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [96] Butzer KW, Endfield GH. Critical perspectives on historical collapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(10):3628–3631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114772109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    In China, historical evidence supports a long and gradual history of extensification and later intensification of rice production, even though advanced technologies were available early.

    “In China, historical evidence supports a long and gradual history of extensification and later intensification of rice production, even though advanced technologies were available early (92).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [92] Ellis EC, Wang SM. Sustainable traditional agriculture in the Tai Lake Region of China. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 1997;61(2-3):177–193. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Widespread agricultural land use by the mid-Holocene is evidenced by altered fire regimes that may have transformed vegetation structure and species composition across many regions, with woodland ecosystems from the Mediterranean to the Tropics increasingly recognized as bio-cultural legacies of long histories of prior human use.

    “Widespread agricultural land use by mid-Holocene is further evidenced by altered fire regimes that may have transformed vegetation structure and species composition across many regions, with woodland ecosystems from the Mediterranean to the Tropics increasingly recognized as the bio-cultural legacies of long histories of prior human use (50, 74, 78–84).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 9 sources checked
    • cites [50] Nevle RJ, Bird DK, Ruddiman WF, Dull RA. Neotropical human–landscape interactions, fire, and atmospheric CO2 during European conquest. Holocene. 2011;21(5):853–864. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [74] Munoz SE, Gajewski K. Distinguishing prehistoric human influence on late-Holocene forests in southern Ontario, Canada. Holocene. 2010;20(6):967–981. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [78] Fairhead J, Leach M. Misreading the African Landscape: Society and Ecology in a Forest-Savanna Mosaic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press; 1996. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [79] Grove AT, Rackham O. The Nature of Mediterranean Europe: An Ecological History. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ Press; 2003. p. 384. [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [80] Politis G. Nukak: Ethnoarchaeology of an Amazonian People. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2009. p. 412. [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [81] Asouti E, Fuller DQ. Trees and Woodlands of South India: Archaeological Perspectives. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2008. p. 343. [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [82] Cronon W. Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England. New York: Hill and Wang; 1983. p. 235. [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [83] Foster D, et al. The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. Bioscience. 2003;53(1):77–88. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [84] Foster DR, Motzkin G, Slater B. Land-use history as long-term broad-scale disturbance: Regional forest dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems (N Y) 1998;1(1):96–119. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract

    Preagricultural technologies for ecosystem engineering have far lower productivities than the agricultural technologies that came later, but they still enabled human populations to grow beyond the capabilities of unaltered ecosystems to support them.

    “Although preagricultural technologies for ecosystem engineering have far lower productivities than the agricultural technologies that came later, they still enabled human populations to grow beyond the capabilities of unaltered ecosystems to support them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Agricultural yields within the most densely populated and productive preindustrial land-use systems compared well with modern yields and were sustained in some regions for centuries to millennia, even though they also tended to require extreme inputs of labor and other socially unsustainable hardships.

    “Agricultural yields within the most densely populated and productive preindustrial land-use systems compared well with modern yields and were sustained in some regions for centuries to millennia, even though they also tended to require extreme inputs of labor and other socially unsustainable hardships (43–45, 92).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [43] Geertz C. Agricultural Involution: The Process of Ecological Change in Indonesia. Berkeley, CA: Univ of California Press; 1963. p. 176. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [44] Grigg DB. The Agricultural Systems of the World: An Evolutionary Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press; 1974. p. 358. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [45] Netting RM. Smallholders, Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive Sustainable Agriculture. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ Press; 1993. p. 416. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [92] Ellis EC, Wang SM. Sustainable traditional agriculture in the Tai Lake Region of China. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 1997;61(2-3):177–193. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Abstract

    Most simulation studies are based on a narrow set of land cover reconstructions over at most one millennium and do not incorporate the effects of land use and its intensification across the Holocene.

    “However, most simulation studies are based on a narrow set of land cover reconstructions over at most one millennium and do not incorporate the effects of land use and its intensification across the Holocene.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Industrial technologies, especially mechanization, have largely decoupled human labor from productivity increases, enabling an unprecedented proportion of human populations to live within cities, which even today occupy less than 1% of Earth's ice-free land.

