Cited by 172Astro and Planetary ScienceStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

Capture of the Sun's Oort Cloud from Stars in Its Birth Cluster

Levison, Harold F., Duncan, Martin J., Brasser, Ramon, Kaufmann, David E.·2010·Science

Abstract

Out of the Oort Cloud: Long-period comets originate from the Oort cloud, a vast reservoir of icy bodies that surrounds the solar system. These bodies are thought to be remnants from the formation of the solar system. But did they all form in the Sun's protoplanetary disk, or could they have been generated in the protoplanetary disks of other stars in the cluster where the Sun probably formed? Levison et al. (p. 187 , published online 10 June) used detailed numerical simulations to investigate what fraction of comets might transfer from the outer reaches of one stellar system to another. The simulations suggest that a substantial number of comets can be captured through this mechanism, which may explain why the number of bodies in the Oort cloud is larger than models predict.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1187535

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trans-Neptunian objects may provide a significant fraction of the Solar System's liquid water reservoir, perhaps collectively as much as on Earth.

    “Given the overwhelming population of the Kuiper Belt (106 objects greater than a few tens of kilometers; Morbidelli and Levison, 2007) and Oort Cloud (∼4 × 1011 objects with a radius larger than 1 km; Levison et al., 2010), trans-neptunian objects may provide a significant fraction of the Solar System's liquid water reservoir, perhaps collectively even as much as on Earth (Desch et al., 2009).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Levison et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levison, H. F., Duncan, M. J., Brasser, R., & Kaufmann, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Southwest Research Institute (US)
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Levison, Harold F.
Venue
Science
Published
2010-07-09
Volume
329
Issue
5988
Pages
187-190
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2074176657
Cited by
172
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 16
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
Oort cloud, long-period comets, protoplanetary disks, solar system formation, stellar encounters, numerical simulation, icy bodies
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Solar System, Planets, Meteoroids, Evolution, Planetary, Stars, Celestial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review