Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comment on “emergence of novel color vision in mice engineered to express a human cone photopigment”

Makous, Walter·2007·Science

Abstract

Jacobs et al . (Reports, 23 March 2007, p. 1723) reported that plasticity in the mammalian visual system permitted the emergence of “a new dimension of sensory experience” in mice genetically engineered to express a human long-wavelength–sensitive cone photopigment. However, neither neural plasticity nor a new dimension of sensory experience is required to explain their results.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1146084

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1126/science.1138838 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1073/pnas.1934712100 · DOI · Paper page
  3. R. M. Steinman, J. Z. Levinson, in Eye Movements and Their Role in Visual and Cognitive Processes, E. Kowler, Ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990), pp. 115–212.
  4. R. W. Ditchburn, D. H. Fender, J. Mod. Opt.2, 128 (1955).
  5. 10.1126/science.185.4157.1171 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90020-8 · DOI
  7. H. von Helmholtz Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics: Translated from the Third German Edition (Dover New York ed. 3 1962).
  8. 10.1016/0042-6989(75)90259-X · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Makous, W.
Affiliations
Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Venue
Science
Published
2007-10-12
Volume
318
Issue
5848
Pages
196-196
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
10
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review