    “Industrial technologies, especially mechanization, have also largely decoupled human labor from productivity increases, enabling an unprecedented proportion of human populations to live within cities, which even today occupy less than 1% of Earth’s ice-free land (19).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Klein Goldewijk K, Beusen A, Janssen P. Long-term dynamic modeling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way: HYDE 3.1. Holocene. 2010;20(4):565–573. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    The scale and rate of urbanization over the past two centuries is unprecedented, with the percentage of human populations living in cities growing from approximately 7% in 1800, to 16% in 1900, to more than 50% today.

    “Still, the scale and rate of urbanization over the past two centuries is unprecedented, with the percentage of human populations living in cities growing from approximately 7% in 1800, to 16% in 1900, to more than 50% today (19).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Klein Goldewijk K, Beusen A, Janssen P. Long-term dynamic modeling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way: HYDE 3.1. Holocene. 2010;20(4):565–573. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Abstract

    The rise of intensive industrial land-use systems fits well within the general definition of land-use intensification, with increasing human population densities, concentrated within urban settlements, driving ever increasing productivity per unit area of land.

    “Despite their unprecedented scale, sophistication, and productive capacity, the rise of intensive industrial land-use systems fits well within our general definition of land-use intensification (Fig. 3), with increasing human population densities, concentrated within urban settlements in this case, driving ever increasing productivity per unit area of land.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fig. 3

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    The first urban populations dependent on trade for their sustenance emerged as early as 4000 B.C. in the Near East and became common across the Indus Valley, Egypt, and China by 1500 B.C., with major cities (populations >100,000) developing by 2000 y ago in the Near East, Europe, and Asia.

    “The first urban populations dependent on trade for their sustenance emerged as early as 4000 B.C. in the Near East and became common across the Indus Valley, Egypt, and China by 1500 B.C. (97), with major cities (populations >100,000) developing by 2000 y ago in the Near East, Europe, and Asia (14).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [97] Tellier LN. Urban World History: An Economic and Geographical Perspective. Quebec City: Presses de l'Université du Québec; 2009. p. 629. [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [14] Kirch PV. Archaeology and global change: The holocene record. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2005;30(1):409. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Vegetation cover changes caused by land use can alter regional and global climate through both biogeochemical and biogeophysical feedbacks with the atmosphere, with reverse effects following land abandonment, reforestation, and other vegetation recoveries.

    “Vegetation cover changes caused by land use can alter regional and global climate through both biogeochemical (emissions of greenhouse gases and aerosols) and biogeophysical (albedo, evapotranspiration, and surface roughness) feedbacks with the atmosphere, with reverse effects following land abandonment, reforestation, and other vegetation recoveries (107).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [107] Bounoua L, DeFries R, Collatz GJ, Sellers P, Khan H. Effects of land cover conversion on surface climate. Clim Change. 2002;52(1-2):29–64. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    The massive food and resource demands of large, wealthy, and growing urban populations require high levels of agricultural surplus production and trade, which tend to be met by increasingly intensive and productive agricultural systems concentrated in Earth's most productive agricultural lands, supported by ever larger scales of farming operations, trading systems, and technological institutions.

    “The massive food and resource demands of large, wealthy, and growing urban populations require high levels of agricultural surplus production and trade, which tend to be met by increasingly intensive and productive agricultural systems concentrated in Earth’s most productive agricultural lands, supported by ever larger scales of farming operations, trading systems, and technological institutions (”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [44] Grigg DB. The Agricultural Systems of the World: An Evolutionary Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press; 1974. p. 358. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [102] Lambin EF, et al. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Change. 2001;11(4):261–269. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    As agriculture continues to intensify and migration to cities depopulates rural landscapes, lands less suited to industrial-scale production are being abandoned in some regions, enabling large-scale forest recoveries, especially where governance systems support this.

