Cited by 453Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionCephalopods and Marine BiologyAdvanced Materials and Mechanics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Transition from Stiff to Compliant Materials in Squid Beaks

Open access

Abstract

The beak of the Humboldt squid Dosidicus gigas represents one of the hardest and stiffest wholly organic materials known. As it is deeply embedded within the soft buccal envelope, the manner in which impact forces are transmitted between beak and envelope is a matter of considerable scientific interest. Here, we show that the hydrated beak exhibits a large stiffness gradient, spanning two orders of magnitude from the tip to the base. This gradient is correlated with a chemical gradient involving mixtures of chitin, water, and His-rich proteins that contain 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl- l -alanine (dopa) and undergo extensive stabilization by histidyl-dopa cross-link formation. These findings may serve as a foundation for identifying design principles for attaching mechanically mismatched materials in engineering and biological applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1154117

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extant cephalopod jaws are made of one of the hardest and stiffest known wholly organic materials, which probably applied to many extinct cephalopods as well.

    “Extant cephalopods jaws are made of one of the hardest and stiffest known wholly organic materials (Miserez et al. 2008), which probably applied to many extinct cephalopods as well.”

    From Palaeozoic evolution of animal mouthparts (2017) · cites this paper as Miserez et al. 2008

    The Abstract describes the Humboldt squid beak—and specifically its tip—as among the hardest and stiffest wholly organic biomaterials. It does not establish that characterization for jaws across extant cephalopods. The suggestion about extinct cephalopods follows the citation and appears to be the citing authors’ inference, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00540.x · DOI
  2. A. J. Kinloch, Adhesion and Adhesive: Science and Technology (Chapman & Hall, London, 1987), pp. 206–209.
  3. 10.1126/science.1059716 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nmat1323 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.027 · DOI
  6. 10.1021/bi049380h · DOI
  7. 10.1098/rsif.2006.0210 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/jmor.10330 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.actbio.2006.09.004 · DOI
  10. R. D. Barnes Invertebrate Zoology (Saunders Philadelphia 1966).
  11. 10.1074/jbc.M603429200 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19990601)37:11<1191::AID-POLB13>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
  13. 10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.001421 · DOI
  14. V. A. Iconomidou, J. H. Willis, S. J. Hamodrakas, Insect Biochem.35, 533 (2005).
  15. 10.1006/abio.1998.3069 · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.3823880 · DOI
  17. A. C. Neville Biology of Fibrous Composites: Development Beyond the Cell Membrane (Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge 1993). · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00167-7 · DOI
  19. 10.1146/annurev.en.24.010179.000333 · DOI
  20. 10.1074/jbc.M508674200 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0022-1910(87)90010-2 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/bm005652u · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18574.x · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0020-1790(80)90082-7 · DOI
  25. 10.1021/ac0106501 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/ja065794h · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Miserez, A., Schneberk, T., Sun, C., Zok, F. W., & Waite, J. H.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zok, Frank W.
  • Waite, J. Herbert
Venue
Science
Published
2008-03-28
Volume
319
Issue
5871
Pages
1816-1819
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2028356706
Cited by
453
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE014672, R01DE015415)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Cephalopods and Marine Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
Keywords
Dosidicus gigas, stiffness gradient, organic materials, chitin, histidine-rich proteins, DOPA, impact force transmission, mechanical mismatch, biomaterial design
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Animals, Beak, Biomechanical Phenomena, Chitin, Compliance, Dihydroxyphenylalanine, Dopamine, Freeze Drying, Glucosamine, Hardness, Histidine, Pigmentation, Proteins, Water, Decapodiformes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review