Cited by 1,630Polymer Nanocomposites and PropertiesClay minerals and soil interactionsCarbon Nanotubes in Composites

Ultrastrong and Stiff Layered Polymer Nanocomposites

Podsiadlo, Paul, Kaushik, Amit K., Arruda, Ellen M., Waas, Anthony M., Shim, Bong Sup, Xu, Jiadi, Nandivada, Himabindu, Pumplin, Benjamin G. +3 more·2007·Science

Abstract

Nanoscale building blocks are individually exceptionally strong because they are close to ideal, defect-free materials. It is, however, difficult to retain the ideal properties in macroscale composites. Bottom-up assembly of a clay/polymer nanocomposite allowed for the preparation of a homogeneous, optically transparent material with planar orientation of the alumosilicate nanosheets. The stiffness and tensile strength of these multilayer composites are one order of magnitude greater than those of analogous nanocomposites at a processing temperature that is much lower than those of ceramic or polymer materials with similar characteristics. A high level of ordering of the nanoscale building blocks, combined with dense covalent and hydrogen bonding and stiffening of the polymer chains, leads to highly effective load transfer between nanosheets and the polymer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1143176

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High volume fraction reinforcement composites using layer-by-layer and freeze-casting techniques have strengths of hundreds of MPa, an order of magnitude lower than limpet tooth strength.

    “Additional comparisons could be made by consideration of high volume fraction reinforcement composites using layer-by-layer [31,32] and freeze-casting techniques [33,34]. In these cases, the composite material strengths are hundreds of MPa, highlighting the order of magnitude enhancement in tensile strength and general extreme mechanical performance of the limpet tooth samples.”

    From Extreme strength observed in limpet teeth (2015) · cites this paper as [31]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Podsiadlo, P., Kaushik, A. K., Arruda, E. M., Waas, A. M., Shim, B. S., Xu, J., Nandivada, H., Pumplin, B. G., Lahann, J., Ramamoorthy, A., & Kotov, N. A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Kotov, Nicholas A.
Venue
Science
Published
2007-10-05
Volume
318
Issue
5847
Pages
80-83
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2051584593
Cited by
1,630
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 99 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 115 · 2016: 117 · 2015: 123 · 2014: 112 · 2013: 127 · 2012: 94
FWCI
65.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Clay minerals and soil interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
Keywords
clay nanocomposites, bottom-up assembly, transparent nanocomposites, nanosheet orientation, stiffness, tensile strength, load transfer, hydrogen bonding, covalent bonding, nanoscale building blocks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review