Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 745

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Common Regulatory Variation Impacts Gene Expression in a Cell Type–Dependent Manner

Open access
Dimas, Antigone S., Deutsch, Samuel, Stranger, Barbara E., Montgomery, Stephen B., Borel, Christelle, Attar-Cohen, Homa, Ingle, Catherine, Beazley, Claude, Arcelus, Maria Gutierrez, Sekowska, Magdalena, Gagnebin, Marilyne, Nisbett, James, Deloukas, Panos, Dermitzakis, Emmanouil T., Antonarakis, Stylianos E.·2009·Science

Abstract

Tissue-Specific Control: The effect of genetic variation on gene expression and phenotype among individuals is largely unknown. Dimas et al. (p. 1246 , published online 30 July 2009) show that in humans there are several genes whose allelic expression varies in a tissue-specific manner and are apparently controlled by cis elements. Up to 80% of variants seem to have tissue-specific functions when compared in fibroblasts, as well as B cells and T cells. This variation among regulatory variants correlated with transcript complexity, which suggests that some of the observed regulatory variation is due to genotype-specific use of transcripts and transcription start sites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1174148

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 745

Metadata

Authors
Dimas, A. S., Deutsch, S., Stranger, B. E., Montgomery, S. B., Borel, C., Attar-Cohen, H., Ingle, C., Beazley, C., Arcelus, M. G., Sekowska, M., Gagnebin, M., Nisbett, J., Deloukas, P., Dermitzakis, E. T., & Antonarakis, S. E.
Venue
Science
Published
2009-09-04
Volume
325
Issue
5945
Pages
1246-1250
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2069298307
Cited by
745
References
10
FWCI
38.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.