Cited by 368Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchInsect Pheromone Research and ControlInsect Pest Control Strategies

Insect Odorant Receptors Are Molecular Targets of the Insect Repellent DEET

Abstract

DEET ( N,N -diethyl-meta-toluamide) is the world's most widely used topical insect repellent, with broad effectiveness against most insects. Its mechanism of action and molecular target remain unknown. Here, we show that DEET blocks electrophysiological responses of olfactory sensory neurons to attractive odors in Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster . DEET inhibits behavioral attraction to food odors in Drosophila , and this inhibition requires the highly conserved olfactory co-receptor OR83b. DEET inhibits odor-evoked currents mediated by the insect odorant receptor complex, comprising a ligand-binding subunit and OR83b. We conclude that DEET masks host odor by inhibiting subsets of heteromeric insect odorant receptors that require the OR83b co-receptor. The identification of candidate molecular targets for the action of DEET may aid in the design of safer and more effective insect repellents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1153121

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are several electrophysiological and behavioural assays with correspondingly robust analyses currently being used in vector biology research that could be incorporated into such schemes once adopted by WHOPES and the wider scientific community.

    “The promising news is that there are several electrophysiological and behavioural assays with correspondingly robust analyses currently being used in vector biology research that could be incorporated into such schemes once adopted by WHOPES and the wider scientific community [16,36-42].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 368

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. J. G. Breman, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.64, 1 (2001).
  2. 10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.131 · DOI
  3. S. J. Moore, A. Lenglet, in Traditional Medicinal Plants and Malaria, M. Wilcox, G. Bodeker, P. Rasoanaivo, Eds. (CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, London, 2004), pp. 343–363.
  4. 10.1093/jee/48.6.741 · DOI
  5. 10.1021/jo01369a003 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.0269-283X.2005.00559.x · DOI
  7. J. A. Klun, A. Khrimian, M. Debboun, J. Med. Entomol.43, 34 (2006).
  8. 10.1016/j.exppara.2006.12.011 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/jee/63.5.1576 · DOI
  10. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.1999.00145.x · DOI
  11. 10.1007/BF00612696 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/jmedent/18.5.357 · DOI
  13. W. Takken, D. L. Kline, J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc.5, 311 (1989).
  14. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.062 · DOI
  15. 10.1603/0022-0493-94.6.1584 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.019 · DOI
  17. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040020 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.93.12.6079 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s00424-007-0263-x · DOI
  20. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2432-05.2005 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.05.012 · DOI
  22. 10.1126/science.1106267 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/nn1371 · DOI
  24. 10.1110/ps.051745906 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.11.007 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/427212a · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00863-5 · DOI

Authors
Ditzen, M., Pellegrino, M., & Vosshall, L. B.
Affiliations
Rockefeller University (US)
Corresponding author
Vosshall, Leslie B.
Venue
Science
Published
2008-03-28
Volume
319
Issue
5871
Pages
1838-1842
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2021903377
Cited by
368
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 19
FWCI
11.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC008600, DC008600)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Pheromone Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
Keywords
DEET, insect repellents, olfactory receptors, Anopheles gambiae, Drosophila melanogaster, olfactory sensory neurons, heteromeric receptors, mechanism of action
MeSH terms
Animals, Anopheles, Behavior, Animal, DEET, Drosophila melanogaster, Electrophysiology, Feeding Behavior, Food, Insect Repellents, Ligands, Mutation, Odorants, Oocytes, Xenopus laevis, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Receptors, Odorant, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Drosophila Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review