Cited by 2,043Adhesion, Friction, and Surface InteractionsPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesMarine Biology and Environmental Chemistry

A reversible wet/dry adhesive inspired by mussels and geckos

Lee, Haeshin, Lee, Bruce P., Messersmith, Phillip B.·2007·Nature

Abstract

The adhesive strategy of the gecko relies on foot pads composed of specialized keratinous foot-hairs called setae, which are subdivided into terminal spatulae of approximately 200 nm (ref. 1). Contact between the gecko foot and an opposing surface generates adhesive forces that are sufficient to allow the gecko to cling onto vertical and even inverted surfaces. Although strong, the adhesion is temporary, permitting rapid detachment and reattachment of the gecko foot during locomotion. Researchers have attempted to capture these properties of gecko adhesive in synthetic mimics with nanoscale surface features reminiscent of setae; however, maintenance of adhesive performance over many cycles has been elusive, and gecko adhesion is greatly diminished upon full immersion in water. Here we report a hybrid biologically inspired adhesive consisting of an array of nanofabricated polymer pillars coated with a thin layer of a synthetic polymer that mimics the wet adhesive proteins found in mussel holdfasts. Wet adhesion of the nanostructured polymer pillar arrays increased nearly 15-fold when coated with mussel-mimetic polymer. The system maintains its adhesive performance for over a thousand contact cycles in both dry and wet environments. This hybrid adhesive, which combines the salient design elements of both gecko and mussel adhesives, should be useful for reversible attachment to a variety of surfaces in any environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature05968

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) exists in mussel adhesive proteins.

    “These works reveal that a noncanonical amino acid, namely, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) exists in the mussel adhesive proteins [6,7].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, H., Lee, B. P., & Messersmith, P. B.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Messersmith, Phillip B.
Venue
Nature
Published
2007-07
Volume
448
Issue
7151
Pages
338-341
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2103511109
Cited by
2,043
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 118 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 153 · 2020: 142 · 2019: 150 · 2018: 148 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 121 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 144 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 96
FWCI
92.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Northwestern University
  • University of Chicago
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
Keywords
wet adhesion, dry adhesion, reversible adhesion, gecko setae, mussel adhesive proteins, biomimetic adhesives, nanofabrication, biomimetic materials
MeSH terms
Adhesiveness, Adhesives, Animals, Polymers, Vertebrates, Water, Biomimetics, Biomimetic Materials, Nanostructures, Bivalvia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review