Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 574

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Agriculture at a Crossroads

Open access
Kiers, E. Toby, Leakey, Roger R. B., Izac, Anne-Marie, Heinemann, Jack A., Rosenthal, Erika, Nathan, Dev, Jiggins, Janice·2008·Science

Abstract

Recent scientific assessments(1–4) have alerted the world to the increasing size of agriculture's footprint, including its contribution to climate change and degradation of natural resources (5). By some analyses,agriculture is the single largest threat to biodiversity(6). Agriculture requires more land, water, and human labor than any other industry(7). An estimated 75% of the world's poor and hungry live in rural areas and depend directly or indirectly on agriculture for their livelihoods(8). As grain commodity prices rise and per capita grain production stagnates (9), policy-makers are torn between allocating land to food or fuel needs. The governance of agriculture requires new thinking if it is to meet the needs of humanity now and in the future. The International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) brought together governments, international organizations, and private sector and civil society organizations to address these challenges (10). The task was to assess the current state and future potential of formal and informal knowledge, as well as science and technology (S&T), (i) to reduce hunger and poverty, (ii) to improve rural livelihoods, and (iii) to facilitate equitable, sustainable development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1158390

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2007). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Global Assessment Reports (Island Press, Washington, DC, 2005).
  3. Molden D., Ed. Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture (Earthscan, London, 2007).
  4. U.N. Environment Programme (UNEP), Global Environment Outlook (GEO-4) (UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, 2007).
  5. FAO, Food Outlook 2007: Global Market Analysis (FAO, Rome, 2007).
  6. 10.1126/science.1106049 · DOI · Paper page
  7. FAO, The State of Food and Agriculture 2007: Paying Farmers for Environmental Services (FAO, Rome, 2007).
  8. International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development (Island Press Washington DC 2008).
  9. 10.1126/science.1057544 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Editor, Nat. Biotechnol.26, 247 (2008). · doi:10.1038/nbt0308-247
  11. 10.1126/science.319.5869.1474 · doi:10.1126/science.319.5869.1474
  12. Editor, Nature451, 223 (2008).
  13. Evans L. T., J. Agric. Sci.143, 7 (2005). · doi:10.1017/s0021859604004460
  14. 10.1126/science.1078710 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1126/science.1152339 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Delmer D. P., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.102, 15739 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Pray C. E., Naseem A., J. Dev. Stud.43, 192 (2007). · doi:10.1080/00220380601055676
  18. 10.1126/science.1065256 · DOI · Paper page
  19. FAO, Milk and Dairy Products: Post-Harvest Losses and Food Safety in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Near East (FAO, Rome, 2004).
  20. Sustainable Rice Production for Food Security Proceedings of the 20th Session of the International Rice Commission Bangkok Thailand 23 to 26 July 2002 (FAO Rome 2003).
  21. Van Mele P., Agric. Forest Entomol.10, 13 (2008). · DOI
  22. Leakey R. R. B., et al., Int. J. Agric. Sustain.3, 1 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Dingkuhn M., et al., Agric. Water Manage.80, 241 (2006). · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.016
  24. Lilja N., Dixon J., Exp. Agric.44, 3 (2008). · DOI
  25. Alston J., et al., A Meta-Analysis of Rates of Return to Agricultural R&D: Research Report 113 (IFPRI, Washington, DC, 2002).
  26. Sustainable Development Department of the FAO, Sustainable Rural Development: Progress and Challenges. Education, Training and Extension (FAO, Rome, 2007).
  27. Nederlof E. S., Röling N., van Huis A., Int. J. Agric. Sustain.5, 247 (2007). · doi:10.1080/14735903.2007.9684825
  28. Jane T. S., Rukuni T. S., Zimbabwe's Agricultural Revolution: Managing the Food Economy in the 1990s, , Rukuni M., Eicher C. K., Eds. (Univ. of Zimbabwe Publications, Harare, 1994).
  29. Morrison J., Sarris A., WTO Rules for Agriculture Compatible with Development, , Morrison J., Sarris A., Eds. (FAO, Rome, 2007).

Cited by

See all 574

Metadata

Authors
Kiers, E. T., Leakey, R. R. B., Izac, A.-M., Heinemann, J. A., Rosenthal, E., Nathan, D., & Jiggins, J.
Venue
Science
Published
2008-04-18
Volume
320
Issue
5874
Pages
320-321
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2171820440
Cited by
574
References
0
FWCI
171.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agriculture at a Crossroads. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1158390
The paper
Kiers, E. T., Leakey, R. R. B., Izac, A.-M., Heinemann, J. A., Rosenthal, E., Nathan, D., & Jiggins, J. (2008). Agriculture at a Crossroads. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158390

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.