Cited by 2,722Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenomics and Rare DiseasesGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Annotation of functional variation in personal genomes using RegulomeDB

Open access
Boyle, Alan P., Hong, Eurie L., Hariharan, Manoj, Cheng, Yong, Schaub, Marc A., Kasowski, Maya, Karczewski, Konrad J., Park, Julie +4 more·2012·Genome Research

Abstract

As the sequencing of healthy and disease genomes becomes more commonplace, detailed annotation provides interpretation for individual variation responsible for normal and disease phenotypes. Current approaches focus on direct changes in protein coding genes, particularly nonsynonymous mutations that directly affect the gene product. However, most individual variation occurs outside of genes and, indeed, most markers generated from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identify variants outside of coding segments. Identification of potential regulatory changes that perturb these sites will lead to a better localization of truly functional variants and interpretation of their effects. We have developed a novel approach and database, RegulomeDB, which guides interpretation of regulatory variants in the human genome. RegulomeDB includes high-throughput, experimental data sets from ENCODE and other sources, as well as computational predictions and manual annotations to identify putative regulatory potential and identify functional variants. These data sources are combined into a powerful tool that scores variants to help separate functional variants from a large pool and provides a small set of putative sites with testable hypotheses as to their function. We demonstrate the applicability of this tool to the annotation of noncoding variants from 69 full sequenced genomes as well as that of a personal genome, where thousands of functionally associated variants were identified. Moreover, we demonstrate a GWAS where the database is able to quickly identify the known associated functional variant and provide a hypothesis as to its function. Overall, we expect this approach and resource to be valuable for the annotation of human genome sequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.137323.112

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Harrow J, Frankish A, Gonzalez JM, Tapanari E, Diekhans M, Kokocinski F, Aken BL, Barrell D, Zadissa A, Searle S, 2012 GENCODE: The reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project. Genome Res (this issue). doi: 10.1101/gr.135350.111 PMC3431492 22955987 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Veyrieras J-B, Kudaravalli S, Kim SY, Dermitzakis ET, Gilad Y, Stephens M, Pritchard JK 2008 High-resolution mapping of expression-QTLs yields insight into human gene regulation. PLoS Genet 4: e1000214 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.10002 18846210 PMC2556086 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boyle, A. P., Hong, E. L., Hariharan, M., Cheng, Y., Schaub, M. A., Kasowski, M., Karczewski, K. J., Park, J., Hitz, B. C., Weng, S., Cherry, J. M., & Snyder, M.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Snyder, Michael
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2012-09
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
1790-1797
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141820415
Cited by
2,722
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 123 · 2025: 169 · 2024: 173 · 2023: 195 · 2022: 213 · 2021: 245 · 2020: 225 · 2019: 213 · 2018: 226 · 2017: 218 · 2016: 232 · 2015: 204 · 2014: 173 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 11
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U54HG004558)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007205)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
RegulomeDB, regulatory variants, non-coding variants, genome-wide association study, ENCODE, human genome
MeSH terms
Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha-Induced Protein 3, DNA-Binding Proteins, Genotype, Humans, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Nuclear Proteins, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Open Reading Frames, Internet, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Databases, Genetic, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Genome-Wide Association Study, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review