    “As agriculture continues to intensify and migration to cities depopulates rural landscapes, lands less suited to industrial-scale production are being abandoned in some regions, enabling large-scale forest recoveries, especially where governance systems support this (84, 105, 106).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [84] Foster DR, Motzkin G, Slater B. Land-use history as long-term broad-scale disturbance: Regional forest dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems (N Y) 1998;1(1):96–119. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [105] Rudel TK, et al. Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970-2005. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(49):20675–20680. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812540106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [106] Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF. Global forest transition: Prospects for an end to deforestation. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2011;36(1):343–371. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Modeled regional and global climate responses to simulated and reconstructed historical land cover changes over the past century and millennium generally agree that anthropogenic deforestation drives biogeophysical cooling at higher latitudes and warming in low latitudes and suggest that biogeochemical impacts tend to exceed biogeophysical effects.

    “Modeled regional and global climate responses to simulated (107, 110, 111) and reconstructed historical land cover changes over the past century (112) and millennium (113) generally agree that anthropogenic deforestation drives biogeophysical cooling at higher latitudes and warming in low latitudes and suggest that biogeochemical impacts tend to exceed biogeophysical effects (113).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [107] Bounoua L, DeFries R, Collatz GJ, Sellers P, Khan H. Effects of land cover conversion on surface climate. Clim Change. 2002;52(1-2):29–64. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [110] Bala G, et al. Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(16):6550–6555. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608998104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [111] Davin EL, de Noblet-Ducoudré N. Climatic impact of global-scale deforestation: Radiative versus nonradiative processes. J Clim. 2010;23(1):97–112. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation
    § Abstract

    To be effective in conserving ecosystems and biodiversity altered by millennia of human interaction, ecological science and conservation will need to go beyond the view of humans as a recent disturbance and incorporate a solid theoretical and historical understanding of the dynamics of human populations and land-use systems and their role in shaping ecosystems over the long term.

    “To be effective in conserving ecosystems and biodiversity altered by millennia of human interaction, ecological science and conservation will need to go beyond the view of humans as a recent disturbance and incorporate a solid theoretical and historical understanding of the dynamics of human populations and land-use systems and their role in shaping ecosystems over the long term (83, 115, 118).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [83] Foster D, et al. The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. Bioscience. 2003;53(1):77–88. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [115] Ellis EC. Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Proc R Soc A. 2011;369(1938):1010–1035. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [118] Hobbs RJ, Hallett LM, Ehrlich PR, Mooney HA. Intervention ecology: Applying ecological science in the twenty-first century. Bioscience. 2011;61(6):442–450. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Increased fire frequencies are associated with low human population densities, and fire suppression with higher population densities.

    “increased fire frequencies are associated with low human population densities and fire suppression with higher population densities (117)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [117] Bowman DMJS, et al. Fire in the Earth system. Science. 2009;324(5926):481–484. doi: 10.1126/science.1163886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Concentrating human populations within cities transforms the economies of scale in human interactions, producing higher average incomes and enabling a wide array of novel social benefits as urban systems advance, which in turn enable further growth and help to drive rural-urban migration.

    “Concentrating human populations within cities transforms the economies of scale in human interactions, producing higher average incomes and enabling a wide array of novel social benefits as urban systems advance (98, 99), which in turn enable further growth and help to drive rural–urban migration (100, 101).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [98] Bettencourt LMA, Lobo J, Helbing D, Kühnert C, West GB. Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(17):7301–7306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610172104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [99] Glaeser E. Cities, productivity, and quality of life. Science. 2011;333(6042):592–594. doi: 10.1126/science.1209264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [100] Dethier J-J, Effenberger A. Agriculture and development: A brief review of the literature. Econ Syst. 2012;36(2):175–205. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Combustion processes often leave signs of land use and related human activities, including enhanced fire rates and forest clearing and the preindustrial use of harvested biomass for fuel.

