The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Structural Nanocomposites
Abstract
Materials scientists predict that composites made with nanoscale reinforcing materials such as nanotubes, platelets, and nanofibers will have exceptional mechanical properties. However, the results obtained so far are disappointing, particularly when compared to advanced composites reinforced with high-performance continuous fibers (1–4). The reasons include inadequate dispersion and alignment of the nanoreinforcement, low nanoreinforcement volume fraction, and poor bonding and load transfer at interfaces. Intensive work is under way, but the prospect of bulk structural supernanocomposites appears more remote now than it did just a few years ago. However, recent work shows that some applications in reinforcement of small structures may have a near-term payoff that can foster longer-term work on nanocomposites. Most of the work on structural nanocomposites has relied on ultrastrong nanoreinforcement such as single- walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) (1–3). However, the high SWCNT strength has not yet translated into bulk strength, and it is not even clear whether such translation is possible: Any attempt to create strong interfacial bonds will introduce defects into the SWCNTs that reduce their intrinsic strength. Still, multifunctional applications not relying solely on the mechanical superproperties will benefit (4, 5). Tailorability and controlled anisotropy are other useful special features of nanocomposites. Multiscale modeling (6) will help us achieve the desired balance between various functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interlaminar and intralaminar reinforcement of composite laminates with aligned carbon nanotubes
Wicks, S. S., de Villoria, R. G., & Wardle, B. L. (2010) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.09.001 · Cited by 431
Hamedi, M. M., Hajian, A., Fall, A. B., Håkansson, K., Salajkova, M., Lundell, F., Wågberg, L., & Berglund, L. A. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn4060368 · Cited by 381
Polymer matrix nanocomposites for automotive structural components
Naskar, A. K., Keum, J. K., & Boeman, R. G. (2016) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.262 · Cited by 316
Ultra‐Robust Graphene Oxide‐Silk Fibroin Nanocomposite Membranes
Hu, K., Gupta, M. K., Kulkarni, D. D., & Tsukruk, V. V. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201300179 · Cited by 307
Heparin-Eluting Electrospun Nanofiber Yarns for Antithrombotic Vascular Sutures
Bae, S., DiBalsi, M. J., Meilinger, N., Zhang, C., Beal, E., Korneva, G., Brown, R. O., Kornev, K. G., & Lee, J. S. (2018) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b14888 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Dzenis, Y.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2008-01-25
- Volume
- 319
- Issue
- 5862
- Pages
- 419-420
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2084757125
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural Nanocomposites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1151434
- The paper
- Dzenis, Y. (2008). Structural Nanocomposites. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151434
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.