Cited by 217Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Hybrid Incompatibility “Snowballs” Between Solanum Species

Moyle, Leonie C., Nakazato, Takuya·2010·Science

Abstract

Among the reproductive barriers that can isolate species, hybrid sterility is frequently due to dysfunctional interactions between loci that accumulate between differentiating lineages. Theory describing the evolution of these incompatibilities has generated the prediction, still empirically untested, that loci underlying hybrid incompatibility should accumulate faster than linearly with time--the "snowball effect." We evaluated the accumulation of quantitative trait loci (QTL) between species in the plant group Solanum and found evidence for a faster-than-linear accumulation of hybrid seed sterility QTL, thus empirically evaluating and confirming this theoretical prediction. In comparison, loci underlying traits unrelated to hybrid sterility show no evidence for an accelerating rate of accumulation between species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1193063

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The faster-than-linear accumulation of hybrid incompatibilities with divergence time has been recovered in multiple taxa including Solanum, Drosophila, and Mus musculus.

    “this result has been recovered in multiple taxa: Including Solanum (Moyle and Nakazato 2010; Guerrero et al. 2017), Drosophila (Matute et al. 2010), or Mus musculus (Wang et al. 2015).”

    From Finding Hybrid Incompatibilities Using Genome Sequences from Hybrid Populations (2021) · cites this paper as Moyle and Nakazato 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moyle, L. C., & Nakazato, T.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Venue
Science
Published
2010-09-17
Volume
329
Issue
5998
Pages
1521-1523
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2062653909
Cited by
217
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
16.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
hybrid incompatibility, snowball effect, postzygotic isolation, speciation, epistasis, seed sterility, pollen sterility, quantitative trait loci, deletion mapping, Solanum, Drosophila, hybrid sterility
MeSH terms
Chromosome Mapping, Epistasis, Genetic, Biological Evolution, Hybridization, Genetic, Models, Genetic, Pollen, Reproduction, Seeds, Species Specificity, Linear Models, Genes, Plant, Solanum lycopersicum, Solanum, Quantitative Trait Loci, Genetic Speciation, Plant Infertility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review