    “Combustion processes often leave signs of land use and related human activities, including enhanced fire rates and forest clearing (122) and the preindustrial use of harvested biomass for fuel (53, 117).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [122] Clark JD, Harris JWK. Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways. Afr Archaeol Rev. 1985;3(1):3–27. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [53] Marlon JR, et al. Climate and human influences on global biomass burning over the past two millennia. Nat Geosci. 2008;1(10):697–702. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [117] Bowman DMJS, et al. Fire in the Earth system. Science. 2009;324(5926):481–484. doi: 10.1126/science.1163886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Although projected increases in greenhouse gas concentrations caused by fossil fuel combustion are expected to dominate 21st century climate change, some studies suggest that anthropogenic land use may yet be at least as important and may remain so in the near future.

    “Although projected increases in greenhouse gas concentrations caused by fossil fuel combustion are expected to dominate 21st century climate change, some studies suggest that anthropogenic land use may yet be at least as important and may remain so in the near future (8).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Feddema JJ, et al. The importance of land-cover change in simulating future climates. Science. 2005;310(5754):1674–1678. doi: 10.1126/science.1118160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Methods

    Maps depicting first significant land use were produced by overlaying maps of cells with land-use areas greater than 20% of land area within each cell at each time period, for all cells where A.D. 2000 land use was also greater than 20% of land area in each cell.

    “Maps depicting first significant land use were produced by overlaying maps of cells with land-use areas >20% of land area within each cell at each time period (20% criteria for significant land use as per refs. 1 and 115), for all cells where A.D. 2000 land use was also >20% of land area in each cell (earliest at the top; Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Ellis EC, Klein Goldewijk K, Siebert S, Lightman D, Ramankutty N. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2010;19(5):589–606. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [115] Ellis EC. Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Proc R Soc A. 2011;369(1938):1010–1035. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Abstract

    If land-use intensification was gradual across the Holocene, historical modeling results reveal an Earth significantly transformed by land use by 1000 B.C., with significant areas on nearly every continent now in recovery from past historical peaks of land use.

    “If, as suggested by intensification theory and archaeological data, land-use intensification was gradual across the Holocene, the results of historical modeling reveal an Earth significantly transformed by land use by 1000 B.C., with significant areas on nearly every continent now in recovery from past historical peaks of land use (Fig. 1B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Abstract

    Standardized global sets of local historical land use and population reconstructions might ultimately enable strong empirical testing of the global importance and historical dynamics of land use as a force transforming the terrestrial biosphere across the Holocene.

    “Although the scale of these efforts would require unprecedented levels of support, standardized global sets of local historical land use and population reconstructions might ultimately enable strong empirical testing of the global importance and historical dynamics of land use as a force transforming the terrestrial biosphere across the Holocene.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Global market integration has increased connectivity between world regions, with regions having the highest demand for land resources often experiencing agricultural abandonment and reforestation while displacing their production needs to less developed regions.

    “Global market integration has increased connectivity between world regions, with regions having the highest demand for land resources often experiencing agricultural abandonment and reforestation while displacing their production needs to less developed regions (127), mirroring patterns from the colonial era.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [127] Meyfroidt P, Rudel TK, Lambin EF. Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(49):20917–20922. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014773107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Abstract

    If land use per capita has been fairly constant across the Holocene, early land use was mostly localized and globally insignificant and accelerated greatly only in recent centuries.

    “Alternatively, if land use per capita has been fairly constant across the Holocene, early land use was mostly localized and globally insignificant and accelerated greatly only in recent centuries (Fig. 1A).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Methods

    Recovery from peak land use in each cell was assessed as the difference between A.D. 2000 land use and the historical maximum percentage land use.

    “These maps were then overlaid on maps depicting recovery from peak land use in each cell, assessed as the difference between A.D. 2000 land use and the historical maximum percentage land use (Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Methods

    The data were analyzed using a Geographic Information System to estimate global areas and populations within a simplified set of terrestrial biomes and world regions.

    “These data were analyzed using a Geographic Information System to estimate global areas and populations within a simplified set of terrestrial biomes (aggregated from the potential vegetation classes of ref. 28) and world regions (after ref. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [28] Ramankutty N, Foley JA. Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 1999;13(4):997–1027. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [1] Ellis EC, Klein Goldewijk K, Siebert S, Lightman D, Ramankutty N. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2010;19(5):589–606. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Abstract

    The paleohistory of anthropogenic change across much of the Americas is especially unclear and controversial and may be exceptional compared with other continents.

