Cited by 951Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

When fear is near: threat imminence elicits prefrontal periaqueductal gray shifts in humans.

Open access
Mobbs, Dean, Petrovic, Predrag, Marchant, Jennifer L., Hassabis, Demis, Weiskopf, Nikolaus, Seymour, Ben, Dolan, Raymond J., Frith, Christopher D.·2007·Science

Abstract

Humans, like other animals, alter their behavior depending on whether a threat is close or distant. We investigated spatial imminence of threat by developing an active avoidance paradigm in which volunteers were pursued through a maze by a virtual predator endowed with an ability to chase, capture, and inflict pain. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found that as the virtual predator grew closer, brain activity shifted from the ventromedial prefrontal cortex to the periaqueductal gray. This shift showed maximal expression when a high degree of pain was anticipated. Moreover, imminence-driven periaqueductal gray activity correlated with increased subjective degree of dread and decreased confidence of escape. Our findings cast light on the neural dynamics of threat anticipation and have implications for the neurobiology of human anxiety-related disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1144298

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The periaqueductal grey contributes to non-conscious emotion perception and reflexive behaviors aimed at helping to escape threatening situations.

    “A small region in the brainstem, the periaqueductal grey, contributes to non-conscious emotion perception and reflexive behaviors aimed at helping to escape threatening situations [145,150].”

    From Treatment of dissociative identity disorder: leveraging neurobiology to optimize success (2024) · cites this paper as [145]

    In the supplied passage labeled “When Fear Is Near > Abstract” (page unavailable), the paper identifies the PAG as a midbrain region implicated in reflexive escape behavior and reports increased PAG activity as threat became proximal. The copy does not establish a role for the PAG in non-conscious emotion perception. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Under typical circumstances, cortical structures like vmPFC and limbic regions like amygdala and periaqueductal grey have a balanced relationship and can influence the activity of the other flexibly based on need and context.

    “Under typical circumstances, cortical structures like the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and limbic regions like the amygdala and periaqueductal grey have a balanced relationship and can influence the activity of the other flexibly based on need and context [145,146].”

    From Treatment of dissociative identity disorder: leveraging neurobiology to optimize success (2024) · cites this paper as [145]

    The paper’s ‘When Fear Is Near’ section describes a balance between forebrain and midbrain responses to threat: vmPFC activity is greater with distal threat, PAG activity with proximal threat, and each may affect the other’s control of defensive responses. It also describes connections involving the amygdala. It does not establish that all three regions have a generally balanced, mutually influential relationship under typical circumstances outside threat responses. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A bias towards looming and approaching stimuli has been observed in structures directly involved in orchestrating the behavioral response to pain and threatening stimuli, such as the periaqueductal grey.

    “Supporting this hypothesis, a bias towards looming and approaching stimuli has been also observed in structures directly involved in orchestrating the behavioral response to pain and threatening stimuli, such as the periaqueductal grey (Mobbs et al. 2007; Coker-Appiah et al. 2013; Vieira et al. 2020).”

    From Neuroanatomical correlates of peripersonal space: bridging the gap between perception, action, emotion and social cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Mobbs et al. 2007

    In the indexed copy (When Fear Is Near > Abstract; page unavailable), PAG activity increased as a virtual predator approached, particularly when more pain was anticipated. This supports a response to an approaching threat, but the study did not test looming stimuli or approaching stimuli generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The periaqueductal gray is responsible for generating primitive affective sensations and plays a critical role in maintaining autonomic and physiological homeostasis.

    “In addition, the periaqueductal gray is another midbrain structure that is responsible for generating primitive affective sensations and plays a critical role in maintaining autonomic and physiological homeostasis (Bandler and Shipley, 1994; Behbehani, 1995; Mobbs et al., 2007).”

    From How Processing of Sensory Information From the Internal and External Worlds Shape the Perception and Engagement With the World in the Aftermath of Trauma: Implications for PTSD (2021) · cites this paper as Mobbs et al., 2007

    The indexed copy (When Fear Is Near > Abstract; page not provided) reports that PAG activity increased as threat approached and correlated with subjective dread, supporting a role in affective threat responses. It does not establish that the PAG generates primitive affective sensations or maintains autonomic and physiological homeostasis; its mention of autonomic functioning concerns connected regions, not that claimed PAG role. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mobbs et al. (2007) showed increases in periaqueductal gray activity while prefrontal cortex activity simultaneously decreases when threat is imminent, suggesting that extreme arousal responses can interrupt the transmission of fear-related stimuli to prefrontal regions.

    “Interestingly, Mobbs et al. (2007) showed increases in periaqueductal gray activity while prefrontal cortex activity simultaneously decreases when threat is imminent, suggesting that extreme arousal responses can interrupt the transmission of fear-related stimuli to prefrontal regions.”

    From How Processing of Sensory Information From the Internal and External Worlds Shape the Perception and Engagement With the World in the Aftermath of Trauma: Implications for PTSD (2021) · cites this paper as Mobbs et al., 2007

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 951

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Rau V Fanselow MS Kirmayer LJ Lemelson R Barad M Understanding Trauma: Integrating Biological, Clinical, and Cultural Perspectives 2007 27 40 Cambridge Univ. Press New York

Authors
Mobbs, D., Petrovic, P., Marchant, J. L., Hassabis, D., Weiskopf, N., Seymour, B., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Functional Imaging Laboratory, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Corresponding author
Mobbs, Dean
Venue
Science
Published
2007-08-24
Volume
317
Issue
5841
Pages
1079-1083
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2024988985
Cited by
951
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 52
FWCI
18.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (078865)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
threat anticipation, periaqueductal gray, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, avoidance behavior, pain anticipation, dread, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Avoidance Learning, Behavior, Brain Mapping, Escape Reaction, Fear, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Oxygen, Pain, Periaqueductal Gray, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review