    “The paleohistory of anthropogenic change across much of the Americas is especially unclear and controversial (e.g., refs. 74, 82, and 125) and may be exceptional compared with other continents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [74] Munoz SE, Gajewski K. Distinguishing prehistoric human influence on late-Holocene forests in southern Ontario, Canada. Holocene. 2010;20(6):967–981. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [82] Cronon W. Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England. New York: Hill and Wang; 1983. p. 235. [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [125] Bush MB, Silman MR. Amazonian exploitation revisited: Ecological asymmetry and the policy pendulum. Front Ecol Environ. 2007;5(9):457–465. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract

    The evidence from archaeology and environmental history points toward the view that land-use intensification was gradual across the Holocene.

    “Although the evidence from archaeology and environmental history point toward the former view of land-use history, available data remain far from adequate to quantify the global significance of land use and intensification processes over the long term.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    There remain a wide array of societal challenges in adapting land systems to meet growing demands.

    “there remain a wide array of societal challenges in adapting land systems to meet growing demands (104).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [104] Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(50):20260–20264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116437108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Methods

    Global land use and population datasets divided into five arc minute grid cells (spatial resolution approximately 85 km2 at the equator) were obtained for the HYDE 3.1 and KK10 global land-use models.

    “Global land use and population datasets divided into five arc minute grid cells (spatial resolution ∼85 km2 at the equator) were obtained for the HYDE 3.1 (19, 31) and KK10 (4) global land-use models.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [19] Klein Goldewijk K, Beusen A, Janssen P. Long-term dynamic modeling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way: HYDE 3.1. Holocene. 2010;20(4):565–573. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [31] Klein Goldewijk K, Beusen A, van Drecht G, de Vos M. The HYDE 3.1 spatially explicit database of human induced global land use change over the past 12,000 years. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2011;20(1):73–86. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] Kaplan JO, et al. Holocene carbon emissions as a result of anthropogenic land cover change. Holocene. 2011;21(5):775–791. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

59 of 59
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Land-use intensification theory and archaeological data suggest that land-use intensification was gradual across the Holocene.

    “If, as suggested by intensification theory and archaeological data, land-use intensification was gradual across the Holocene, the results of historical modeling reveal an Earth significantly transformed by land use by 1000 B.C.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Land use per capita has been fairly constant across the Holocene.

    “Alternatively, if land use per capita has been fairly constant across the Holocene, early land use was mostly localized and globally insignificant and accelerated greatly only in recent centuries (Fig. 1A).”
2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 145 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. CL Redman Human Impact on Ancient Environments (Univ of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ), pp. 239 (1999).
  2. KM Krumhardt ARVE Technical Report #3: Methodology for Worldwide Population Estimates: 1000 BC to 1850. (ARVE Group, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2010).
  3. RW Kates, G Hydén, BL Turner Theory, Evidence, Study Design. Population Growth and Agricultural Change in Africa, Carter Lecture Series, , eds Turner, II BL, Hydén G, Kates RW (Univ Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL), pp 1–40. (1993).
  4. ; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Arable Land per Capita (FAOSTAT Online, FAO Statistical Databases) (FAO, Rome, 2012).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellis, E. C., Kaplan, J. O., Fuller, D. Q., Vavrus, S., Klein Goldewijk, K., & Verburg, P. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), 3720 AH Bilthoven and Utrecht University (UU), 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-04-29
Volume
110
Issue
20
Pages
7978-7985
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2051997212
Cited by
812
References
145
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 16
FWCI
46.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/G005540/1, NE/K003402/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
Keywords
land use history, human impact on ecosystems, land use intensification, human-environment relationship, paleoecology, global change
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Climate, Conservation of Natural Resources, Ecology, Geography, Humans, Ecosystem, Earth, Planet, History, Ancient, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review